A new model of the learning process for innovation teams: Networked nominal pairs

International Journal of Innovation Management

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 521-535

  Dew, Robert ^a   Hearn, Greg ^b  

^a Coriolis Pty Ltd ^*  (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Brainstorming; Creativity; Creativity management; Group structures; Innovation; Innovation management; Nominal groups

Indexed keywords

EID: 76449120783     PISSN: 13639196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S136391960900239X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Altshuller, G (1996). And suddenly the inventor appeared: TRIZ. In The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Technical Innovation Centre. Worcester MA.
2. Amabile, TM (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 357-376.
3. Amabile, TM (1997). Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31 (1), 18-26.
4. Aniruddha, T (2004). A literature survey on a managerial perspective on the process of innovation management. MS dissertation, University of Southern California, United States-California.
5. Bresman, H (2007). Learning Strategies and the Performance of Innovation Teams. Proceedings of the academy of management.
6. Brown, V, M Tumeo, TS Larey and PB Paulus (1998). Modeling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29, 495-526.
7. Chesbrough, H (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
8. Chung, KH and MJ Ferris (1971). An inquiry of the nominal group process. Academy of Management Journal, 14.
9. Diehl, M and W Stroebe (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
10. Diehl, M and W Stroebe (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.
11. Green, TB (1975). An empirical analysis of nominal and interacting groups. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 63-73.
12. Hannele and Lampele (2008). Challenges and practices for learning within innovation networks. In XIX ISPIM Annual Conference Tours. France.
13. Henneke, D and C Luthje (2007). Interdisciplinary heterogeneity as a catalyst for product innovativeness of entrepreneurial teams. Interdisciplinary Heterogeneity and Product Innovativeness, 16 (2), 121-132.
14. Huff, A, JO Huff and PS Barr (2000). When Firms Change Direction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Isaksen, SGand KJ Lauer (2002). The climate for creativity and change in teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11, 74-86.
16. Karau, SJ and KDWilliams (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
17. Katzenbach, JR and DK Smith (1993). The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
18. Kerr, NL and SE Bruun (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78-94.
19. Kratzer, J, RTAJ Leenders and JML vanEngelen (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20, 69-92.
20. Kratzer, J, RTAJ Leenders and JML van Engelen (2004). Stimulating the potential: Creative performance and communication in innovation teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13 (1), 63-71.
21. Kratzer, J, RTAJ Leenders and JML van Engelen (2006). Team polarity and creative performance in innovation teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15 (1), 96-104.
22. Lamm, HandGTrommsdorff (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming). European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361-387.
23. Leifer, R, CM McDermott, GC O,Connor, LS Peters, MP Rice and RW Verzer (2000). Radical Innovation: HowMatureCompaniesCanOutsmartUpstarts. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
24. McGrath, JE (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
25. Paulus, PB, TS Larey and MT Dzindolet (2000). Creativity in groups and teams. In Groups At Work: Advances in Theory and Research, M Turner, (ed. ), pp. 319-338. Hillsdale, NJ: Hampton.
26. Parnes, SJ andAMeadow (1959). Effect of "brainstorming" instructions on creative problem solving by trained and untrained subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 171-176.
27. Paulus, PB (2000). Groups, teams and creativity: The creative potential of idea generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 237-262.
28. Paulus, PB and M Dzindolet (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575-586.
29. Taggar, S (2001). Group composition, creative synergy, and group performance. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35 (4), 261-286.
30. Van deVen, A and AL Delbecq (1974). The effectiveness of nominal, delphi, and interacting group decision making process. Academy of Management Journal, 117, 605-621.