Induced resistance: Destined to remain on the sidelines of crop protection?

Phytoparasitica

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-4

  Walters, Dale R ^a  

^a SCOTTISH AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 76449117903     PISSN: 03342123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12600-009-0067-y     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. Ayres, P. G. (1984). The interaction between environmental stress injury and abiotic disease physiology. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 22, 53-75.
2. Beckers, G. J., & Conrath, U. (2007). Priming for stress resistance: from the lab to the field. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 10, 425-431.
3. Dann, E., Diers, B., Byrum, J., & Hammerschmidt, R. (1998). Effect of treating soybean with 2, 6-dichloroisonicotinic acid (INA) and benzothiadiazole (BTH) on seed yields and the level of disease caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in field and greenhouse studies. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 104, 271-278.
4. Dietrich, R., Ploss, K., & Heil, M. (2005). Growth responses and fitness costs after induction of pathogen resistance depend on environmental conditions. Plant Cell and Environment, 28, 211-222.
5. Hammerschmidt, R. (1999). Induced disease resistance: how do induced plants stop pathogens? Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 55, 77-84.
6. Hammerschmidt, R. (2007). Introduction: definitions and some history. In D. Walters, A. Newton & G. Lyon (Eds.), Induced resistance for plant disease control: A sustainable approach to crop protection (pp. 65-88). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
7. Hijwegen, T., & Verhaar, M. A. (1994). Effects of cucumber genotype on the induction of resistance to powdery mildew. Plant Pathology, 44, 756-762.
8. Kuć, J. (1987). Plant immunization and its applicability for disease control. In I. Chet (Ed.), Innovative approaches to plant disease control (pp. 255-272). New York, NY: Wiley.
9. Pieterse, C. M. J., & van Loon, L. C. (2007). Signalling cascades involved in induced resistance. In D. Walters, A. Newton & G. Lyon (Eds.), Induced resistance for plant disease control: A sustainable approach to crop protection (pp. 65-88). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
10. Vallad, G. E., & Goodman, R. M. (2004). Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop Science, 44, 1920-1934.
11. van Hulten, M., Pelser, M., van Loon, L. C., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Ton, J. (2006). Costs and benefits of priming for defense in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 5602-5607.
12. Walters, D. R. (2009). Are plants in the field already induced? Implications for practical disease control. Crop Protection, 28, 459-465.
13. Walters, D. R., & Heil, M. (2007). Costs and trade-offs associated with induced resistance. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 71, 3-17.
14. Walters, D. R., Walsh, D., Newton, A. C., & Lyon, G. D. (2005). Induced resistance for plant disease control: maximising the efficacy of resistance elicitors. Phytopathology, 95, 1368-1373.
15. Walters, D. R., Paterson, L., Walsh, D. J., & Havis, N. D. (2009). Priming for plant defense in barley provides benefits only under high disease pressure. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 73, 95-100.
16. Wiese, J., Bagy, M. M. K., & Schubert, S. (2003). Soil properties, but not plant nutrients (N, P, K) interact with chemically induced resistance against powdery mildew in barley. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 166, 379-384.