Incorporating time and income constraints in dynamic agent-based models of activity generation and time use: Approach and illustration

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 71-83

  Arentze, Theo A ^a   Ettema, D ^b   Timmermans, Harry J P ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Activity generation; Agent based modeling; Income constraints; Time use; Travel demand modeling

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; BUDGET CONTROL; ECONOMICS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SIMULATION PLATFORM;

AGENT-BASED MODEL; DYNAMIC REPRESENTATION; INCOME CONSTRAINTS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION DECISION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION OPTIMIZATION; TIME USE; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

INCOME; OPTIMIZATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SIMULATION; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 76449111979     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2009.04.016     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Arentze T.A., and Timmermans H.J.P. A need-based model of multi-day, multi-person activity generation. Transportation Research Part B 43 (2009) 251-265
2. Arentze, T.A., Ettema, D.F., Timmermans, H.J.P., 2007. Micro-simulation of individual space-time behavior in urban environments: a new model and first experiences. Paper Presented at the 10th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Foz de Iguacu, Brazil.
3. Ashiru, O., Polak, J.W., Noland, R.B., 2004. The utility of schedules: a theoretical model of departure time choice and activity time allocation with application to individual activity schedules. In: Proceedings of the 82th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (CD-ROM).
4. Becker G.A. Theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal 75 (1965) 493-517
5. DeSerpa A. A theory of the economics of time. The Economic Journal 81 (1971) 828-846
6. Ettema D.F., and Timmermans H.J.P. Multi-agent modelling of urban systems: the PUMA system. Proceedings of the 7th AMUS Conference (2006), ISS, Aachen 165-172
7. Ettema D., De Jong K., Timmermans H., and Bakema A. PUMA: multi-agent modelling of urban systems. In: Koomen E., Bakema A., Stillwell J., and Scholten H. (Eds). Land Use Modeling (2007), Springer 237-258
8. Gärling T., Kwan M.-P., and Golledge R.G. Computational-process modeling of household travel activity scheduling. Transportation Research Part B 25 (1994) 355-364
9. Kitamura R. A model for daily time allocation to discretionary out-of-home activities and trips. Transportation Research B 18 (1984) 255-266
10. Habib, K.M.N., Miller, E.J., 2007. Modeling daily activity program generation considering within-day and day-to-day dynamics in activity-travel behaviour. In: Proceedings of the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (CD-ROM).
11. Hunt, D.J., Abraham, J., 2003. Design and application of the PECAS land-use modeling. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Sendai, Japan.
12. Jara-Diaz S.R., and Martinez F.J. On the specification of indirect utility and willingness to pay for discrete residential location models. Journal of Regional Science 39 (1999) 675-688
13. Kato, H., Matsumoto, M., 2007. Intra-household interaction analysis among a husband, a wife and a child using the joint time-allocation model. In: Proceedings of the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (CD-ROM).
14. Kockelman K.M. A model for time- and budget-constrained activity demand analysis. Transportation Research Part B 35 (2001) 255-269
15. Moeckel, R., Schurmann, C., Wegener, M., 2002. Microsimulation of urban land use. Paper presented at the 42nd European Congress of the Regional Science Association, Dordmund, August 27-31, 2002.
16. Waddell P. UrbanSim, modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 68 (2002) 297-314