-
1
-
-
33646390484
-
Drug firms boost pitch directly to consumers
-
Miller C. Drug firms boost pitch directly to consumers. Marketing News. 28:1994;1
-
(1994)
Marketing News
, vol.28
, pp. 1
-
-
Miller, C.1
-
2
-
-
0031902621
-
Rote learning after exposure to a direct-to-consumer television advertisement for a prescription drug
-
Schommer J.C., Doucette W.R., Mehta B.H. Rote learning after exposure to a direct-to-consumer television advertisement for a prescription drug. Clin. Ther. 20:1998;617-632
-
(1998)
Clin. Ther.
, vol.20
, pp. 617-632
-
-
Schommer, J.C.1
Doucette, W.R.2
Mehta, B.H.3
-
3
-
-
0037508216
-
-
Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation;
-
Frank RG, Berndt ER, Donohue JM, Epstein AM, Rosenthal MB. Trends in direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2002.
-
(2002)
Trends in Direct-to-consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs
-
-
Frank, R.G.1
Berndt, E.R.2
Donohue, J.M.3
Epstein, A.M.4
Rosenthal, M.B.5
-
4
-
-
0037075271
-
Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers
-
Rosenthal M.B., Berndt E.R., Donohue J.M., Frank R.G., Epstein A.M. Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:2002;498-505
-
(2002)
N. Engl. J. Med.
, vol.346
, pp. 498-505
-
-
Rosenthal, M.B.1
Berndt, E.R.2
Donohue, J.M.3
Frank, R.G.4
Epstein, A.M.5
-
5
-
-
0031614168
-
Direct to you: TV drug ads that make sense
-
Nordenberg T. Direct to you: TV drug ads that make sense. FDA Consumer. 32:1998;7-10
-
(1998)
FDA Consumer
, vol.32
, pp. 7-10
-
-
Nordenberg, T.1
-
6
-
-
0032419607
-
Regulation of prescription drug promotion: Direct-to-consumer advertising
-
Baylor-Henry M., Drezin N.A. Regulation of prescription drug promotion: direct-to-consumer advertising. Clin. Ther. 20:1998;C86-C95
-
(1998)
Clin. Ther.
, vol.20
-
-
Baylor-Henry, M.1
Drezin, N.A.2
-
7
-
-
0031255460
-
Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising
-
Talley C.R. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 54:1997;2181
-
(1997)
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm.
, vol.54
, pp. 2181
-
-
Talley, C.R.1
-
8
-
-
0030638535
-
Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising
-
Bradley L.R., Zito J.M. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising. Med. Care. 35:1997;86-92
-
(1997)
Med. Care
, vol.35
, pp. 86-92
-
-
Bradley, L.R.1
Zito, J.M.2
-
11
-
-
0025038813
-
The federal regulation of prescription drug advertising and promotion
-
Kessler D.A., Pines W.L. The federal regulation of prescription drug advertising and promotion. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 264:1990;2409-2415
-
(1990)
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
, vol.264
, pp. 2409-2415
-
-
Kessler, D.A.1
Pines, W.L.2
-
12
-
-
0005231055
-
Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising: Trends, impact, and implications
-
Wilkes M.S., Bell R.A., Kravitz R.L. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising: trends, impact, and implications. Health Aff. 19:2000;110-128
-
(2000)
Health Aff.
, vol.19
, pp. 110-128
-
-
Wilkes, M.S.1
Bell, R.A.2
Kravitz, R.L.3
-
13
-
-
0030531996
-
Patterns in direct-to-consumer prescription drug print advertising and their public policy implications
-
Roth M.S. Patterns in direct-to-consumer prescription drug print advertising and their public policy implications. J. Public Policy Marketing. 15:1996;63-75
-
(1996)
J. Public Policy Marketing
, vol.15
, pp. 63-75
-
-
Roth, M.S.1
-
14
-
-
0034538080
-
The educational value of consumer-targeted prescription drug print advertising
-
Bell R.A., Wilkes M.S., Kravitz R.L. The educational value of consumer-targeted prescription drug print advertising. J. Fam. Pract. 49:2000;1092-1098
-
(2000)
J. Fam. Pract.
, vol.49
, pp. 1092-1098
-
-
Bell, R.A.1
Wilkes, M.S.2
Kravitz, R.L.3
-
15
-
-
0030153889
-
Consumer reports. Drug advertising: Is this good medicine?
-
Consumer reports. Drug advertising: is this good medicine? Consumer Rep 1996;61:62-3.
-
(1996)
Consumer Rep
, vol.61
, pp. 62-63
-
-
-
16
-
-
0003743461
-
-
Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education;
-
Kirsch IS, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A. Adult literacy in America: a first look at the results of the national adult literacy survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education; 1993.
-
(1993)
Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Results of the National Adult Literacy Survey
-
-
Kirsch, I.S.1
Jungeblut, A.2
Jenkins, L.3
Kolstad, A.4
-
18
-
-
85071324144
-
Readability
-
Pearson PD, Barr R, Kamil ML, Mosenthal P, editors. New York: Longman;
-
Klare GR. Readability. In: Pearson PD, Barr R, Kamil ML, Mosenthal P, editors. Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman; 1984. p. 681-744.
-
(1984)
Handbook of Reading Research
, pp. 681-744
-
-
Klare, G.R.1
-
19
-
-
0025855319
-
Readability formulas: Cautions and criteria
-
Meade C.D., Smith C.F. Readability formulas: cautions and criteria. Pat. Educ. Couns. 17:1991;153-158
-
(1991)
Pat. Educ. Couns.
, vol.17
, pp. 153-158
-
-
Meade, C.D.1
Smith, C.F.2
-
20
-
-
0037755037
-
Readability formulas may mislead you
-
Pichert J.W., Elam P. Readability formulas may mislead you. Pat. Educ. Couns. 7:1985;181-191
-
(1985)
Pat. Educ. Couns.
, vol.7
, pp. 181-191
-
-
Pichert, J.W.1
Elam, P.2
-
22
-
-
0032996829
-
Easy-to-read consumer communications: A missing link in Medicaid managed care
-
Root J., Stableford S. Easy-to-read consumer communications: a missing link in Medicaid managed care. J. Health Polit. Policy Law. 24:1999;1-26
-
(1999)
J. Health Polit. Policy Law
, vol.24
, pp. 1-26
-
-
Root, J.1
Stableford, S.2
-
23
-
-
84909709134
-
Fry's readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extensions to level 17
-
Fry E. Fry's readability graph: clarifications, validity, and extensions to level 17. J. Reading. 21:1977;242-252
-
(1977)
J. Reading
, vol.21
, pp. 242-252
-
-
Fry, E.1
-
24
-
-
0036595805
-
Which prescription for the illegible and unreadable DTC brief summary - Major surgery or euthanasia?
-
Hochhauser M. Which prescription for the illegible and unreadable DTC brief summary - major surgery or euthanasia? Managed Care Q. 10:2002;6-10
-
(2002)
Managed Care Q.
, vol.10
, pp. 6-10
-
-
Hochhauser, M.1
-
25
-
-
0028487906
-
Patient Package Insert readability and design
-
Basara L.R., Juergens J.P. Patient Package Insert readability and design. Am. Pharm. NS34:1994;48-53
-
(1994)
Am. Pharm.
, vol.34
, pp. 48-53
-
-
Basara, L.R.1
Juergens, J.P.2
-
26
-
-
0019089052
-
Application of the readability concept to patient-oriented drug information
-
Morris L.A., Myers A., Thilman D.G. Application of the readability concept to patient-oriented drug information. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 37:1980;1504-1509
-
(1980)
Am. J. Hosp. Pharm.
, vol.37
, pp. 1504-1509
-
-
Morris, L.A.1
Myers, A.2
Thilman, D.G.3
-
27
-
-
0001736594
-
SMOG grading - A new readability formula
-
McLaughlin G. SMOG grading - a new readability formula. J. Reading. 12:1969;639-646
-
(1969)
J. Reading
, vol.12
, pp. 639-646
-
-
McLaughlin, G.1
-
28
-
-
0036091299
-
Using alternative methodologies for evaluating patient medication leaflets
-
Krass I., Svarstad B.L., Bultman D. Using alternative methodologies for evaluating patient medication leaflets. Pat. Educ. Couns. 47:2002;29-35
-
(2002)
Pat. Educ. Couns.
, vol.47
, pp. 29-35
-
-
Krass, I.1
Svarstad, B.L.2
Bultman, D.3
-
29
-
-
0003450236
-
-
Washington, DC: National Institute for Health Care Management Foundation;
-
National Institute for Health Care Management Research and Educational Foundation. Prescription drug expenditures in 2001: another year of escalating costs. Washington, DC: National Institute for Health Care Management Foundation; 2002.
-
(2002)
Prescription Drug Expenditures in 2001: Another Year of Escalating Costs
-
-
-
30
-
-
7644221687
-
-
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Public Law 87-781, 21CFR202.1, Section 502(n).
-
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Public Law 87-781, 21CFR202.1, Section 502(n).
-
-
-
|