Increasing screening uptake amongst those intending to be screened: The use of action plans

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 218-222

  Michie, Susan ^a,b   Dormandy, Elizabeth ^b   Marteau, Theresa M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action plans; Antenatal care; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL PERIOD; PRENATAL SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCREENING TEST; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DOWN SYNDROME; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTENTION; MASS SCREENING; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; PARITY; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PLANNING TECHNIQUES; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMEN; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REMINDER SYSTEMS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; WRITING;

EID: 7644236074     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Sutton S. Predicting and explaining intentions and behavior: how well are we doing? J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28:1998;1317-1338
2. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. 50:1991;179-211
3. Leventhal H., Singer R., Jones S. Effects of fear and specificity of recommendation upon attitudes and behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2:1995;20-29
4. Leventhal H., Watts J.C., Pagano F. Effects of fear and instructions on how to cope with danger. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 6:1967;313-321
5. Witte K., Allen M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ. Behav. 2:2000;591-615
6. Greenberger D, Padesky CA. Mind over mood. London: The Guilford Press; 1995.
7. Gollwitzer PM. Goal achievement: the role of intentions. In: Hewstone M, Stroebe W, editors. European review of social psychology, vol. 4. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1993. p. 141-85.
8. Gollwitzer P.M. Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. Am. Psychol. 54:1999;493-503
9. Sheeran P. Intention-behaviour relations: a conceptual and empirical review. In: Hewstone M, Stroebe W, editors. European review of social psychology, vol. 11. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2002.
10. Orbell S., Sheeran P. Motivational and volitional processes in action initiation: a field study of the role of implementation intentions. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 30:2000;780-797
11. Sheeran P., Orbell S. Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychol. 19:2000;283-289
12. National Screening Committee. Second report of the UK National Screening Committee. London: Department of Health; 2000.
13. Marteau T.M., Dormandy E., Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expectations. 4:2001;99-108
14. Dormandy E., Hooper R., Michie S., Marteau T.M. Informed choice to undergo prenatal screening: a comparison of two hospitals conducting testing either as part of a routine visit or requiring a separate visit. J. Med. Screen. 9:2002;109-114
15. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112:1992;155-159
16. Wardle J., Sutton S., Williamson S., Taylor T., McCaffery K., Cuzick J., et al. Psychosocial influences on older adults' interest in participating in bowel cancer screening. Prev. Med. 31:2000;323-334
17. Schwartz C., Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutic trials. J. Chron. Dis. 20:1967;637-648