Science teachers and technology teachers developing electronics and electricity courses together

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 435-446

  Lavonen, Jari ^a   Meisalo, Veijo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7644229067     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/095006900289831     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arnold, M. and Millar, R. (1994) Teaching about electric circuits: A constructivistic approach. In. R. Levinson (ed.), Teaching Science (London: Routledge), 49-53.
2. Beck, P. and Caspers, A (1982) Planung, Herstellung und spielerischen Einsatz eines elekrischen Geschicklichkeitsspieles-des ‘Elektrischen Irrgartens’. Zeitschrift für Technik im Unterricht, 25, 32-38.
3. Black, J. and Atkin, J. M. (eds) (1996) Changing the Subject: Innovations in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education (London: Routledge in association with OECD).
4. Bowyer, J. (1990) Scientific and Technological Literacy: Education for Change. Paper presented as a Special Study for the World Conference on Education for All (Thailand). ERIC ED 344758.
5. Cohen, L. and Manion, L. (1986) Research Methods in Education (London: Croom Helm).
6. Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design of analysis issues for field settings (Chicago: Rand McNally).
7. Driver, R. and Scott, P. (1996) Curriculum development as research: A constructivist approach to science curriculum development and teaching. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit and B. J. Fraser (eds), Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics (New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University), 94-107.
8. Duit, R. and Confrey, J. (1996) Reorganizing the curriculum and teaching to improve learning in science and mathematics. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit and B. J. Fraser. (eds), Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathetmatics (New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University), 79-93.
9. Fordyce, D. (1992) The Nature of Students Learning in Engineering. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 2, 22-40.
10. Fullan, M. (1991) The New Meaning of Educational Change (London: Cassell).
11. Fullan, M. and Pomfret, A. (1977) Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47, 355-397.
12. Gott, R. and Duggan, S. (1996) Practical work: its role in the understanding of evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 791-806.
13. Hacker, M. and Barden, R. (1988) Living with technology (New York: Delmar).
14. Herschbach, D. R. (1995) Technology as knowledge: implications for instruction. Journal of Technology Education, 77, 31-42.
15. Jarvis, T. (1993) Teaching design and technology in the primary School (London: Routledge).
16. Koballa, T., Kemp, A. and Evans, R. (1997) The spectrum of scientific literacy. Science Teacher, 64, 27-31.
17. Lavonen, J., Lindh, M., Antila, T. and Autio, O. (1995) Elektroniikka omaksi [Get Electronics] (Helsinki: Weilin & G'oos).
18. Lavonen, J., Lindh, M., Antila, T. and Autio, O. (1997) Elektronikka omaksi: Opettajan opas [Get Electronics: Teachers guide] (Lahti: MFKA Kustannus Oy).
19. Lavonen, J., Meisalo, V., Autio, O. and Lindh, M. (1998) Elektroniikan ja sahkotekniikan perusteet yleissivistavassa koulussa. Helsingin yliopiston opettajankoulutuslaitos. T ukimuksia 193.
20. Levinson, R., Murphy, P. and McCormic, R. (1997) Science and technical concepts in a design and technology project: A pilot study. Research in Science & Technological Education, 15, 235-275.
21. O’ Hearn, G. T. (1975) Science Literacy and Alternative Futures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (Los Angeles, California). ERIC ED 108867.
22. Page, R. (1986) VII Planning the technology curriculum: Developments in CDT departments. In A. Cross and B. McCormic (eds), Technology in schools (Philadelphia: Open University Press), 326-328.
23. Raat, J. and de Vries, M. (eds) (1986) What do Girls and Boys think of Technology? Pupils’ Attitudes towards Technology (Eindhoven: University of Technology).
24. Riggs, A. and Conway, R. (1991) Values and technology education. The Journal of the Design & Technology Teaching, 24, 31-33.
25. SATIS (1987) Science & Technology in Society 1 (Hatfield: The Association for Science Education).
26. Sellwood, P. (1991) The investigative learning process. The Journal of the Design & Technology Teaching, 24, 4-12.
27. Shamos, M. (1995) The myth of scientific literacy (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).
28. Treagust, D. F., Duit, R. and Fraser, B. J. (eds) (1996) Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics (New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University).
29. Wier, E. A. (1991) Scientists and Elementary Teachers: Partners in Science Teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (Lake Geneva, WI). ERIC ED 342618.
30. Yager, R. E. (1996) Science/Technology/Society As Reform in Science Education (Albany: State University of New York).
31. Zuga, K. F. (1996) Are there components of technological literacy? In D. Mioduser and I. Zilberstein (eds), JISTEC 96: Book of Abstracts (Tel-Aviv: The Centre for Educational Technology), 2-3, 14.