Negotiating participatory irrigation management in the Indian Himalayas

Agricultural Water Management

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 651-658

  Saravanan, V S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bayesian network; Institutional integration; Integrated water management; Policy modelling; South Asia

Indexed keywords

CONTEXTUAL FACTORS; CULTURAL SETTINGS; ECOLOGICAL FACTORS; EMBEDDED ACTORS; GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS; HIMALAYAS; INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT; INTEGRATED WATER MANAGEMENT; IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATORY IRRIGATION MANAGEMENTS; POLICY MODELLING; POLICY PROCESS; POLICY STATEMENTS; POWER CAPTURE; RESEARCH METHODS; SOUTH ASIA; USER GROUPS; WATER DISTRIBUTIONS; WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; WATER USE; WATER USER GROUPS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER NETWORKS; ECOLOGY; INFERENCE ENGINES; INTELLIGENT NETWORKS; INTERMODULATION; INTERMODULATION MEASUREMENT; IRRIGATION; MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

WATER CONSERVATION;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; POLICY STRATEGY; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; RURAL AREA; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WATER USE;

SIWALIK HILLS;

EID: 76349088728     PISSN: 03783774     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barton D., Saloranta T., Moe S.J., Eggestad H.O., and Kuikka S. Bayesian belief networks as a meta-modelling tool in integrated river basin management-pros and cons in evaluating nutrient abatement decisions under uncertainty in a Norwegian river basin. Ecol. Econ. 66 (2008) 91-104
2. Batchelor C., and Cain H.O. Application of belief networks to water management studies. Agric. Water Manage. 40 (1999) 51-57
3. Bromley J. Guidelines for the Use of Bayesian Networks as a Participatory Tool for Water Resource Management (2005), Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxford
4. Cain D.J. Planning Improvements in Natural Resources Management: Guidelines for Using Bayesian Networks to Support the Planning and Management of Development Programs in the Water Sector and Beyond (2001), Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxford
5. Campbell L.J. Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory Soc. 27 (1998) 377-409
6. Crawford S.E.S., and Ostrom E. Grammar of Institutions. Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 89 (1995) 582-600
7. DoR. Misal Hakikat Bandopast-Bikram Bagh Panchayat (1890), Department of Revenue, Government of Himachal Pradesh, Nahan
8. GoI. From Hariyali to Neeranchal: Report of the Technical Committee on Watershed Programs in India (2006), Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India, New Delhi
9. GoI. Common Guidelines for Watershed Development Projects (2008), Report for Government of India New Delhi
10. IDS. Understanding Policy Processes: A Review of IDS Research on the Environment (2006), Report for Knowledge, Technology and Society Team, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Sussex
11. Keeley, J., Scoones. I., 1999. Understanding environmental policy processes: a review. IDS Working Paper 89, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Sussex.
12. Lafferty W., and Hovden E. Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environ. Pol. 12 3 (2003) 1-22
13. In: Lenschow A. (Ed). Environmental Policy Integration: Greening Sectoral Policies in Europe (2002), Earthscan, London
14. Livingston M.L. Evaluating the performance of environmental policy: contributions of neoclassical, public choice, and institutional models. J. Econ. Issues 21 (1987) 281-294
15. In: Mitchell B. (Ed). Institutional Arrangements for Water Management: Canadian Experiences (1975), Department of Geography, Faculty of Environmental Studies, University of Waterloo, Ontario
16. Mollinga P.P., Doraiswamy R., and Engbersen K. Participatory irrigation management in Andhra Pradesh, India: policy implementation and transformation in the Tungabhadra Right Bank Low Level Canal. Paper presented at the 8th biennial conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP). Bloomington, Indiana, USA, 31 May-4 June (2000)
17. Mooij, J., 2003. Smart governance? Politics in the policy process in Andhra Pradesh, India. Overseas Development Institute Working Paper 228, Overseas Development Institute, London.
18. Ostrom E. The institutional analysis and development approach. In: Loehman E.T., and Kilgour D.M. (Eds). Designing Institutions for Environmental and Resource Management (1998), Edward Edgar Publishing Limited, Massachusetts 68-90
19. Ostrom E., Gardner R., and Walker J. Institutional Analysis and Common-Pool Resources (1994), The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
20. Sabatier P.A. Fostering the development of policy theory. In: Sabatier P.A. (Ed). Theories of Policy Process (1999), Westview Press, Colorado, United States and Oxford, United Kingdom 261-275
21. Shah M. Towards reforms. Econ. Pol. Weekly 41 26-27 (2006) 2981-2984
22. Sutton, R., 1999. The policy process: an overview. Overseas Development Institute Working Paper 118, Overseas Development Institute, London.
23. Swain M., and Das D.K. Participatory irrigation management in India: implementations and gaps. J. Dev. Sustain. Agric. 3 (2008) 28-39
24. Uusitalo L. Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Ecol. Mod. 203 (2007) 312-318