Auditor tenure and the ability to meet or beat earnings forecasts

Contemporary Accounting Research

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 517-548

  Davis, Larry R ^a   Soo, Billy S ^b   Trompeter, Gregory M ^c  

^a MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Analyst forecasts; Auditor tenure; Discretionary accruals; Earnings management

Indexed keywords

EID: 76249128977     PISSN: 08239150     EISSN: 19113846     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1506/car.26.2.8     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Abarbanell, J., and R. Lehavy. 2003. Biased forecasts or biased earnings? The role of reported earnings in explaining apparent bias and over/underreaction in analysts' earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting and Economics 36(1-3):105-46.
2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1978. The Commission on Auditors' Responsibilities: Report, conclusions and recommendations. New York: AICPA.
3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1987. Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. New York: AICPA.
4. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1992. SEC Practice Section: Statement of position regarding mandatory rotation of audit firms of publicly held companies. New York: AICPA.
5. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1997. In the public interest: A new conceptual framework for auditor independence. New York: AICPA.
6. Anthony, J., and K. Ramesh. 1992. Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices: A test of the life cycle hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 15(2-3):203-27.
7. Arruñada, B., and C. Paz-Ares. 1997. Mandatory rotation of company auditors: A critical examination. International Review of Law and Economics 17(1):31-61.
8. Atiase, R. 1985. Predisclosure information, firm capitalization and security price behavior around earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research 23(1):21-36.
9. Bartov, E., and D. Cohen. 2006. Mechanisms to meet/beat analysts' earnings expectations in the pre-and post-Sarbanes-Oxley eras. Working paper, New York University.
10. Bartov, E., D. Givoly, and C. Hayn. 2002. The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33(2):173-204.
11. Bazerman, M., K. Morgan, and G. Lowenstein. 1997. The impossibility of auditor independence. Sloan Management Review 38(4):89-94.
12. Becker, C., M. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15(1):1-24.
13. Belsley, D. A., E. Kuh, and R. E. Welsch. 1980. Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14. Biggs, J. 2002. Testimony given to the U. S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. Oversight hearing on accounting and investor protection issues raised by Enron and other public companies. February 27.
15. Brody, R., and S. Moscove. 1998. Mandatory auditor rotation. National Public Accountant. 43(3):32-35.
16. Brown, L. 1997. Analyst forecasting errors: Additional evidence. Financial Analysts' Journal 53(6):81-8.
17. Brown, L., and M. Caylor. 2005. A temporal analysis of quarterly earnings thresholds: Propensities and valuation consequences. The Accounting Review 80(2):423-40.
18. Brown, P., G. Foster, and E. Noreen. 1985. Security analyst multi-year earnings forecasts and the capital market, Studies in Accounting Research no. 21. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
19. Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichev. 1997. Earnings, adaptation and equity value. The Accounting Review 72(2):187-215.
20. Burgstahler, D., and M. Eames. 2003. Earnings management to avoid losses and earnings decreases: Are analysts fooled? Contemporary Accounting Research 20(2):253-94.
21. Cahan, S., and W. Zhang. 2006. After Enron: Auditor conservatism and ex-Andersen clients. The Accounting Review 81(1):49-82.
22. Caramanis, C., and C. Lennox. 2008. Audit effort and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45(1):116-38.
23. Carcello, J., and A. Nagy. 2004. Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(2):55-69.
24. Casterella, J., W. R. Knechel, and P. Walker. 2004. Factors affecting the influence of auditor tenure on auditor judgment. Working paper, University of Florida.
25. Chevis, G., S. Das, and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 2002. An empirical analysis of firms that meet or exceed analysts' earnings forecasts. Working paper, Texas A&M University.
26. Cohen, D., A. Dey, and T. Lys. 2008. Real and accruals-based earnings management in the pre-and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. The Accounting Review 83(3):757-87.
27. Commission on Public Trust and Private Enterprise. 2003. Findings and recommendations part 2: Corporate governance part 3: Audit and accounting. New York: Conference Board.
28. Copeland, J. 2002. Restoring confidence in the American financial system: Tough reforms are needed. Vital Speeches of the Day 68(15):456-61.
29. Cox, C. 2006. Testimony concerning the impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by the chair of the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission before the U. S. House Committee on Financial Services, September 19.
30. DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3(3):183-99.
31. Dechow, P. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18(1):3-42.
32. Dechow, P., and I. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement) : 35-59.
33. DeFond, M., and C. W. Park. 1997. Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 23(2):115-40.
34. DeFond, M., K. Raghunandan, and K. R. Subramanyam. 2002. Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research 40(4):1247-74.
35. DeFond, M., and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. Auditor changes and discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25(1):35-68.
36. Degeorge, F., J. Patel, and R. Zeckhauser. 1999. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. Journal of Business 72(1):1-33.
37. Dopuch, N., R. King, and R. Schwartz. 2001. An experimental investigation of retention and rotation requirements. Journal of Accounting Research 39(1):93-117.
38. Elgers, P., R. Pfeiffer, and S. Porter. 2003. Anticipatory income smoothing: A reexamination. Journal of Accounting and Economics 35(3):405-22.
39. Elliott, R., K. Eddy, O. Kirtley, and B. Melancon. 2000. Proposed federal regulation threatens CPA profession by limiting scope of CPA services. Letter to AICPA members. August 10. New York: AICPA.
40. Francis, J., and K. Krishnan. 1999. Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research 16(1):135-66.
41. Ffankel, R., M. Johnson, and K. Nelson. 2002. The relation between auditors' fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement) : 71-105.
42. Fried, D., and D. Givoly. 1982. Financial analysts' forecasts of earnings: A better surrogate for market expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 4(2):85-107.
43. Geiger, M., and K. Raghunandan. 2002. Bankruptcies, audit reports and the Reform Act: A note. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20(1):67-78.
44. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2003. Public accounting firms: Required study on the potential effects of mandatory audit firm rotation. Washington, DC: GAO.
45. Ghosh, A., and D. Moon. 2005. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review 80(2):585-612.
46. Gow, I., G. Ormazabal, and D. Taylor. 2008. Correcting for cross-sectional and time-series dependence in accounting research. Working paper, Stanford University.
47. Graham, J., C. Harvey, and S. Rajgopal. 2005. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40(1):3-73.
48. Gul, F. A., C. J. P. Chen, and J. S. L. Tsui. 2003. Discretionary accounting accruals, managers' incentives, and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 20(3):441-64.
49. Gul, F. A., B. Jaggi, and G. Krishnan. 2007. Auditor independence: Evidence on the joint effects of auditor tenure and non-audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 26(2):117-42.
50. Hanlon, M., S. Rajgopal, and T. Shevlin. 2003. Are executive stock options associated with future earnings? Journal of Accounting and Economics 36(1-3):3-43.
51. Heninger, W. 2001. The association between auditor litigation and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 76(1):111-26.
52. Hribar, P., and D. Collins. 2002. Errors in estimating accruals: Implications for empirical work. Journal of Accounting Research 40(1):105-34.
53. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW). 2002. Mandatory rotation of audit firms. London: ICAEW.
54. Johnson, V., I. Khurana, and J. K. Reynolds. 2002. Audit-firm tenure and the quality of audit reports. Contemporary Accounting Research 19(2):637-60.
55. Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29(2):193-228.
56. Kasznik, R., and M. McNichols. 2002. Does meeting expectations matter? Evidence from analyst forecast revisions and share prices. Journal of Accounting Research 40(3):727-59.
57. Kennedy, P. 1985. A guide to econometrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Knechel, W. R., and A. Vanstraelen. 2007. The relationship between auditor tenure and audit quality implied by going concern opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 26(1):113-31.
59. Kothari, S. P., A. Leone, and C. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39(1):163-97.
60. Levitt, A. 1998. The numbers game. Remarks at the NYU Center for Law and Business, September 28.
61. Lopez, T. J., and L. Rees. 2002. The effect of beating and missing analysts' forecasts on the information content of unexpected earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 17(2):155-84.
62. Lys, T., and L. Soo. 1995. Analysts' forecast precision as a response to competition. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 10(4):751-65.
63. Mansi, S., W. Maxwell, and D. Miller. 2004. Does auditor quality and tenure matter to investors? Evidence from the bond market. Journal of Accounting Research 42(4):755-93.
64. Matsumoto, D. 2002. Management's incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. The Accounting Review 77(3):483-514.
65. McNichols, M., and G. P. Wilson. 1988. Evidence of earnings management from the provision for bad debts. Journal of Accounting Research 26(Supplement):1-31.
66. Melancon, B. 2002. Statement of Barry Melancon, president and CEO of the AICPA to the Committee on Financial Services, US House of Representatives. March 13.
67. Moore, D., P. Tetlock, L. Tanlu, and M. Bazerman. 2006. Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Academy of Management Review 31(1):10-29.
68. Myers, J., L. Myers, and T. Omer. 2003. Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory rotation? The Accounting Review 78(3):779-800.
69. Meyers, J., L. Meyers, Z. V. Palmrose, and S. Scholz. 2004. Mandatory auditor rotation: Evidence from restatements. Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
70. Neter, J., W. Wasserman, and M. Kunter. 1990. Applied linear statistical models. New York: McGraw-Irwin.
71. New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). 2003. Final NYSE corporate governance rules. New York: NYSE.
72. O'Brien, P. 1988. Analysts' forecasts as earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 10(1):53-83.
73. Petersen, M. 2008. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies 22(1):435-80.
74. Pitt, H. 2002. Written testimony concerning accounting and investor protection issues raised by Enron and other public companies: Before the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, U. S. Senate, March 21.
75. PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2002. Mandatory rotation of audit firms: Will it improve audit quality? New York: PricewaterhouseCoopers.
76. Public Oversight Board (POB). 2002. Final annual report 2001. Stamford, CT: POB.
77. Raghunathan, B., B. Lewis, and J. Evans III. 1994. An empirical investigation of problem audits. Research in Accounting Regulation 8: 33-58.
78. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 2002. HR 3763.
79. Schwartz, K., and K. Menon. 1985. Auditor switches by failing firms. The Accounting Review 60(2):248-61.
80. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 1999. Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99: Materiality. Washington, DC: SEC.
81. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2001. Revision of the commission's auditor independence requirements (33-7919). Washington, DC: SEC.
82. Seidman, E. 2001. Testimony given to the U. S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. Oversight Hearing on the Failure of Superior Bank, Federal Savings Bank. September 11.
83. Thomas, J., and S. Tung. 1992. Cost manipulation incentives under cost reimbursement: Pension costs for defense contracts. The Accounting Review 67(4):691-711.
84. Trumka, R. 2001. Request for rulemaking concerning definition of independent auditor and limiting services accounting firms may provide to audit clients. Letter to the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission. http://www.sec.gov/rules/petitions/petn4-448.htm.
85. Turner, L. 1999. Call for academic research on key accounting issues. http://www.sec.gov/news/extra/aaacall.htm.
86. Turner, L., and J. Godwin. 1999. Auditing, earnings management, and international accounting issues at the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accounting Horizons 13(3):281-97.