Comparing patient outcomes after THA and TKA: Is there a difference?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 468, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 542-546

  Bourne, Robert B ^a   Chesworth, Bert ^a   Davis, Aileen ^a   Mahomed, Nizar ^a   Charron, Kory ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANALGESIA; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT STIFFNESS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGISTER; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 76249100347     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1046-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Physical status score. Available at: http://www.asahq.org/physicalstatus.htm. Accessed February 21, 2006.
2. JG Anderson RL Wixson D Tsai SD Stulberg RW Chang 1996 Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75 J Arthroplasty. 11 831 840 10.1016/S0883-5403(96)80183-5 1:STN:280: DyaK2s%2FovVertw%3D%3D 8934323
3. N Bellamy 2002 WOMAC: a 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire J Rheumatol. 29 2473 2476 12465137
4. Bellamy N. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index: A User's Guide IX. London, Ontario, Canada: Professor Nicholas Bellamy; 2009.
5. N Bellamy WW Buchanan CH Goldsmith J Campbell LW Stitt 1988 Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee J Rheumatol. 15 1833 1840 1:STN:280: DyaL1M7lslCrsQ%3D%3D 3068365
6. RB Bourne RW McCalden SJ MacDonald L Mokete J Guerin 2007 Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11 years follow-up Clin Orthop Relat Res. 464 27 31 17891041
7. RB Bourne WJ Sibbald G Doig L Lee S Adolph D Robertson M Provencher 2001 The Southwestern Ontario Joint Replacement Pilot Project: electronic point-of-care data collection. Southwestern Ontario Study Group Can J Surg. 44 199 202 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzksVOqtQ%3D%3D 11407830
8. BM Chesworth NN Mahomed RB Bourne AM Davis 2008 Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery J Clin Epidemiol. 61 907 918 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.014 18687289
9. Dillman D. Mail and Electronic Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2000.
10. I Escobar JM Quintana A Bilboa I Arostegai I Lafuente I Vidarreta 2007 Responsiveness and clinically important differences for WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 15 273 280 10.1016/j.joca.2006. 09.001 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s7gs1elsQ%3D%3D 17052924 (Pubitemid 46249668)
11. O Ethgen O Bruyere R Richy C Dardenne JV Reginster 2004 Health-related quality of life in total hip and knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systemic review of the literature J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86 963 974 15118039
12. PR Fortin AE Clarke L Joseph MH Liang M Tanzer D Ferland C Phillips AJ Partridge P Belisle AH Fossel N Mahomed CB Sledge JN Katz 1999 Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement. Preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery Arthritis Rheum. 42 1722 1728 10.1002/1529-0131(199908) 42:8<1722::AID-ANR22>3.0.CO;2-R 1:STN:280:DyaK1MznsVGguw%3D%3D 10446873 (Pubitemid 30263642)
13. Guideline for Wait Time Thresholds for Total Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery Based on Severity. Detailed Report. London, Ontario: Ontario Joint Replacement Registry; 2006.
14. AJ Janse RJ Gemke CS Uiterwaal I van der Tweel JL Kimpen G Sinnema 2004 Quality of life: patients and doctors don't always agree; a meta-analysis J Clin Epidemiol. 57 653 661 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.11.013 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2cvltVCntw%3D%3D 15358393 (Pubitemid 39198951)
15. CA Jones DC Voaklander ME Suarez-Almazon 2001 The effect of age on pain, function and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplasty Arch Intern Med. 161 454 460 10.1001/archinte.161.3.454 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7otVWhsw%3D%3D 11176772
16. A Laupacis RB Bourne CH Rorabeck D Feeny G Wong P Tugwell K Leslie R Bullas 1993 The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life J Bone Joint Surg Am. 75 1619 1629 1:STN:280: DyaK2c%2FmsVOjtg%3D%3D 8245054
17. N Mahomed CB Sledge L Daltroy A Fossel J Katz 1998 Self-administered satisfaction scale for joint replacement arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br. 80 63 69 10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.7859 (Pubitemid 28048491)
18. NN Mahomed MH Liang EF Cook LH Daltroy PR Fortin AH Fossel JN Katz 2002 The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty J Rheumatol. 29 1273 1279 12064846
19. JM Quintana A Escobar A Bilbao I Arostegai I Lafuente I Vidaurreta 2005 Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 13 1076 1083 10.1016/j.joca.2005.06.012 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MnjtVOrsQ%3D%3D 16154777 (Pubitemid 41672505)
20. CH Rorabeck RB Bourne A Laupacis D Feeny C Wong P Tugwell K Leslie R Bullas 1994 A double-blind study of 250 cases comparing cemented with cementless total hip arthroplasty. Cost effectiveness and its impact on health-related quality of life Clin Orthop Relat Res. 298 156 164 8118970