Patients' preferences for scoliosis brace treatment: A discrete choice experiment

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 57-63

  Bunge, Eveline M ^a   Bekker Grob, Esther W De ^a   Van Biezen, Frans C ^a   Essink Bot, Marie Louise ^a,b   De Koning, Harry J ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Boston brace; Brace treatment; Discrete choice experiment; Idiopathic scoliosis; Patient preferences

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK REDUCTION;

ADOLESCENT; BRACES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCOLIOSIS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 76149130391     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bdeaa6     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Campbell W, Canale ST, Daugherty K, et al. Scoliosis and kyphosis. In: ST C, ed. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2003: 1751-1984
2. Weinstein SL. Natural history. Spine 1999;24:2592-2600
3. Dolan LA, Weinstein SL. Surgical rates after observation and bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an evidence-based review. Spine 2007; 32(suppl 19):S91-100.
4. Goldberg CJ, Dowling FE, Hall JE, et al. A statistical comparison between natural history of idiopathic scoliosis and brace treatment in skeletally immature adolescent girls. Spine 1993;18:902-908
5. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 2008;371:1527-1537
6. Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST). Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00448448. Accessed November 13, 2009.
7. Matsunaga S, Hayashi K, Naruo T, et al. Psychologic management of brace therapy for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:547-550
8. Tones M, Moss N, Polly DW Jr. A review of quality of life and psychosocial issues in scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:3027-3038
9. Gyrd-Hansen D, Sogaard J. Analysing public preferences for cancer screening programmes. Health Econ 2001;10:617-634
10. Ryan M, Hughes J. Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. Health Econ 1997;6:261-273
11. Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ 2000;320:1530-1533
12. Sculpher M, Bryan S, Fry P, et al. Patients' preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: discrete choice experiment. BMJ 2004;328: 382.
13. de Bekker-Grob EW, Essink-Bot ML, Meerding WJ, et al. Patients' preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporosis Int 2008;19:1029-1037
14. Bunge EM, Juttmann RE, de Kleuver M, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after treatment: short-term effects after brace or surgical treatment. Eur Spine J 2007;16:83-89
15. Watson V, Ryan M, Brown CT, et al. Eliciting preferences for drug treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 172(6 Pt 1):2321-2325
16. Farrar S, Ryan M, Ross D, et al. Using discrete choice modelling in priority setting: an application to clinical service developments. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50:63-75.
17. Ryan M, Scott DA, Reeves C, et al. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Health Technol Assess 2001;5:1-186.
18. Hahn GJ, Shapiro SS. A Catalog and Computer Program for the Design and Analysis of Orthogonal Symmetric and Asymmetric Fractional Factorial Experiments. Schenectady, NY, USA: General Electric Research and Development Center; 1966.
19. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
20. Street DJ, Burgess L, Louviere J. Quick and easy choice sets: constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. Int J Res Market 2005;22:459-470
21. Dolan LA, Sabesan V, Weinstein SL, et al. Preference assessment of recruitment into a randomized trial for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:2594-2605
22. Snoek GJ, van Til JA, Krabbe PF, et al. Decision for reconstructive interventions of the upper limb in individuals with tetraplegia: the effect of treatment characteristics. Spinal Cord 2008;46:228-233
23. Danielsson AJ, Hasserius R, Ohlin A, et al. A prospective study of brace treatment versus observation alone in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a follow- up mean of 16 years after maturity. Spine 2007;32:2198-2207
24. Fernandez-Feliberti R, Flynn J, Ramirez N, et al. Effectiveness of TLSO bracing in the conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1995;15:176-181
25. Miller JA, Nachemson AL, Schultz AB. Effectiveness of braces in mild idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1984;9:632-635
26. Lloyd A, McIntosh E, Price M. The importance of drug adverse effects compared with seizure control for people with epilepsy: a discrete choice experiment. Pharmacoeconomics 2005;23:1167-1181
27. Mahadevia P, Shah S, Mannix S, et al. Willingness to pay for sensory attributes of intranasal corticosteroids among patients with allergic rhinitis. J Manag Care Pharm 2006;12:143-151
28. Lancsar EJ, Hall JP, King M, et al. Using discrete choice experiments to investigate subject preferences for preventive asthma medication. Respirology 2007;12:127-136