I won't do it! Self-prediction, moral obligation and moral deliberation

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 146, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 327-348

  Louise, Jennie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Actualism; Obligation; Possibilism; Prediction; Wrongdoing

Indexed keywords

EID: 76149107467     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-008-9258-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bergström, L. (1977). Utilitarianism and future mistakes. Theoria, 43(2), 84-102.
2. Bykvist, K. (2002). Alternative actions and the spirit of consequentialism. Philosophical Studies, 107, 45-68. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1013191909430.
3. Carlson, E. (1999). Consequentialism, alternatives, and actualism. Philosophical Studies, 96, 253-268. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1004239306956.
4. Carlson, E. (2002). Deliberation, foreknowledge, and morality as a guide to action. Erkenntnis, 57, 71-89. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1020146102680.
5. Goldman, H. S. (1976). Dated rightness and moral imperfection. The Philosophical Review, 85(4), 449-487. doi: 10. 2307/2184275.
6. Goldman, H. S. (1978). Doing the best one can. In A. Goldman & J. Kim (Ed.), Values and morals (pp. 185-214). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
7. Greenspan, P. S. (1975). Conditional oughts and hypothetical imperatives. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(10), 259-276. doi: 10. 2307/2024734.
8. Humberstone, L. (1983). The background of circumstances. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64, 19-34.
9. Jackson, F. (1985). On the semantics and logic of obligation. Mind, 94(374), 177-195. doi: 10. 1093/mind/XCIV. 374. 177.
10. Jackson, F. (1991). Decision-theoretic consequentialism and the nearest and dearest objection. Ethics, 101(3), 461-482. doi: 10. 1086/293312.
11. Jackson, F., & Pargetter, R. (1986). Oughts, options, and actualism. The Philosophical Review, 95(2), 233-255. doi: 10. 2307/2185591.
12. Kennett, J., & Smith, M. (2004). Philosophy and commonsense: The case of weakness of will. (Reprinted in Ethics and the a priori). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Levi, I. (1977). Consequentialism and sequential choice. (Reprinted in The covenant of reason). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Moran, R. (2001). Authority and estrangement: An essay on self-knowledge. NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
15. Schick, F. (1988). Self-knowledge, uncertainty, and choice. In Peter Gardenfors & Nils-Eric Sahlin (Eds.), Decision, probability and utility: Selected readings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Smith, M. (2004). Rational capacities, or: How to distinguish recklessness, weakness, and compulsion. (Reprinted in Ethics and the a priori). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Sobel, J. H. (1976). Utilitarianism and past and future mistakes. Nous (Detroit, Mich.), 10, 195-219. doi: 10. 2307/2214575.
18. Thomason, R. H. (1981). Deontic logic and the role of freedom in moral deliberation. In R. Hilpinen (Ed.), New studies in deontic logic (pp. 177-186). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
19. Vorobej, M. (2000). Prosaic possibilism. Philosophical Studies, 97, 131-136. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1008349904432.
20. Zimmerman, M. J. (1996). The concept of moral obligation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.