On the use of spatial regularization strategies to improve calibration of distributed watershed models

Water Resources Research

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Pokhrel, Prafulla ^a   Gupta, Hoshin V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION PROBLEMS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM; DISTRIBUTED MODEL INTERCOMPARISON PROJECTS; DISTRIBUTED WATERSHED MODELS; FLOW FORECASTING; HYDROGRAPHS; HYDROLOGIC MODELS; INPUT-OUTPUT DATA; INTERIOR POINT; MEAN VALUES; MODEL PARAMETERS; MODEL PERFORMANCE; PARAMETER DISTRIBUTIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATE; PARAMETER VALUES; PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS; PRIOR ESTIMATES; PRIOR INFORMATION; REGULARIZATION APPROACH; REGULARIZATION STRATEGIES; SPATIAL DOMAINS; SPATIAL INFORMATIONS; SPATIAL PARAMETERS; SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED MODELS; SQUASHING FUNCTIONS;

CALIBRATION;

CALIBRATION; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; WATERSHED;

EID: 76149086501     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2009WR008066     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Banta, E. R. (2000),MODFLOW-2000, the U. S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model; documentation of packages for simulating evapotranspiration with a segmented function (ETS1) and drains with return flow (DRT1), U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep., 2000-466, 209 pp.
2. Bartolino, J. R., and J. C. Cole (2002), Ground-water resources of the Middle Rio Grande Basin, New Mexico, U.S. Geol. Surv. Circ., 1222, 77 pp.
3. Cardenas, M. B., and J. L. Wilson (2006a), The influence of ambient groundwater discharge on exchange zones induced by current-bedform interactions, J. Hydrol., 331, 103-109, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol. 2006.05.012.
4. Cardenas, M. B., and J. L. Wilson (2006b), Hydrodynamics of coupled flow above and below a sediment-water interface with triangular bedforms, Adv. Water Resour., 30(3), 301-313, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres. 2006.06.009.
5. Cardenas, M. B., and J. L. Wilson (2007), Exchange across a sedimentwater interface with ambient groundwater discharge, J. Hydrol., 346, 69-80, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.08.019. (Pubitemid 47615032)
6. Cardenas, M. B., and V. A. Zlotnik (2003), Three-dimensional model of modern channel bend deposits, Water Resour. Res., 39(6), 1141, doi:10.1029/2002WR001383.
7. Carle, S. F. (1999), T-PROGS: Transition Probability Geostatistical Software, users manual version 2.1, 84 pp.Univ. of Calif., Davis.
8. Carle, S. F., and G. E. Fogg (1996), Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics, Math. Geol., 28(4), 453-476, doi:10.1007/BF02083656.
9. Carle, S. F., and G. E. Fogg (1997), Modeling spatial variability with one and multidimensional continuous-lag Markov chains, Math. Geol., 29(7), 891-918, doi:10.1023/A:1022303706942.
10. Carle, S. F., E. M. LaBolle, G. S. Weissmann, D. Van Brocklin, and G. E. Fogg (1998), Conditional simulation of hydrofacies architecture: A transition probability/Markov approach, in Hydrogeologic Models of Sedimentary Aquifers, Concepts Hydrogeol. Environ. Geol., vol.1, edited by G. S. Fraser and J. M. Davis, pp. 147- 170, Soc. for Sediment. Geol., Tulsa, Okla.
11. Cleverly, J. R., C. N. Dahm, J. R. Thibault, D. J. Gilroy, and J. E. Coonrod (2002), Seasonal estimates of actual evapo-transpiration from Tamarix ramosissima stands using three-dimensional eddy covariance, J. Arid Environ., 52, 181-197, doi:10.1006/jare.2002.0972. (Pubitemid 35400004)
12. Deutsch, C. V., and A. G. Journel (1998), GSLIB-Geostatistical Software Library Users Guide, 384 pp., Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
13. Domenico, P. J., and F. W. Schwartz (1998), Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology, 2nd ed., 582 pp., John Wiley, New York.
14. Fleckenstein, J., M. Anderson, G. Fogg, and J. Mount (2004), Managing surface water-groundwater to restore fall flows in the Cosumnes River, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 130(4), 301 - 310, doi:10.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9496(2004) 130:4(301).
15. Fleckenstein, J. H., R. G. Niswonger, and G. E. Fogg (2006), River/aquifer interactions, geologic heterogeneity, and low-flow management, Ground Water, 44(4), 837-852, doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00190.x. (Pubitemid 44657080)
16. Freyberg, D. L. (1988), An exercise in ground-water model calibration and prediction, Ground Water, 26(3), 350-360, doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584. 1988.tb00399.x.
17. Goovaerts, P. (1994), Comparison of CoIK, IK, mIK performances for modeling conditional probabilities of categorical variables, in Geostatistics for the Next Century, edited by R. Dimitrakopoulos, pp. 18 - 29, Kluwer Acad., Dordrecht, Netherlands.
18. Harbaugh, A. W., E. R. Banta, M. C. Hill, and M. G. McDonald (2000), MODFLOW-2000, the U. S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model-User guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep., 00-92, 107 pp.
19. Hawley, J. W., and C. S. Haase (Eds.) (1992), Hydrogeologic framework of the northern Albuquerque Basin, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep., 1978, 387 pp.
20. Hill, M. C. (1990), Preconditioned Conjugate-Gradient 2 (PCG2), a computer program for solving ground-water flow equations, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep. 90-4048, 43 pp.
21. Hornberger, G. M., J. P. Raffensperger, P. L. Wiberg, and K. N. Eshleman (1998), Elements of Physical Hydrology, 312 pp., Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Laurel, Md.
22. Isaaks, E. H., and R. M. Srivastava (1989), An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics, 592 pp., Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
23. Kernodle, J. M. (1998), Simulation of ground-water flow in the Albuquerque Basin, central New Mexico, 1901-95, with projections to 2020, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep., 96-209, 55 pp.
24. Kernodle, J. M., D. P. McAda, and C. R. Thorn (1995), Simulation of ground-water flow in the Albuquerque Basin, central New Mexico, with projections to 2020, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 94-4251, 114 pp.
25. Kollet, S. J., and V. A. Zlotnik (2003), Stream depletion predictions using pumping test data from a heterogeneous stream-aquifer system (a case study from the Great Plains, USA), J. Hydrol., 281, 96-114, doi:10.1016/S0022- 1694(03)00203-8. (Pubitemid 37261357)
26. Koltermann, C. E., and S. M. Gorelick (1996), Heterogeneity in sedimentary deposits: A review of structure-imitating, process-imitating, and descriptive approaches, Water Resour. Res., 32(9), 2617-2658, doi:10.1029/96WR00025. (Pubitemid 26350855)
27. Konrad, C. P. (2006), Longitudinal hydraulic analysis of river/aquifer exchanges, Water Resour. Res., 42, W08425, doi:10.1029/2005WR004197. (Pubitemid 44506746)
28. McAda, D. P., and P. Barroll (2002), Simulation of ground-water flow in the middle Rio Grande basin between Cochiti and San Acacia, New Mexico, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 02-4200, 81 pp.
29. Moore, S. J., and S. K. Anderholm (2002), Spatial and temporal variations in streamflow, dissolved solids, nutrients, and suspended sediment in the Rio Grande Valley study unit, Colorado, New Mexico and Texas, 1993- 95, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 02-4224, 52 pp.
30. Nagler, P. L., J. R. Cleverly, E. Glenn, D. Lampkin, A. Huete, and Z. Wan (2005), Predicting riparian evapotranspiration from MODIS vegetation indices and meteorological data, Remote Sens. Environ., 94, 17-30, doi:10.1016/j.rse. 2004.08.009. (Pubitemid 39527195)
31. Onta, P. R., A. Dasgupta, and R. Harboe (1991), Multistep planning model for conjunctive use of surface-water and ground-water resources, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 117(6), 662-678, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1991)117: 6(662).
32. Oreskes, N., K. Shrader-Frechette, and K. Belitz (1994), Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences, Science, 263, 641-646, doi:10.1126/science.263.5147.641.
33. Proce, C. J., R. W. Ritzi, D. F. Dominic, and Z. Dai (2004), Modeling multiscale heterogeneity and aquifer interconnectivity, Ground Water, 42(5), 658-670, doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2004.tb02720.x.
34. Regli, C., M. Rauber, and P. Huggenberger (2003), Analysis of aquifer heterogeneity within a well capture zone, comparison of model data with field experiments: A case study from the riverWiese, Switzerland, Aquat. Sci., 65, 111-128.
35. Reichard, E. G. (1995), Groundwater-surface water management with stochastic surface water supplies-A simulation optimization approach, Water Resour. Res., 31(11), 2845-2865, doi:10.1029/95WR02328. (Pubitemid 26435130)
36. Richard, G. A., P. U. Julien, and D. C. Baird (2005), Statistical analysis of lateral migration of the Rio Grande, New Mexico, Geomorphology, 71, 139-155, doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.07.013. (Pubitemid 41510181)
37. Ritzi, R. W. (2000), Behavior of indicator variograms and transition probabilities in relation to the variance in lengths of hydrofacies,Water Resour. Res., 36(11), 3375-3381, doi:10.1029/2000WR900139.
38. Roark, D. M. (2001), Estimation of hydraulic characteristics in the Santa Fe Group aquifer system using computer simulations of river and drain pulses in the Rio Bravo study area, near Albuquerque, New Mexico, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 01-4069, 52 pp.
39. Roelle, J. E., and W. W. Hagenbuck (1994), Surface cover maps of the Rio Grande floodplain from Velarde to Elephant Butte Reservoir, New Mexico, 57 pp., U.S. Geol. Surv., Fort Collins, Colo.
40. Sarris, T. S., and E. K. Paleologos (2004), Numerical investigation of the anisotropic hydraulic conductivity behavior in heterogeneous porous media, Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 18, 188-197, doi:10.1007/s00477-003-0171- 3. (Pubitemid 38861338)
41. Sophocleous, M. (2002), Interactions between groundwater and surface water: The state of the science, Hydrogeol. J., 10, 52- 67, doi:10.1007/ s10040-001-0170-178
42. Veenhuis, J. E. (2002), Summary of flow loss between selected cross sections on the Rio Grande in and near Albuquerque, New Mexico, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 02-4131, 30 pp.
43. Wang, C. C., B. Mortazavi, W. K. Liang, N. Z. Sun, and W. W. G. Yeh (1995), Model development for conjunctive use study of the San Jacinto Basin, California, Water Resour. Bull., 31(2), 227-241.
44. Weissmann, G. S., and G. E. Fogg (1999), Multi-scale alluvial fan heterogeneity modeled with transition probability geostatistics in a sequence stratigraphic framework, J. Hydrol., 226, 48-65, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(99) 00160-2. (Pubitemid 30028127)
45. Weissmann, G. S., S. F. Carle, and G. E. Fogg (1999), Three-dimensional hydrofacies modeling based on soil surveys and transition probability geostatistics, Water Resour. Res., 35(6), 1761-1770, doi:10.1029/ 1999WR900048.
46. Wentworth, C. K. (1922), A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments, J. Geol., 30, 377-392, doi:10.1086/622910.
47. Winograd, I. J. (1959), Ground water conditions and geology of Sunshine Valley and western Taos County, New Mexico, Tech. Rep. 12, 70 pp., N. M. Off. of the State Eng., Santa Fe.
48. Woessner,W.W. (2000), Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: Rescaling hydrogeologic thought, Ground Water, 38(3), 423-429, doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2000.tb00228.x.
49. Yeh, W. W.-G. (1986), Review of parameter identification procedures in groundwater hydrology: The inverse problem, Water Resour. Res., 22(2), 95-108, doi:10.1029/WR022i002p00095.