Corrigendum: An understanding of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on various nanostructured polymeric and metallic materials prepared by ionic plasma deposition (J Biomed Mater Res, (2010), 92A, (1190–1201), 10.1002/jbm.a.32433);An understanding of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on various nanostructured polymeric and metallic materials prepared by ionic plasma deposition

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1190-1201

  Pareta, Rajesh A ^a   Reising, Alexander B ^b   Miller, Tiffany ^c   Storey, Dan ^c   Webster, Thomas J ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Chameleon Scientific   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion; In vitro; Ionic plasma deposition; Nanotechnology; Orthopedics; Osteoblast; Plasma ion immersion implantation

Indexed keywords

ALIPHATIC COMPOUNDS; ALUMINA; ALUMINUM OXIDE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BONE; CELL ADHESION; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NITROGEN PLASMA; NONMETALLIC MATRIX COMPOSITES; ORTHOPEDICS; OSTEOBLASTS; PLASMA DEPOSITION; PLASTIC BOTTLES; POLYMERIC IMPLANTS; POLYVINYL CHLORIDES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TITANIUM ALLOYS; ULTRAHIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENES;

BONE-FORMING CELLS; DEPOSITION PROCESS; IN-VITRO; METALLIC IMPLANTS; NANO-SCALE ROUGHNESS; ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT; OSTEOBLAST ADHESION; PLASMA ION IMMERSION IMPLANTATION;

METAL IMPLANTS;

ALLOY; METAL; POLYMER;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL ADHESION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMERSION; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; LONGEVITY; METAL IMPLANTATION; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOBLAST; POLYMERIZATION;

EID: 75749149361     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37112     Document Type: Erratum

References (24)

1. Suchanek W, Yoshimura M. Processing and properties of hydroxyapatite-based biomaterials for use as hard tissue replacement implants. J Mater Res 1998;13:94-117.
2. Edwards JT, Brunski JB, Higuchi HW. Mechanical and morphologic investigation of the tensile strength of a bonehydroxyapatite interface. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:454-468.
3. Hench LL, Polak JM. Third-generation biomedical materials. Science 2002;295:1014-1017.
4. Gross KA, Berndt CC. Thermal processing of hydroxyapatite for coating production. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:580-587.
5. Heimann RB, Wirth R. Formation and transformation of amorphous calcium phosphates on titanium alloy surfaces during atmospheric plasma spraying and their subsequent in vitro performance. Biomaterials 2006;27:823-831.
6. Brett PM, Harle J, Salih V, Mihoc R, Olsen I, Jones FH, Tonetti M. Roughness response genes in osteoblasts. Bone 2004;35:124-133.
7. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:475-483.
8. Yap E, McCulloch DG, McKenzie DR, Swain MV, Wielunski LS, Clissold RA. Modification of the mechanical and optical properties of polycarbonate by 50-keV Ar+ and H+ ion implantation. J Appl Phys 1998;83:3404-3412.
9. Shuman D. Computerized image analysis software for measuring indents by AFM.Microscopy andAnalysis; 2005. p 21-23. 10. Wu S. Polymer Interface and Adhesion. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1982. p 178-181.
10. Oss CJV, Good RJ, Chaudhury MK. Additive and nonadditive surface tension components and the interpretation of contact angles. Langmuir 1988;4:884-891.
11. Mather JP, Roberts PE. Introduction to Cell and Tissue Culture: Theory and Technique. New York and London: Plenum Press; 1998.
12. Hench LL. Bioceramics: From concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc 1991;74:1487-1510.
13. Chen JS, Sun Z, Guo PS, Zhang ZB, Zhu DZ, Xu HJ. Effect of ion implantation on surface energy of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. J Appl Phys 2003;93:5103-5108.
14. Tsuji H, Satoh H, Ikeda S, Ikemoto N, Gotoh Y, Ishikawa J. Surface modification by silver-negative-ion implantation for controlling cell-adhesion properties of polystyrene. Surf Coat Technol 1998;103/104:124-128.
15. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, Howard VJ, Rumsfeld J, al TMe. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2006 update: A report from the American Heart Association statistics committee and stroke subcommittee. Circulation 2006;113:E85-E151.
16. Furlong R, Osborn JF. Fixation of hip protheses by hydroxyapatite ceramic coatings. J Bone Joint Surg B 2001;73:741-745.
17. Möller W, Mukherjee S. Plasma-based ion implantation. Curr Sci 2002;83:237-252.
18. Merritt M, Haberstroh KM, Storey D, Webster TJ. The effects of physiological flow on endothelial cell function on nanostructured coated vascular stent materials. Biomed Eng Soc Trans 2008;33.
19. Gutwein LG, Webster TJ. Increased viable osteoblast density in the presence of nanophase compared to conventional alumina and titania particles. Biomaterials 2004;25:4175-4183.
20. Webster TJ, Hellenmeyer EL, Price RL. Increased osteoblast functions on theta+delta nanofiber alumina. Biomaterials 2005;26:953-960.
21. Reising A, Yao C, Storey D, Webster TJ. Greater osteoblast long-term functions on ionic plasma deposited nanostructured orthopedic implant coatings. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2008;87:78-83.
22. Cohen A, Liu-Synder P, Storey D, Webster TJ. Decreased fibroblast and increased osteoblast functions on ionic plasma deposited nanostructured Ti coatings. Nanoscale Res Lett 2007;2:385-390.
23. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 1999;20:1221-1227.
24. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng 2001;7:291-301.