Differences in the daily symptoms associated with the silicone hydrogel contact lens wear

Eye and Contact Lens

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 49-53

  Martin, Raul ^a,b   Sanchez, Irene ^b   De La Rosa, Cristina ^b   De Juan, Victoria ^b   Rodriguez, Guadalupe ^b   De Paz, Isabel ^b   Zalama, Maria ^b  

^a School of Optometry   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adverse environments; Multipurpose solution; Silicone hydrogel contact lenses; Symptoms; Times of the day

Indexed keywords

CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; POLY(HEXAMETHYLENEBIGUANIDE);

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLURRED VISION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRY EYE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EPIPHORA; EXTENDED WEAR CONTACT LENS; EYE BURNING; EYE DISCHARGE; EYE DISCOMFORT; EYE DISEASE; EYE REDNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOTRAFILCON B; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCULAR PRURITUS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHOTOPHOBIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES, EXTENDED-WEAR; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; DRY EYE SYNDROMES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; PRESCRIPTIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FITTING; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SILICONE ELASTOMERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 75749145535     PISSN: 15422321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181c7bda6     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Pritchard N, Fonn D, Brazeau D. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: A survey. Int Contact Lens Clin 1999;26:157-162.
2. Dumbleton K, Keir N, Moezzi A, et al. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:758-768.
3. Guillon M, Maissa C. Dry eye symptomatology of soft contact lens wearers and nonwearers. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:829-834.
4. Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: The effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (Senofilcon A). Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:281-286.
5. Martín R, de Juan V, Rodríguez G, et al. Initial comfort of Lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses versus Etafilcon A contact lenses for extended wear. Cont Lens Ant Eye 2007;30:23-28.
6. Guillon M, Maissa C. Clinical acceptance of two multipurpose solutions: MPS containing HPMC versus citrate-based MPS without rubbing. CLAO J 2002;28:186-191.
7. Fonn D, Dumbleton K. Dryness and discomfort with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:101-104.
8. Chalmers RL, Begley CG. Dryness symptoms among an unselect clinical population with and without contact lens wear. Cont Lens Ant Eye 2006;29:25-30.
9. Richdale K, Sinnott LT, Skadahl E, et al. Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation. Cornea 2007;26:168-174.
10. Epstein AB. Contact lens care products effect on corneal sensitivity and patient comfort. Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:128-132.
11. Riley C, Chalmers RL, Pence N. The impact of lens choice in the relief of contact lens related symptoms and ocular surface findings. Cont Lens Ant Eye 2005;28:13-19.
12. Young J, Veys J, Pritchard N, et al. A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2002;22:516-527.
13. Dumbleton K, Woods C, Jones L, et al. Comfort and adaptation to silicone hydrogel lenses for daily wear. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34:215-223.
14. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B. Changes in ocular physiology, tear film characteristics, and symptomatology with 18 months silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:73-81.
15. Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Mitchell GL, et al. Characterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North America. Cornea 2001;20:610-618.
16. Stiegemeier MJ, Cedrone R, Evans D, et al. Clinical performance of no rub multi-purpose solutions. Cont Lens Ant Eye 2007;27:65-74.
17. Lievens CW, Hakin N, Chinn A. The effect of multipurpose solutions on the ocular surface. Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:8-11.
18. Young G, Riley CM, Chalmers RL, et al. Hydrogel lens comfort in challenging environments and the effect of refitting with silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:302-308.
19. Guillon M, Maissa C. Use of silicone hydrogel material for daily wear. Cont Lens Ant Eye 2007;30:5-10.
20. Lorentz H, Jones L. Lipid deposition on hydrogel contact lenses: How history can help us today. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:286-295.
21. Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, et al. An in vivo comparison of kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:503-510.
22. González-García MJ, González-Sáiz A, de la Fuente B, et al. Exposure to a controlled adverse environment impairs the ocular surface of subjects with minimally symptomatic dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48: 4026-4032.
23. Maruyama K, Yokoi N, Takamata A, et al. Effect of environmental conditions on tear dynamics in soft contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:2563-2568.
24. Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, et al. Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:40-46.
25. Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, King-Smith PE. Thinning rate of the precorneal and prelens tear films. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:2353-2361.
26. Choon Thai L, Tomlinson A, Doane MG. Effect of contact lens materials on tear physiology. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:194-204.
27. Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patient-related factors associated with contact lens-related dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:1319-1328.
28. Dillehay SM, Miller MB. Performance of Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:272-277.
29. Chalmers R, Long B, Dillehay S, et al. Improving contact-lens related dryness symptoms with silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85: 778-784.
30. Long B, McNally J. The clinical performance of a silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear in an Asian population. Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:65-71.
31. Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, et al. The performance of the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire as a screening survey for contact lens-related dry eye. Cornea 2002;21:469-475.
32. Nichols JJ, King-Smith PE. The impact of hydrogel lens settling on the thickness of the tears and contact lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45:2549-2554.
33. McCulley JP, Aronowicz JD, Uchiyama E, et al. Correlations in a change in aqueous tear evaporation with a change in relative humidity and the impact. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:758-760.
34. Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:753-761.