Seismic loss estimation based on end-to-end simulation

Life-Cycle Civil Engineering - Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering, IALCCE '08

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 215-220

  Muto, M ^a   Krishnan, S ^a   Beck, J L ^a   Mitrani Reiser, J ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING DAMAGE; BUILDING SITES; CONDITIONAL MEANS; CONTOUR PLOT; DAMAGE PREDICTION; ECONOMIC EFFECT; ECONOMIC LOSS; END-TO-END SIMULATION; ESTIMATION METHODOLOGIES; FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS; GROUND MOTIONS; INTERSTORY DRIFTS; LOS ANGELES BASIN; LOSS ANALYSIS; MOMENT-RESISTING CONNECTION; NON-STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS; NONLINEAR TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS; NORTHRIDGE; NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKES; PEAK FLOOR; PLUMBING SYSTEMS; REPAIR COSTS; SAN ANDREAS FAULT; SCENARIO EARTHQUAKES; SCENARIO EVENTS; SEISMIC EVENT; SEISMIC HAZARDS; SEISMIC LOSS ESTIMATION; SEISMIC RISK; SIMULATION RESULT; SOURCE MECHANISMS; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; STEEL FRAME BUILDINGS; STEEL MOMENT RESISTING FRAME; STRUCTURAL DAMAGES; STRUCTURAL MODELS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS; TRACTION ELEVATORS; VELOCITY MODEL;

BUILDINGS; EARTHQUAKES; ESTIMATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LIFE CYCLE; MODEL STRUCTURES; OPTICAL LOSSES; PLUMBING; REPAIR; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC WAVES; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 75749140227     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bonowitz, & Maison, B. 2003. Northridge welded steel moment-frame damage data and its use for rapid loss estimation. Earthquake Spectra 19(3): 335-364.
2. Carlson, A. 1999. Three-dimensional nonlinear inelastic analysis of steel moment frame buildings damaged by earthquake excitations. Report EERL 99-02, Earthquake Engineering Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
3. FEMA (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report FEMA 356. Federal Emergency Management Agency, USA.
4. Goulet, C, Haselton, C, Mitrani-Reiser, X, Beck, X, Deier-lein, G., Porter, K. & Stewart, X, 2007. Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building-from seismic hazard to collapse safety to economic loss. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 36:1973-1997. (Pubitemid 350042027)
5. Iwata, Y., Sugimoto, H., & Kuwamura, H. 2006. Reparability limit of steel structural buildings based on the actual data of Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake. Technical Memorandum of Public Works Research Institute 4022: 86-95.
6. Ji, C, Tan, Y., Helmberger, D., & Tramp, J. 2003. Modeling teleseismic P and SH static offsets for great strike-slip earthquakes. In Proceedings ofthe American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, USA.
7. Komatitsch, D. & Tromp, J. 1999. Introduction to the spectral element method for three-dimensional seismic wave propagation. Geophys. J. Int. 139: 806-822. (Pubitemid 30063571)
8. Krishnan, S. 2003. FRAME3D-a program for three-dimensional nonlinear time-history analysis of steel buildings: User guide. Report EERL 2003-03, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
9. Krishnan, S. & Hall, J. 2006a. Modeling steel frame buildings in three dimensions-Part I: Panel zone and plastic hinge beam elements. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 132(4): 345-358. (Pubitemid 43870514)
10. Krishnan, S. & Hall, J. 2006b. Modeling steel frame buildings in three dimensions-Part U: Elastofiber beam elements and examples. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 132(4): 359-374. (Pubitemid 43870515)
11. Krishnan, S., Ji, C, Komatitsch, D., & Tromp, J. 2005. Performance of 18-story steel moment frame buildings during a large San Andreas earthquake-a Southern California-wide end-to-end simulation. Report EERL 2005-01, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
12. Krishnan, S., Ji, C, Komatitsch, D., & Tromp, J. 2006a. Case studies of damage to tall steel moment frame buildings in southern California during large San Andreas earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96(4): 1523-1537. (Pubitemid 44295447)
13. Krishnan, S., Ji, C, Komatitsch, D., & Tromp, J. 2006b. Performance of two 18-story steel moment frame buildings in southern California during two large simulated San Andreas earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra 22(4): 1035-1061. (Pubitemid 44970873)
14. Mitrani-Reiser, J. 2007. An Ounce of Prevention: Probabilistic Loss Estimation for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering. Ph. D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
15. Moehle, J. & Deierlein, G. 2004. A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering. In International Workshop on Performance-Based Engineering, Bled, Slovenia.
16. Porter, K. 2000. Assembly-Based Vulnerability of Buildings and its Uses in Seismic Performance Evaluationand Risk-Management Decision-Making. Ph. D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
17. Porter, K. 2003. An overview of PEER'S performance-based earthquake engineering methodology. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, San Francisco, California, USA.
18. Porter, K. 2007. Fragility of hydraulic elevators for use in performance-based earthquake engineering. Earthquake Spectra 23(2): 459-469. (Pubitemid 46958316)
19. SAC. 1995. Analytical and field investigations of buildings affected by the Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994 - Part 2. Report SAC 95-04, Structural Engineers Association of California, Applied Technology Council, and California Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering, USA.