Performance of two 18-story steel moment-frame buildings in southern California during two large simulated San Andreas earthquakes

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1035-1061

  Krishnan, Swaminathan ^a   Ji, Chen ^b   Komatitsch, Dimitri ^c   Tromp, Jeroen ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE PAU ET DES PAYS DE L'ADOUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING CODES; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; PERFORMANCE; SEISMOLOGY;

NORTH-TO-SOUTH RUPTURE SCENARIO; NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE; PEAK INTERSTORY DRIFTS; SAN ANDREAS FAULT;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

BUILDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISPLACEMENT; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; GROUND MOTION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SAN ANDREAS FAULT; STEEL;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33845733693     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.2360698     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Agnew, D. C., and Sieh, K., 1978. A documentary study of the felt effects of the great California earthquake of 1857, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 68 (6), 1717-1729.
2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2000. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-356, Washington, D.C.
3. Anderson, J. G., Lee, Y., Zeng, Y., and Day, S. M., 1996. Control of strong motion by the upper 30 meters, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 86, 1749-1759.
4. Carlson, A., 1999. Three-dimensional Nonlinear Inelastic Analysis of Steel Moment-Frame Buildings Damaged by Earthquake Excitations, Technical Report EERL 99-02, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
5. Clouteau, D., and Aubry, D., 2001. Modifications of the ground motion in dense urban areas, J. Comput. Acoust. 9 (4), 1659-1675.
6. Darragh, R., Cao, T., Graizer, V., Shakal, A., and Huang, M., 1994. Los Angeles Code Instrumented Building Records from the Northridge, California Earthquake of January 17 1994: Processed Release No. 1, Technical Report OSMS 94-17, California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology (now California Geological Survey), Sacramento, CA.
7. El-Tawil, S., and Deierlein, G. G., 1996. Inelastic Dynamic Analysis of Mixed Steel-Concrete Space Frames, Technical Report Structural Engineering 96-05, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
8. Fenves, G. L., and Serino, G., 1990. Soil-structure interaction in buildings from earthquake records, Earthquake Spectra 6 (4), 641-655.
9. Filippou, F., and Romero, M. L., 1998. Nonlinear and dynamic analysis from research to practice, in N. K. Srivatsava (editor), Structural Engineering World Wide 1998, pp. T101-3. Elsevier Science Ltd., New York.
10. Graves, R. W., 1998. Three-dimensional finite-difference modeling of the San Andreas Fault: Source parameterization and ground-motion levels, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88 (4), 881-897.
11. Hall, J. F., 1998. Seismic response of steel frame buildings to near-source ground motions, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 27, 1445-1464.
12. Hall, J., Heaton, T., Halling, M., and Wald, D., 1995. Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings, Earthquake Spectra 11 (4), 569-605.
13. Haskell, N. A., 1960. Crustal reflection of plane SH waves, J. Geophys. Res. 4147-4150.
14. w 7.0 blind thrust earthquake, Science 267, 206-211.
15. International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO), 1982. 1982 Uniform Building Code, Volume 2, Whittier, CA.
16. International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO), 1997. 1997 Uniform Building Code, Volume 2, Whittier, CA.
17. Ji, C., Tan, Y., Helmberger, D., and Tromp, J., 2003. Modeling teleseismic P and SH static offsets for great strike-slip earthquakes, in Proceedings of the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting.
18. Kohler, M., Magistrale, H., and Clayton, R., 2003. Mantle heterogeneities and the SCEC three-dimensional seismic velocity model version 3, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 757-774.
19. Komatitsch, D., and Tromp, J., 1999. Introduction to the spectral element method for three-dimensional seismic wave propagation, Geophys. J. Int. 139, 806-822.
20. Komatitsch, D., Liu, Q., Tromp, J., Süss, P., Stidham, C., and Shaw, J. H., 2004. Simulations of ground motion in the Los Angeles Basin based upon the spectral element method, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, 187-206.
21. Krishnan, S., 2003a. FRAME3D - A Program for Three-dimensional Nonlinear Time-History Analysis of Steel Buildings: User Guide, Technical Report EERL 2003-03, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
22. Krishnan, S., 2003b. Three-dimensional Nonlinear Analysis of Tall Irregular Steel Buildings Subject to Strong Ground Motion, Technical Report EERL 2003-01, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
23. Krishnan, S., Ji, C., Komatitsch, D., and Tromp, J., 2005. Performance of 18-story Steel Moment-Frame Buildings during a Large San Andreas Earthquake - A Southern California-wide End-to-end Simulation, Technical Report EERL 2005-01, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
24. Krishnan, S., and Hall, J. F., 2006a. Modeling steel frame buildings in three dimensions - Part I: Panel zone and plastic hinge beam elements, J. Eng. Mech. 132 (4), 345-358.
25. Krishnan, S., and Hall, J. F., 2006b. Modeling steel frame buildings in three dimensions - Part II: Elastofiber beam element and examples, J. Eng. Mech. 132 (4), 359-374.
26. Kunnath, S. K., 1995. Enhancements to Program IDARC: Modeling Inelastic Behavior of Welded Connections in Steel Moment-Resisting Frames, Technical Report NIST GCR 95-673, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
27. Liu, Q., Polet, J., Komatitsch, D., and Tromp, J., 2004. Spectral-element moment tensor inversions for earthquakes in southern California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94 (5), 1748-1761.
28. Lobo, R., 1994. IDARC3D: Inelastic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures in Three Dimensions, Technical report, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo.
29. Lobo, R. F., Skokan, M. J., Huang, S. C., and Hart, G. C., 1998. Three-dimensional analysis of a 13-story steel building with weld connection damage, in N. K. Srivatsava (editor), Structural Engineering World Wide 1998, pp. T114-2, Elsevier Science Ltd., New York.
30. Magistrale, H., McLaughlin, K., and Day, S., 1996. A geology based 3-D velocity model of the Los Angeles Basin sediments, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 86, 1161-1166.
31. Magistrale, H., Day, S., Clayton, R., and Graves, R., 2000. The SCEC southern California reference three-dimensional seismic velocity model version 2, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90 (6B), S65-S76.
32. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., and Fenves, G. L., 2005. OpenSees Command Language Manual, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, University of California, Berkeley. http://opensees.berkeley.edu
33. Meltzner, A. J., and Wald, D. J., 1998. Foreshocks and Aftershocks of the Great 1857 California Earthquake, USGS Open-File Rep. 98-465, Pasadena, CA.
34. Olsen, K. B., Archuleta, R. J., and Matarese, J. R., 1995. Three dimensional simulation of a magnitude 7.75 earthquake on the San Andreas Fault, Science 270, 1628-1632.
35. Powell, G. H., and Campbell, S., 1994. DRAIN-3DX Element Description and User Guide for Element Type01, Type05, Type08, Type09, Type15, and Type17, Technical Report UCB/SEMM-94/08, Structural Engineering Mechanics and Materials, University of California, Berkeley.
36. Prakash, V., Powell, G. H., and Campbell, S., 1994. DRAIN-3DX Base Program Description and User Guide, Version 1.10, Technical Report UCB/ SEMM-94/07, Structural Engineering Mechanics and Materials, University of California, Berkeley.
37. SAC Joint Venture, 1995a. Analytical and Field Investigations of Buildings Affected by the Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994 - Part 1, Technical Report SAC 95-04, Part 1, Structural Engineers Association of California, Applied Technology Council, and California Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering.
38. SAC Joint Venture, 1995b. Analytical and Field Investigations of Buildings Affected by the Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994 - Part 2, Technical Report SAC 95-04, Part 2, Structural Engineers Association of California, Applied Technology Council, and California Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering.
39. SAC Joint Venture, 1995c. Surveys and Assessments of Damage to Buildings Affected by the Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994, Technical Report SAC 95-06, Structural Engineers Association of California, Applied Technology Council, and California Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering.
40. SAC Joint Venture, 2000a. Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-350, Washington, D.C.
41. SAC Joint Venture, 2000b. Recommended Specifications and Quality Assurance Guidelines for Steel Moment-Frame Construction for Seismic Applications, prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-353, Washington, D.C.
42. Serino, G., 1989. Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction in Building Response from Earthquake Records, Technical Report UCB/SEMM-1989/01, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
43. Sieh, K. E., 1978. Slip along the San Andreas Fault associated with the great 1857 earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 68 (5), 1421-1448.
44. Stewart, J. P., Seed, R. B., and Fenves, G. L., 1998. Empirical Evaluation of Inertial Soil-Structure Interaction Effects, Technical Report PEER-98/07, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California, Berkeley.
45. Süss, M. P., and Shaw, J. H., 2003. P-wave seismic velocity structure derived from sonic logs and industry reflection data in the Los Angeles Basin, J. Geophys. Res. 108 (B3) Article no. 2170.
46. Trifunac, M., Todorovska, M., and Hao, T., 2001a. Full-scale experimental studies of soil-structure interaction - A review, in Proceedings of the Second U S.-Japan Workshop on Soil-Structure Interaction, Tsukuba City, Japan, 52 pp. (CD-ROM).
47. Trifunac, M., Hao, T., and Todorovska, M., 2001b. Response of a 14-story Reinforced Concrete Structure to Nine Earthquakes: 61 Years of Observation in the Hollywood Storage Building, Technical Report CE 01-02, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
48. Weldon, R. J., Fumal, T. E., Biasi, G. P., and Scharer, K. M., 2005. Past and future earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault, Science 308, 966-967.