Repeat prostate biopsy accuracy: Simulator-based comparison of two- and three-dimensional transrectal US modalities

Radiology

Volumn 254, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 587-594

  Cool, Derek W ^a,b   Connolly, Michael J ^a   Sherebrin, Shi ^a   Eagleson, Roy ^a,b   Izawa, Jonathan I ^b   Amann, Justin ^a,b   Romagnoli, Cesare ^b   Romano, Walter M ^b   Fenster, Aaron ^a,b  

^a ROBARTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOGRAPHY; UNITED STATES; ADENOCARCINOMA; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOPSY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; RECTUM; RETREATMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOPSY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; RETREATMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 75749135529     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2542090674     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hricak H, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC, et al. Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. Radiology 2007;243(1):28-53. [Published correction appears in Radiology 2007;245(1)302.]
2. Sedelaar JP, Vijverberg PL, De Reijke TM, et al. Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: state of the art perspectives. Eur Urol 2001;40(3):275-284.
3. Xu S, Kruecker J, Turkbey B, et al. Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies. Comput Aided Surg 2008;13(5):255-264.
4. Lattouf JB, Grubb RL, Lee SJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-directed transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies in patients at risk of prostate cancer. BJU Int 2007;99(5):1041-1046.
5. Iczkowski KA, Chen HM, Yang XJ, Beach RA. Prostate cancer diagnosed after initial biopsy with atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy is similar to cancer found on initial biopsy. Urology 2002;60(5):851-854.
6. Iczkowski KA, Bassler TJ, Schwob VS, et al. Diagnosis of "suspicious for malignancy" in prostate biopsies: predictive value for cancer. Urology 1998;51(5):749-757.
7. Tan N, Lane BR, Li J, et al. Prostate cancer diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade. J Urol 2008;180(4):1325-1329.
8. Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carmichael M, Brendler CB. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA 1994;271(5):368-374.
9. Chan TY, Chan DY, Stutzman KL, Epstein JI. Does increased needle biopsy sampling of the prostate detect a higher number of potentially insignificant tumors? J Urol 2001;166(6):2181-2184.
10. Rose SC, Hassanein TI, Easter DW, et al. Value of three-dimensional US for optimizing guidance for ablating focal liver tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12(4):507-515.
11. Chin JL, Downey DB, Elliot TL, et al. Three dimensional transrectal ultrasound imaging of the prostate: initial experience with an emerging technology. Can J Urol 1999;6(2):720-726.
12. Andriole GL, Bullock TL, Belani JS, et al. Is there a better way to biopsy the prostate? prospects for a novel transrectal systematic biopsy approach. Urology 2007;70(6 suppl):22-26.
13. Cool D, Sherebrin S, Izawa J, Chin J, Fenster A. Design and evaluation of a 3D transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy system. Med Phys 2008;35(10):4695-4707.
14. Singh AK, Kruecker J, Xu S, et al. Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2008;101(7):841-845.
15. Bax J, Cool D, Gardi L, et al. Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system. Med Phys 2008;35(12):5397-5410.
16. Long JA, Daanen V, Moreau-Gaudry A, Troccaz J, Rambeaud JJ, Descotes JL. Prostate biopsies guided by three-dimensional real-time (4-D) transrectal ultrasonography on a phantom: comparative study versus two-dimensional transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies. Eur Urol 2007;52(4):1097-1104.
17. Shen F, Shinohara K, Kumar D, et al. Three-dimensional sonography with needle tracking: role in diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27(6):895-905.
18. Tong S, Downey DB, Cardinal HN, Fenster A. A three-dimensional ultrasound prostate imaging system. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996;22(6):735-746.
19. McDougall EM. Validation of surgical simulators. J Endourol 2007;21(3):244-247.
20. Djavan B, Remzi M, Schulman CC, Marberger M, Zlotta AR. Repeat prostate biopsy: who, how and when? a review. Eur Urol 2002;42(2):93-103.
21. Matlaga BR, Eskew LA, McCullough DL. Prostate biopsy: indications and technique. J Urol 2003;169(1):12-19.
22. Coakley FV, Hricak H. Radiologic anatomy of the prostate gland: a clinical approach. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38(1):15-30.