Prostate Biopsies Guided by Three-Dimensional Real-Time (4-D) Transrectal Ultrasonography on a Phantom: Comparative Study versus Two-Dimensional Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies

European Urology

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1097-1105

  Long, Jean Alexandre ^a,b   Daanen, Vincent ^b   Moreau Gaudry, Alexandre ^a   Troccaz, Jocelyne ^b   Rambeaud, Jean Jacques ^a   Descotes, Jean Luc ^a  

^a GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE TIMC IMAG   (France)

Author keywords

3 D ultrasonography; Biopsy guidance; Prostate cancer; Prostate phantom; TRUS

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; CANCER LOCALIZATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; IMAGE QUALITY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

HUMANS; MALE; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSTATE; RECTUM; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 34548321505     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.034     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Hodge K.K., McNeal J.E., Terris M.K., et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142 (1989) 71-74
2. Aus G., Abbou C.C., Bolla M., et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 48 (2005) 546-551
3. Ravery V., Billebaud T., Toublanc M., et al. Diagnostic value of 10 systematic TRUS-guided prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 35 (1999) 98-103
4. Sauer G., Deissler H., Strunz K., et al. Ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsies of breast lesions: analysis of 962 cases to determine the number of samples for reliable tumour classification. Br J Cancer 92 (2005) 231-235
5. Won H.J., Han J.K., Do K.H., et al. Value of four-dimensional ultrasonography in ultrasonographically guided biopsy of hepatic masses. J Ultrasound Med 22 (2003) 215-220
6. Polakow J., Serwatka W., Dobrzycki S., et al. A new diagnostic approach to pancreatic pseudocyst fine-needle puncture: three-dimensional sonography. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 11 (2004) 159-163
7. Epstein J.I., Chan D.W., Sokoll L.J., et al. Nonpalpable stage T1c prostate cancer: prediction of insignificant disease using free/total prostate specific antigen levels and needle biopsy findings. J Urol 160 (1998) 2407-2411
8. Djavan B., Fong Y.K., Ravery V., et al. Are repeat biopsies required in men with PSA levels ≤4 ng/ml? A multiinstitutional prospective European study. Eur Urol 47 (2005) 38-44
9. Kawakami S., Okuno T., Yonese J., et al. Optimal sampling sites for repeat prostate biopsy: a recursive partitioning analysis of three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy. Eur Urol 51 (2007) 675-683
10. Chen M.E., Troncoso P., Johnston D.A., et al. Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis. J Urol 158 (1997) 2168-2175
11. Chun F.K.-H., Graefen M., Briganti A., et al. Initial biopsy outcome prediction-head-to-head comparison of a logistic regression-based nomogram versus artificial neural network. Eur Urol 51 (2007) 1236-1243
12. Bucki M, Dauliac B, Daanen V, et al. PRONAV: a navigation software for prostate biopsies. Proceedings of Surgetica. Chambery, France, January 2005.