The effects of associative exercises on the idea generation during brainstorming;Beyin firtinasi sürecinde çaǧrişim aliştirmalarinin düşünce üretimine etkisi

Turk Psikoloji Dergisi

Volumn 24, Issue 64, 2009, Pages 34-46

  Coşkun, Hamit ^a  

^a ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Associative memory approach; Brainstorming; Close and distant; Cognitive stimulation; Concrete words

Indexed keywords

EID: 75749110582     PISSN: 13004433     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2. Brown, V. Tumeo, M., Larey, T. S. ve Paulus, P. B. (1998). Modelling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29, 495-526.
3. Camacho, L. M. ve Paulus, P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071-1080.
4. Collins, A. M. ve Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic proccesing. Psychological Review, 82, 40-428.
5. Connolly, T., Routhieaux, R. L., ve Schneider, S. K. (1993). On the effectiveness of group brainstorming: Tests of one underlying mechanism. Small Group Research, 24, 490-503.
6. Coskun, H. (2000). The effect of out-group comparison, social context, intrinsic motivation, and collective identity in brainstorming groups. Yayinlanmamiš doktora tezi, The University of Texas Texas at Arlington.
7. Coşkun, H. (2005a). Cognitive stimulation with convergent and divergent thinking exercising in brainwriting: Incubation, sequence priming, and group context. Small Group Research, 36, 466-498.
8. Coşkun, H. (2005b) Beyin yazihnunda iraksak düşü nme ve grup ortamimn düşünce üretimine etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 20, 25-38.
9. Coşkun, H. (2005c). Iraksak düs̈unme ve kategori yapisimn bireysel beyin firtinasinda düşünce üretimine etkisi. AİBU Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10 (1), 67-85.
10. Coşkun, R, Paulus, P. B., Brown, V. ve Sherwood, J. J. (2000). Cognitive stimulation and problem presentation in idea generation groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 307-329.
11. Diehl, M. ve Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 4-509.
12. Diehl, M. ve Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.
13. Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J. ve Yang, H. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 722-735.
14. Karau, S. J. ve Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A metaanalytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
15. Kerr, N. L. ve Brunn, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses. Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78-94.
16. Larey, T. S. ve Paulus, P. B. (1999). Group preference and convergent tendencies in groups: A content analysis of group brainstorming performance. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 175-184.
17. Mullen, B., Johnson, C. ve Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3-24.
18. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. D. Besner ve G. W. Humphreys, (Ed.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition içinde (264-350). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W. ve Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2003). Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 531-548.
20. Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.
21. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
22. Paivio, A. (1999). Dual Coding Theory. Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45 (3), 255-287.
23. Paivio, A., Walsh, M ve Bons, T. (1994). Concretness effects on memory: When and why? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20 (5), 1196-1204.
24. Parnes, S. J. (1992). Source book for creative-problem solving. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation Press.
25. Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 237-262.
26. Paulus, P. B. ve Brown, V. (2003). Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. P. B. Paulus ve B. A. Nijstad, (Ed.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration içinde (110-136). NY: Oxford University Press.
27. Paulus, P. B. ve Dzindolet, M. T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575-586.
28. Paulus, P. B., Dugosh, K. L., Dzindolet, M. T, Coskun, H. ve Putman, V. L. (2000). Social and cognitive influences in group brainstorming: Predicting production gains and losses. W. Stroebe ve M. Hewstone, (Ed.), European review of social psychology içinde (299-325). West Sussex: Eng. John Wiley ve Sons Ltd.
29. Paulus, P. B. ve Yang, H. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 82, 76-87.
30. Smith, S. M. (2003). The constraining effects of initial ideas. P. B. Paulus ve B. A. Nijstad, (Ed.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration içinde (15-31). NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.
31. Smith, S. M. ve Blankenship, S. E. (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. American Journal of Psychology, 104, 61-87.
32. Stroebe, W. ve Diehl, M (1995). Why groups are less effective than their members: On the productivity loss in idea generating groups. W. Stroebe ve M. Hewstone, (Ed.), European review of social psychology, 5, 271-304.
33. Sutton, R. I. ve Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming in contexts: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685-718.
34. Tekcan, A. ve Göz, İ. (2005). Třçe kelime normlari. İstanbul: Boǧaziçi Üniversitesi Yayinlari.