Three-dimensional optokinetic eye movements in the C57BL/6J mouse

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 623-630

  van Alphen, Bart ^a   Winkelman, Beerend H J ^a   Frens, Maarten A ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OPTOKINETIC EYE MOVEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; EYE FIXATION; HEAD MOVEMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; OPTOKINETIC NYSTAGMUS; ORIENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANIMALS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HEAD MOVEMENTS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MOTION PERCEPTION; NYSTAGMUS, OPTOKINETIC; ORIENTATION;

EID: 75749103044     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4072     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. de Zeeuw CI, van Alphen AM, Koekkoek SK, et al. Recording eye movements in mice: a new approach to investigate the molecular basis of cerebellar control of motor learning and motor timing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;119:193-203.
2. Picciotto MR, Wickman K. Using knockout and transgenic mice to study neurophysiology and behavior. Physiol Rev. 1998;78:1131-1163.
3. Stahl JS. Using eye movements to assess brain function in mice. Vision Res. 2004;44:3401-3410.
4. Faulstich M, van Alphen AM, Luo C, du Lac S, De Zeeuw CI. Oculomotor plasticity during vestibular compensation does not depend on cerebellar LTD. J Neurophysiol. 2006;96:1187-1195.
5. Katoh A, Yoshida T, Himeshima Y, Mishina M, Hirano T. Defective control and adaptation of reflex eye movements in mutant mice deficient in either the glutamate receptor delta2 subunit or Purkinje cells. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21:1315-1326.
6. Kimpo RR, Boyden ES, Katoh A, Ke MC, Raymond JL. Distinct patterns of stimulus generalization of increases and decreases in VOR gain. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:3092-3100.
7. van Alphen AM, Stahl JS, De Zeeuw CI. The dynamic characteristics of the mouse horizontal vestibulo-ocular and optokinetic response. Brain Res. 2001;890:296-305.
8. Baarsma E, Collewijn H. Vestibulo-ocular and optokinetic reactions to rotation and their interaction in the rabbit. J Physiol. 1974;238:603-625.
9. Simpson JI, Van der Steen J, Tan J, Graf W, Leonard CS. Representations of ocular rotations in the cerebellar flocculus of the rabbit. Prog Brain Res. 80:213-223, 1989; discussion 211-212.
10. Van der Steen J, Simpton JI, Tan J. Representation of three-dimensional eye movements in the cerebellar flocculus of the rabbit. In: Schmid R, Zambarbieri D, eds. Oculomotor Control and Cognitive Processes. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1991:63-77.
11. Simpson JI, Graf W. The selection of reference frames by nature and its investigators. In: Berthoz A, Melville-Jones G, eds. Adaptive Mechanisms in Gaze Control: Facts and Theories. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1985:3-16.
12. Simpson JI, Leonard CS, Soodak RE. The accessory optic system: analyzer of self-motion. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;545:170-179.
13. Soodak RE, Simpson JI. The accessory optic system of rabbit. I. Basic visual response properties. J Neurophysiol. 1988;60:2037-2054.
14. Groenewegen HJ, Voogd J. Olivocerebellar climbing fiber projections in the cat. An autoradiographic and degeneration study [proceedings]. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand. 1976;14:247-249.
15. De Zeeuw CI, Gerrits NM, Voogd J, Leonard CS, Simpson JI. The rostral dorsal cap and ventrolateral outgrowth of the rabbit inferior olive receive a GABAergic input from dorsal group Y and the ventral dentate nucleus. J Comp Neurol. 1994;341:420-432.
16. Ruigrok TJ, Osse RJ, Voogd J. Organization of inferior olivary projections to the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus of the rat cerebellum. J Comp Neurol. 1992;316:129-150.
17. Lisberger SG, Fuchs AF. Role of primate flocculus during rapid behavioral modification of vestibuloocular reflex. II. Mossy fiber firing patterns during horizontal head rotation and eye movement. J Neurophysiol. 1978;41:764-777.
18. Leonard CS, Simpson JI, Graf W. Spatial organization of visual messages of the rabbit's cerebellar flocculus. I. Typology of inferior olive neurons of the dorsal cap of Kooy. J Neurophysiol. 1988;60:2073-2090.
19. Tan J, Epema AH, Voogd J. Zonal organization of the flocculovestibular nucleus projection in the rabbit: a combined axonal tracing and acetylcholinesterase histochemical study. J Comp Neurol. 1995;356:51-71.
20. Van der Steen J, Simpson JI, Tan J. Functional and anatomic organization of three-dimensional eye movements in rabbit cerebellar flocculus. J Neurophysiol. 1994;72:31-46.
21. Sugihara I, Ebata S, Shinoda Y. Functional compartmentalization in the flocculus and the ventral dentate and dorsal group y nuclei: an analysis of single olivocerebellar axonal morphology. J Comp Neurol. 2004;470:113-133.
22. Schonewille M, Luo C, Ruigrok TJ, et al. Zonal organization of the mouse flocculus: physiology, input, and output. J Comp Neurol. 2006;497:670-682.
23. Crawford JD, Martinez-Trujillo JC, Klier EM. Neural control of three-dimensional eye and head movements. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13:655-662.
24. Collewijn H. The optokinetic system of the rabbit. Doc Ophthalmol. 1971;30:205-226.
25. Sandor PS, Frens MA, Henn V. Chameleon eye position obeys Listing's law. Vision Res. 2001;41:2245-2251.
26. Migliaccio AA, Macdougall HG, Minor LB, Della Santina CC. Inexpensive system for real-time 3-dimensional video-oculography using a fluorescent marker array. J Neurosci Methods. 2005;143:141-150.
27. Stahl JS, van Alphen AM, De Zeeuw CI. A comparison of video and magnetic search coil recordings of mouse eye movements. J Neurosci Methods. 2000;99:101-110.
28. Collewijn H. Optokinetic eye movements in the rabbit: inputoutput relations. Vision Res. 1969;9:117-132.
29. Robinson DA. A method of measuring eye movement using a scleral search coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1963;10:137-145.
30. van Alphen B, Winkelman BH, Frens MA. Age-and sex-related differences in contrast sensitivity in C57BL/6 mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2451-2458.
31. Mardia KV, Jupp PE. Directional Statistics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1999:257.
32. Remtulla S, Hallett PE. A schematic eye for the mouse, and comparisons with the rat. Vision Res. 1985;25:21-31.
33. Schmucker C, Schaeffel F. A paraxial schematic eye model for the growing C57BL/6 mouse. Vision Res. 2004;44:1857-1867.
34. Shupe JM, Kristan DM, Austad SN, Stenkamp DL. The eye of the laboratory mouse remains anatomically adapted for natural conditions. Brain Behav Evol. 2006;67:39-52.
35. Iwashita M, Kanai R, Funabiki K, Matsuda K, Hirano T. Dynamic properties, interactions and adaptive modifications of vestibuloocular reflex and optokinetic response in mice. Neurosci Res. 2001;39:299-311.
36. Katoh A, Kitazawa H, Itohara S, Nagao S. Dynamic characteristics and adaptability of mouse vestibulo-ocular and optokinetic response eye movements and the role of the flocculo-olivary system revealed by chemical lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:7705-7710.
37. Nagao S. Effects of vestibulocerebellar lesions upon dynamic characteristics and adaptation of vestibulo-ocular and optokinetic responses in pigmented rabbits. Exp Brain Res. 1983;53:36-46.
38. Godaux E, Gobert C, Halleux J. Vestibuloocular reflex, optokinetic response, and their interactions in the alert cat. Exp Neurol. 1983;80:42-54.
39. Stahl JS, James RA, Oommen BS, Hoebeek FE, De Zeeuw CI. Eye movements of the murine P/Q calcium channel mutant tottering, and the impact of aging. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95:1588-1607.
40. Andreescu CE, De Ruiter MM, De Zeeuw CI, De Jeu MT. Otolith deprivation induces optokinetic compensation. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:3487-3496.
41. Andreescu CE, Milojkovic BA, Haasdijk ED, et al. Estradiol improves cerebellar memory formation by activating estrogen receptor beta. J Neurosci. 2007;27:10832-10839.
42. Tan HS, van der Steen J, Simpson JI, Collewijn H. Three-dimensional organization of optokinetic responses in the rabbit. J Neurophysiol. 1993;69:303-317.
43. Kingma H, Stegeman P, Vogels R. Ocular torsion induced by static and dynamic visual stimulation and static whole body roll. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;254(suppl 1):S61-S63.
44. Smeets JB, Hooge IT. Nature of variability in saccades. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90:12-20.
45. van der Geest JN, Frens MA. Recording eye movements with video-oculography and scleral search coils: a direct comparison of two methods. J Neurosci Methods. 2002;114:185-195.
46. Schaller UC, van der Velden EM, Drost BH, Weede S, Klauss V. Keratography (corneal tattooing) in corneal leukoma (in German). Ophthalmologe. 2001;98:147-150.
47. Haslwanter T. Mathematics of three-dimensional eye rotations. Vision Res. 1995;35:1727-1739.
48. Rodrigues B. Mémoire sur l'attraction des sphéröi{dotless}des. Correspondance sur L'Nospace Écoleimpériale Polytechnique. 1816;3:361-385.
49. van Opstal A. Representation of eye position in three dimensions. In: Berthoz A, ed. Multisensory Control of Movement. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1993:27-41.