When correlations go bad

Psychologist

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 122-123

  Baguley, Thom ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 75749103030     PISSN: 09528229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Baguley, T. (2009). Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported? British Journal of Psychology. 100, 603-617.
2. Brillinger, D.R. (2001). John Tukey and the correlation coefficient, Computing Science and Statistics, 33, 204-218.
3. Fisher, R.A. (1925). Statistical methods for research workers. London: Oliver & Boyd.
4. Hunter, J.E. & Schmidt, F.L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Gelman, A. (2008). Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2865-2873.
6. Gelman, A. & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D., MacCallum, R.C. & Nicewander, W.A. (2005). Use of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods, 10, 178-192.
8. Ree, M.J. & Carretta, T.R. (2006). The role of measurement error in familiar statistics. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 99-112.
9. Rodgers, J.L. & Nicewander, W.L. (1988). Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician, 42, 59-66.
10. Schmidt, F.L. & Hunter, J.E. (1999). Theory testing and measurement error. Intelligence, 27, 183-198.
11. Tukey, J.W. (1954). Causation, regression and path analysis. In O. Kempthorne, T.A. Bancroft, J.W. Gowen & J.L. Lush (Eds.) Statistics and mathematics in biology (pp.35-66). Ames, IA: Iowa State College Press.
12. Wilkinson, L. & APA Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.