Electrically-evoked neural activities of rd1 mice retinal ganglion cells by repetitive pulse stimulation

Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 443-448

  Ryu, Sang Baek ^a   Ye, Jang Hee ^b   Lee, Jong Seung ^a   Goo, Yong Sook ^b   Kim, Chi Hyun ^a   Kim, Kyung Hwan ^a  

^a Yonsei University Wonju   (South Korea)

^b Chungbuk National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Degenerated retina; Electrical stimulation; Microelectrode arrray (MEA); Retinal ganglion cells; Retinal implant; Visual neural prosthesis

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FREQUENCY MODULATION; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PHOTORECEPTOR; RETINA DEGENERATION; RETINA GANGLION CELL; SPIKE WAVE; VISUAL PROSTHESIS;

EID: 75749100221     PISSN: 12264512     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4196/kjpp.2009.13.6.443     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ahuja AK, Behrend MR, Kuroda M, Humayun MS, Weiland JD. An in-vitro model of a retinal implant. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55: 1744-1753, 2008.
2. Fried SI, Hsueh HA, Werblin FS. A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. J Neurophysiol 95: 970-978, 2006.
3. Hesse L, Schanze T, Wilms M, Eger M. Implantation of retina stimulation electrodes and recording of electrical stimulation responses in the visual cortex of the cat. Graef Arch Clin Exp Ophthal 238: 840-845, 2000.
4. Hornig R, Laube T, Walter P, Velikay-Parel M, Bornfeld N, Feucht M, Akguel H, Rössler G, Alteheld N, Notarp DL, Wyatt J, Richard G. A method and technical equipment for an acute human trial to evaluate retinal implant technology. J Neural Eng 2: S129-S124, 2005.
5. Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, Weiland JD, Dangnelie G, Katona S, Greenberg R, Suzuki S. Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina. Vision Res 39: 2569-2576, 1999.
6. Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Fujii GY, Greenberg R, Williamson R, Little J, Mech B, Cimmarusti V, Boemel GV, Dagnelie G, de Juan E Jr. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res 43: 2573-2581, 2003.
7. Jensen RJ, Rizzo JF III. Responses of ganglion cells to repetitive electrical stimulation of the retina. J Neural Eng 4: S1-S6, 2007.
8. Jensen RJ, Ziv OR, Rizzo JF. Responses of rabbit retinal ganglion cells to electrical stimulation with an epiretinal electrode. J Neural Eng 2: S16-S21, 2005.
9. Kazemi M, Basham E, Sivaprakasam M, Wang G, Rodger D, Weiland J, Tai YC, Liu W, Humayun M. A test microchip for evaluation of hermetic packaging technology for biomedical prosthetic implants. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 6: 4093-4095, 2004.
10. Margolis DJ, Newkirk G, Euler T, Detwiler PB. Functional stability of retinal ganglion cells after degeneration-induced changes in synaptic input. J Neurosci 28: 6526-6536, 2008.
11. Merabet LB, Rizzo JF, Amedi A, Somers DC, Pascual-Leone A. What blindness can tell us about seeing again: merging neuroplasticity and neuroprosthesis. Nat Rev Neurosci 6: 71-77, 2005.
12. Rizzo JF III, Wyatt J, Loewenstein J, Kelly S, Shire D. Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 44: 5362-5369, 2003.
13. Ryu SB, Lee JS, Ye JH, Goo YS, Kim CH, Kim KH. Analysis of neuronal activities of retinal ganglion cells of degenerated retinal evoked by electrical pulse stimulation. J Biomed Eng Res 30: 347-354, 2009a.
14. Ryu SB, Ye JH, Lee JS, Goo YS, Kim KH. Characterization of retinal ganglion cell activities evoked by temporally patterned electrical stimulation for the development of stimulus encoding strategies for retinal implants. Brain Res 1275: 33-42, 2009b.
15. Sekirnjak C, Hottowy P, Sher A, Dabrowski W, Litke AM, Chichilnisky EJ. Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. J Neurophysiol 95: 3311-3327, 2006.
16. Seo JM, Kim SJ, Chung H, Kim ET, Yu HG, Yu YS. Biocompatibility of polyimide microelectrode array for retinal stimulation. Mater Sci Eng C 24: 185-189, 2004.
17. Sivaprakasam M, Wentai L, Guoxing W, Weiland JD, Humayun MS. Architecture tradeoffs in high-density microstimulators for retinal prosthesis. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I-Regul Pap 52: 2629-2641, 2005.
18. Stasheff SF. Emergence of sustained spontaneous hyperactivity and temporary preservation of OFF responses in ganglion cells of the retinal degeneration (rd1) mouse. J Neurophysiol 99: 1408-1421, 2008.
19. Stett A, Barth W, Weiss S, Haemmerle H, Zrenner E. Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina. Vis Res 40: 1785-1795, 2000.
20. Veraart C, Raftopoulos C, Mortmer JT, Delbeke J, Pins D, Michaus G, Vanlierde A, Parrini S, Wanet-Defelqu M. Visual sensations produced by optic nerve stimulation using an implanted self-sizing spiral cuff electrode. Brain Res 813: 181-186, 1998.
21. Ye JH, Goo YS. The slow wave component of retinal activity in rd/rd mouse recorded with a multi-electrode array. Physiol Meas 28: 1079-1088, 2007.
22. Zrenner E. Will retinal implants restore vision? Science 295: 1022-1025, 2002.