Effect of mannitol treatment on ultrasound emission during texture profile analysis of potato and apple tissue

Journal of Texture Studies

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 339-359

  Zdunek, Artur ^a   Bednarczyk, Justyna ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF AGROPHYSICS   (Poland)

Author keywords

Acoustic emission; Apple; Potato; Texture; Texture profile analysis

Indexed keywords

MALUS X DOMESTICA; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 33745328344     PISSN: 00224901     EISSN: 17454603     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4603.2006.00055.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ABBOTT, J.A., BACHMAN, G.S., CHILDERS, R.F., FITZGERALD, J.V. and MATUSIK, F.J. 1968. Sonic techniques for measuring texture of fruits and vegetables. Food Technol. 22, 635-646.
2. ALVAREZ, M.D., SAUNDERS, D.E.J. and VINCENT, J.F.V. 2000. Effect of turgor pressure on the cutting energy of stored potato tissue. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 210, 1331-1339.
3. ALVAREZ, M.D., CANET, W. and LOPEZ, M.E. 2002. Influence of deformation rate and degree of compression on textural parameters of potato and apple tissues in texture profile analysis. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 215, 13-20.
4. BOURNE, M.C. 2002. Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurement, 2nd Ed., Academic Press, London, U.K.
5. CHEN, P., RUIZ-ALTISENT, M. and BARREIRO, P. 1996. Effect of impacting mass on firmness sensing of fruits. Trans. ASAE 39(3), 1019-1023.
6. CHEN, J., KARLSSON, C. and POVEY, M. 2005. Acoustic envelope detector for crispness assessment of biscuits. J. Texture Studies 36, 139-156.
7. CHRISTENSEN, C.M. and VICKERS, Z.M. 1981. Relationships of chewing sounds to judgements of food crispness. J. Food Sci. 46, 574-578.
8. DACREMONT, C. 1995. Spectral composition of eating sounds generated by crispy, crunchy and crackly foods. J. Texture Studies 26, 27-43.
9. DAUMAS, B., XU, W.L. and BRONLUND, J. 2005. Jaw mechanism modelling and simulation. Mech. Mach. Theory 40, 821-833.
10. DE BELIE, N., SCHOTTE, S., COUCKE, P. and DE BAERDEMAEKER, J. 2000. Development of an automated monitoring device to quantify changes in firmness of apples during storage. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 18, 1-8.
11. DIJKSTERHUIS, G., LUVTEN, H., DE WIJK, R. and MOJET, J. 2005. A new vocabulary for crisp and crunchy dry model foods. Food Qual. Prefer, (in press, available online at http://www.sciencedirect.com).
12. DRAKE, B.K. 1963. Food crushing sounds: An introductory study. J. Food Sci. 28, 233-241.
13. DUIZER, L. 2001. A review of acoustic research for studying the sensory perception of crisp, crunchy and crackly. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 12, 17-24.
14. DUPRAT, F., GROTTE, M., PIETRI, E. and LOONIS, D. 1997. The acoustic impulse response method for measuring the overall firmness of fruit. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 66, 251-259.
15. HAMAN, J. and KONSTANKIEWICZ, K. 2000. Destruction processes in the cellular medium of a plant: Theoretical approach. Int. Agrophys. 14(1), 37-42.
16. LIU, X. and TAN, J. 1999. Acoustic wave analysis for food crispness evaluation. J. Texture Studies 30, 397-408.
17. LUYTEN, H., PLIJTER, J.J. and VAN VLIET, T. 2004. Crispy/crunchy crusts of cellular solid foods: A literature review with discussion. J. Texture Studies 35, 445-492.
18. MALECKI, I. and RANACHOWSKI, J. 1994. Acoustic Emission, Sources, Methods, Applications. Biuro Pascal, Warsaw, Poland (in Polish).
19. MARZEC, A., LEWICKI, P.P., RANACHOWSKI, Z. and DEBOWSKI, T. 2003. Cereal food texture evaluation with application of mechanical and acoustical methods. In Proceedings of the AMAS Workshop on Nondestructive Testing of Materials NTM'03 (J. Deputat and Z. Ranachowski eds.) pp. 111-131. Centre of Excellence for Advanced Materials and Structures, Warsaw, Poland, May 19-21.
20. MOHSENIN, N.N. 1986. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials, 2nd Ed., Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, New York, NY.
21. NIKLAS, K.J. 1992. Plant Biomechanics, An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
22. PITT, R.E. and CHEN, H.L. 1983. Time-dependent aspects of the strength and rheology of vegetative tissue. Trans. ASAE 26(6), 1275-1280.
23. SCHOTTE, S., DE BELIE, N. and DE BAERDEMAEKER, J. 1999. Acoustic impulse-response technique for evaluation and modelling of firmness of tomato fruit. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 17, 105-115.
24. SHMULEVICH, I., GALILI, N. and BENICHOU, N. 1998. Sensing and analyzing the acoustic response of avocado and mango using a flexible piezoelectric transducer. Acta Hort. (ISHS) 421, 121-128.
25. SUN, D.-W. and LI, B. 2003. Microstructural change of potato tissues frozen by ultrasound-assisted immersion freezing. J. Food Eng. 57(4), 337-345.
26. SZCZESNIAK-SURMACKA, A. 2002. Texture is a sensory property. Food Qual. Prefer. 13, 215-225.
27. VICKERS, Z.M. and BOURNE, M.C. 1976. A psychoacoustical theory of crispness. J. Food Sci. 41, 1158-1164.
28. ZDUNEK, A. and KONSTANKIEWICZ, K. 2004. Acoustic emission in investigation of plant tissue micro-cracking. Trans. ASAE 47(4), 1171-1177.
29. ZDUNEK, A. and UMEDA, M. 2005. Influence of cell size and cell wall volume fraction on failure properties of potato and carrot tissue. J. Texture Studies 36, 25-43.
30. ZUDE, M., HEROLD, B., ROGER, J.-M., BELLON-MAUREL, V. and LANDAHL, S. 2005. Non-destructive tests on the prediction of apple fruit flesh firmness and soluble solids content on tree and in shelf life. J. Food Eng. (in press, available at http://www.sciencedirect.com).