The development of a new method for the evaluation of reading acuity - The Salzburg Reading Desk (SRD);Die Entwicklung einer neuen Methode zur Bestimmung der Leseschärfe - Das Salzburg Reading Desk (SRD)

Spektrum der Augenheilkunde

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 435-438

  Dexl, A ^a   Schlogel H ^a   Wolfbauer, M ^a   Grabner, G ^a  

^a PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Presbyopia correction; Reading acuity; Reading distance; Salzburg Reading Desk

Indexed keywords

EID: 75649138743     PISSN: 09304282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00717-009-0370-5     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Radner W, Obermayer W, Richter-Müksch S, Willinger U, Velikay-Parel M, Eisenwort B (2002) The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240 (6): 461-467.
2. Uusitalo RJ, Brans T, Pessi, Tarkkanen A (1999) Evaluating cataract surgery gains by assessing patients' quality of life using the VF-7. J Cataract Refract Surg 25 (7): 989-994.
3. Mönestam E, Wachtmeister L (1997) The impact of cataract surgery on low vision patients. A population based study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75 (5): 569-576.
4. Anschütz T (1994) Laser correction of hyperopia and presbyopia. Int Ophthalmol Clin 34 (4): 107-137.
5. Bauerberg JM (1999) Centered vs. inferior off-center ablation to correct hyperopia and presbyopia. J Refract Surg 15 (1): 66-69.
6. Fernandez-Suntay JP, Pineda R 2nd, Azar DT (2004) Conductive keratoplasty. Int Ophthalmol Clin 44 (1): 161-168.
7. McDonald MB, Hersh PS, Manche EE, et al (2002) Conductive keratoplasty for the correction of low to moderate hyperopia: U. S. clinical trial 1-year results on 355 eyes. Ophthalmology 109 (11): 1978-1989.
8. Schachar RA (1992) Cause and treatment of presbyopia with a method for increasing the amplitude of accommodation. Ann Ophthalmol 24 (12): 445-452.
9. Qazi MA, Pepose JS, Shuster JJ (2002) Implantation of scleral expansion band segments for the treatment of presbyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 134 (6): 808-815.
10. Fukasaku H, Marron JA (2001) Anterior ciliary sclerotomy with silicone expansion plug implantation: effect on presbyopia and intraocular pressure. Int Ophthalmol Clin 41 (2): 133-141.
11. Baïkoff G, Matach G, Fontaine A, et al (2004) Correction of presbyopia with refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (7): 1454-1460.
12. Holladay JT, van Dijk H, Lang A, et al (1990) Optical performance of multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 16 (4): 413-422.
13. Gimbel HV, Sanders DR, Raanan MG (1991) Visual and refractive results of multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 98 (6): 881-888.
14. Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Huber S, Nguyen NX, Küchle M (2003) Theoretical and measured pseudophakic accommodation after the implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol 121 (12): 1722-1727.
15. Cumming JS, Slade SG, Chayet A, AT-45 Study Group (2001) Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens: results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Ophthalmology 108 (11): 2005-2009.
16. Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Menapace R, et al (2004) Laser-interferometric assessment of pilocarpine-induced movement of an accommodating intraocular lens: a randomized trial. Ophthalmology 111 (8): 1515-1521.
17. Küchle M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Gusek-Schneider GC, Martus P, Nguyen NX; The Erlangen Accomodative Intraocular Lens Study Group (2004) Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 111 (2): 318-324.
18. Bach M, Kommerell G (1998) Sehschärfebestimmung nach Europäischer Norm: wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und Möglichkeiten der automatischen Messung. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 212 (4): 190-195.
19. Augenoptik - Sehschärfeprüfung - Das Normsehzeichen und seine Darbietung. EN ISO 8596: 1994; Beuth-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.
20. Colenbrander A (1988) Visual acuity measurement standard. Ital J Ophthalmol II/I: 5-19.
21. Sehschärfebestimmung. Teil 3, 5 und 6. DIN 58220; Beuth Verlag, Berlin, 1997.
22. Bailey IL, Lovie JE (1980) The design and use of a new near-vision chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 57 (6): 378-387.
23. Radner W, Willinger U, Obermayer W, Mudrich C, Velikay-Parel M, Eisenwort B (1998) Eine neue Lesetafel zur gleichzeitigen Bestimmung von Lesevisus und Lesegeschwindigkeit. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 213 (3): 174-181.
24. Committee on Vision (1980) Recommended standard procedures for the clinical measurement and specification of visual acuity. Adv Ophthalmol 41: 103-148.
25. Ferris F, Kassoff A, Bresnick G, Bailey I (1982) New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 94 (1): 91-96.
26. Stifter E, König F, Lang T, et al (2004) Reliability of a standardized reading chart system: variance component analysis, test-retest and inter-chart reliability. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242 (1): 31-39.
27. Richter-Müksch S, Weghaupt H, Skorpik C, Velikay-Parel M, Radner W (2002) Reading performance with a refractive multifocal and a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 28 (11): 1957-1963.
28. Licht und Beleuchtung - Beleuchtung von Arbeitsstätten - Teil 1: Arbeitsstätten in Innenräumen DIN EN 12464-1: 2003 03; Beuth-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.
29. Holladay JT (ed) (2007) Chapter 10-Understanding neural adaptation, Quality of vision-Essential optics for the refractive surgeon. Slack Inc., 2007, pp 115-122.