Selective terminations and respect for the disabled

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 32-45

  Stangl, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Disability; Respect; Selective abortion; Selective infanticide; Singer

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; ARTICLE; BENEFICENCE; CONGENITAL DISORDER; DISABLED PERSON; ETHICS; FEMALE; FETUS; HUMAN; MORALITY; PERSONHOOD; PHILOSOPHY; PREGNANCY;

ABORTION, EUGENIC; BENEFICENCE; CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES; DISABLED PERSONS; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FETUS; HUMANS; MORALS; PERSONHOOD; PHILOSOPHY, MEDICAL; PREGNANCY;

EID: 75649125552     PISSN: 03605310     EISSN: 17445019     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhp058     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Adams, R. M. 2006. A Theory of Virtue. Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.
2. Asch, A. 1989. Reproductive technology and disability. In Reproductive laws for the 1990 ' s (pp. 69-124 ). eds S. Cohen and N. Taub. Clifton, NJ : Humana Press.
3. 1999. Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: A challenge to practice and policy. American Journal of Public Health 89 : 1649-1657
4. 2000. Why I still haven't changed my mind about prenatal diagnosis: Refl ections and refi nements. In Prenatal testing and disability rights (pp. 234-258 ). eds E. Parens and A. Asch. Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press.
5. Bailey, M. A. 2000. Why I had amniocentesis. In Prenatal testing and disability rights (pp. 64-71 ). eds E. Parens and A. Asch. Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press.
6. Buchanan, A., D. Brock, N. Daniels, and D. Wikler. 2000. From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
7. Gallup, G., Jr. 1997. The Gallup poll: Public opinion 1996. Wilmington, DE : Scholarly Resources, Inc.
8. Glover, J. 2006. Choosing children: Genes, disability, and design. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
9. Hull, R. 2006. Cheap listening? - Refl ections on the concept of wrongful disability. Bioethics. 20 : 55-63.
10. McBryde Johnson, H. (2003, Feb. 16). Unspeakable conversations. New York Times Magazine. Sunday, Late Edition.
11. Parens, E. and A. Asch, (eds ). 2000. Prenatal testing and disability rights. Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press.
12. Press, N. 2000. Assessing the expressive character of prenatal testing: The choices made or the choices made available? ' In Prenatal testing and disability rights (pp. 214-233 ). eds E. Parens and A. Asch. Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press.
13. Saad, L. 2002. Public opinion about abortion: An in-depth review. Gallup News Service: Special Report [On-line]. Available: http :// www. gallup. com / poll / 9904 / Public - Opinion - About -Abortion - InDepth - Review. aspx. (Accessed July 9, 2008).
14. Saxton, M. 2000. Why members of the disability community oppose prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion. In Prenatal testing and disability rights (pp. 147-164 ). eds E. Parens and A. Asch. Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press.
15. Singer, P. 1992. A German attack on applied ethics: A statement by Peter Singer. Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 : 85-91.
16. 1993. Practical ethics, 2nd ed. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
17. Singer, P. and H. Kuhse. 1985. Should the baby live? The problem of handicapped infants. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
18. Tooley, M. 1972. Abortion and Infanticide. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 2 : 37-65.
19. 1983. Abortion and Infanticide. Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.
20. Uniacke, S. 1997. Replaceability and infanticide. The Journal of Value Inquiry. 31 : 153-166
21. Wertz, D. 2000. Drawing lines: Notes for policymakers. In Prenatal testing and disability rights (pp. 261-287 ). eds E. Parens and A. Asch. Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press.