Essentially derived varieties in ornamentals

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 836, Issue , 2009, Pages 163-168

  Vosman, B ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

EDV; Microsatellite; Rose

Indexed keywords

EID: 75649096335     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2009.836.23     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ASSINSEL/ISF. 2005. Essential derivation information and guidance to breeders, June 2005 (http://www.amseed.com/pdfs/EDVInfoToBreeders-0605.pdf)
2. Becher, S.A., Steinmetz, K., Weising, K., Boury, S., Peltier, D., Renou, J.-P., Kahl, G. and Wolff, K. 2000. Microsatellites for cultivar identification in Pelargonium. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101:643-651.
3. Borchert, T., Krueger, J. and Hohe, A. 2008. Implementation of a model for identifying Essentially Derived Varieties in vegetatively propagated Calluna vulgaris varieties. BMC Genet. 9:56.
4. De Riek, J., Dendauw, J., Leus, L., de Loose, M. and van Bockstaele, E. 2000. Variety protection by use of molecular markers: some case studies. Plant Biosystems 135: 107-113.
5. Debener, T., Janakiram, T. and Mattiesch, L. 2000. Sports and seedlings of rose varieties analysed with molecular markers. Plant Breed. 119: 71-74.
6. Esselink, G.D., Smulders, M.J.M. and Vosman, B. 2003. Identification of cut rose (Rosa hybrida) and rootstock varieties using robust sequence tagged microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106:277-286.
7. Ibañez, J. 2001. Mathematical analysis of RAPD data to establish reliability of varietal assignment in vegetatively propagated species. Acta Hort. 546:73-79.
8. Ibañez, J. and Van Eeuwijk, F.A. 2003. Microsatellite profiles as a basis for intellectual property protection in grape. Acta Hort. 603:41-47.
9. Smulders, M.J.M., Esselink, D., Voorrips, R.E. and Vosman, B. 2005. Analysis of a database of DNA profiles of 734 hybrid tea rose (Rosa hybrida) varieties. Document for UPOV Working Group on Biochemical and Molecular Techniques and DNA-profiling in particular (BMT9/12).
10. Smulders, M.J.M., Esselink, D., Voorrips, R.E. and Vosman, B. 2009. Analysis of a database of DNA profiles of 734 hybrid tea rose (Rosa hybrida) varieties. Acta Hort. 837: 169-174.
11. UPOV. 1991. International convention for the protection of new varieties of plants of December 2, 1961, as Revised at Geneva on November 10, 1972, on October 23, 1978, and on March 19, 1991. http://www.upov.int/en/publications/ conventions/1991/act1991.htm
12. Van Eeuwijk, F.A. and Baril, C.P. 2001. Conceptual and statistical issues related to the use of molecular markers for distinctness and essential derivation. Acta Hort. 546:35-53.
13. Van Eeuwijk, F.A. and Law, J.R. 2004. Statistical aspects of essential derivation, with illustrations based on lettuce and barley. Euphytica 137: 129-137.
14. Vosman, B., Esselink, D. and Smulders, R. 2001. Microsatellite markers for identification and registration of rose varieties. Document for UPOV Working group on biochemical and molecular techniques and DNA-profiling in particular (BMT -TWO/Rose/1/1).
15. Vosman, B., Esselink, D. and van Eeuwijk, F.A. 2003. The use of microsatellites for identifying putative EDV's in rose. Document for UPOV Working Group on Biochemical and Molecular Techniques and DNA-profiling in particular (BMT8/6).
16. Vosman, B., Visser, D., Voort, J.R. van der, Smulders, M.J.M. and van Eeuwijk, F.A. 2004. The establishment of 'essential derivation' among rose varieties, using AFLP. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109:1718-1725.