Cervical segmental motion at levels adjacent to disc herniation as determined with kinetic magnetic resonance imaging

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 22, 2009, Pages 2389-2394

  Daffner, Scott D ^a   Xin, Jiang ^b   Taghavi, Cyrus E ^c   Hymanson, Henry J ^c   Mudiyam, Chethan ^c   Hongyu, Wei ^b   Wang, Jeffrey C ^c  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Sino Japan Friendship Hospital   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

adjacent segment; cervical spine; disc herniation; Kinematic analysis; kinetic magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; KINEMATICS; KINETIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NECK PAIN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; BIOMECHANICS; DISEASE COURSE; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 75549087756     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b20054     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Demaille-Wlodyka S, Chiquet C, Lavaste JF, et al. Cervical range of motion and cephalic kinematics: ultrasonographic analysis by age and sex. Spine 2007;32:E254-61.
2. Bogduk N, Mercer S. Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: normal kinematics. Clin Biomech 2000;15:633-48.
3. Wigfield C, Gill S, Nelson R, et al. Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg 2002;96:17-21.
4. Takeshima T, Omokawa S, Takaoka T, et al. Sagittal alignment of cervical flexion and extension: lateral radiographic analysis. Spine 2002;27: E348-55.
5. Dai L. Disc degeneration and cervical instability. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging with radiography. Spine 1998;23:1734-8.
6. Benneker LM, Heini PF, Anderson SE, et al. Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 2005;14:27-35.
7. Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, et al. Reliability of a magnetic resonance imaging-based grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:288-92.
8. Morishita Y, Hida S, Miyazaki M, et al. The effects of the degenerative changes in the functional spinal unit on the kinematics of the cervical spine. Spine 2008;33:E178-82.
9. Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, et al. Kinematic analysis of the relationship between the grade of disc degeneration and motion unit of the cervical spine. Spine 2008;33:187-93.
10. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2001;26:1873-8.
11. Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, et al. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75: 1298-307.
12. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, et al. Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine 1993;18:2167-73. (Pubitemid 23336048)
13. Frobin W, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, et al. Sagittal plane segmental motion of the cervical spine. A new precision measurement protocol and normal motion data of healthy adults. Clin Biomech 2002;17:21-31.
14. Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Leivseth G, et al. Precision measurement of segmental motion from flexion-extension radiographs of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech 1996;11:457-65.
15. Dvir Z, Gal-Eshel N, Shamir B, et al. Cervical Motion in patients with chronic disorders of the cervical spine: a reproducibility study. Spine 2006; 31:E394-9.
16. Reitman CA, Mauro KM, Nguyen L, et al. Intervertebral motion between flexion and extension in asymptomatic individuals. Spine 2004;29:2832-43.
17. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 2002;27:2431-4.
18. Gore DR, Sepic SB. Anterior discectomy and fusion for painful cervical disc disease. A report of 50 patients with an average follow-up of 21 years. Spine 1998;23:2047-51.
19. Lunsford LD, Bissonette DJ, Jannetta PJ, et al. Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. Part 1: Treatment of lateral cervical disc herniation in 253 cases. J Neurosurg 1980;53:1-11.
20. Ishihara H, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion. Spine J 2004;4:624-8.
21. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:519-28.
22. Fuller DA, Kirkpatrick JS, Emery SE, et al. A kinematic study of the cervical spine before and after segmental arthrodesis. Spine 1998;23:1649-56.
23. Lee HM, Nicholson LL, Adams RD. Cervical range of motion associations with subclinical neck pain. Spine 2004;29:33-40.
24. Schwab JS, DiAngelo DJ, Foley KT. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go? Spine 2006;31: 2439-48.
25. Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, et al. Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 1999;24:670-5.