Radiological and pathological size estimations of pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, specimen handling and the influence on the success of breast conservation surgery: A review of 2564 cases from the Sloane Project

British Journal of Cancer

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 285-293

  Thomas, J ^a   Evans, A ^b   MacArtney, J ^c   Pinder, S E ^d   Hanby, A ^e   Ellis, I ^f   Kearins, O ^g   Roberts, T ^g   Clements, K ^g   Lawrence, G ^g   Bishop, H ^h  

^a WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS COVENTRY AND WARWICKSHIRE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f NOTTINGHAM CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^h ROYAL BOLTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Breast screening; DCIS measurement; Pathology; Radiology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SIZE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MEDICAL AUDIT; SPECIMEN HANDLING;

EID: 75549087581     PISSN: 00070920     EISSN: 15321827     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605513     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the Analysis of Method Comparison Studies. Statistician 32: 307-317
2. Asjoe FT, Altinas S, Colpaert C, Marck EV, Vermorken JB, Tjalma WA (2007) The value of the Van Nuys prognostic index in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a retrospective analysis. Breast J 13: 359-367
3. Bagnall MJ, Evans AJ, Wilson AR, Pinder SE, Denley H, Geraghty JG, Ellis IO (2001) Predicting invasion in mammographically detected micro-calcification. Clin Radiol 56: 828-832
4. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476): 307-310
5. Chakrabarti J, Evans AJ, James J, Ellis IO, Pinder SE, Macmillan RD (2006) Accuracy of mammography in predicting histological extent of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). EJSO 32: 1089-1092
6. Dadmanesh F, Fan X, Dastane A, Amin MB, Bose S (2009) Comparative analysis of size estimation by mapping and counting number of blocks with ductal carcinoma in situ in breast excision specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133: 26-30
7. de Roos MA, van der Vegt B, de Vries J, Wesseling J, de Bock GH (2007) Pathological and biological differences between screen-detected and interval ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 14: 2097-2104
8. de Roos MAJ, Pijnappel RM, Post WJ, de Vries J, Baas PC, Groote LD (2004) Correlation between imaging and pathology in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. World J Surg Oncol 2: 4
9. Di Saverio S, Catena F, Santini D, Ansaloni L, Fogacci T, Mignani S, Leone A, Gazzotti F, Gagliardi S, De Cataldis A, Taffurelli M (2008) 259 patients with DCIS of the breast applying USC/Van Nuys prognostic index: a retrospective review with long term follow up. Breast Cancer Res Treat 109: 405-416
10. Dunne C, Burke JP, Morrow M, Kell MR (2009) Effect of margin status on local recurrence after breast conservation and radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. JCO 27: 1615-1620
11. Ellis IO, Pinder SE, Bobrow L, Buley ID, Coyne J, Going JJ, Humphreys S, Jasani B, Lakhani S, Lowe J, Miller K, Rhodes A, Walker RA, Wells CA. Pathology Reporting of Breast Disease. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, (2005), Sheffield, UK
12. Evans A, Pinder S, Wilson R, Sibbering M, Poller D, Elston C, Ellis I (1994) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic and pathological findings. Am J Roentg 162: 1307-1311 (Pubitemid 24187477)
13. Faverly DR, Burgers L, Bult P, Holland R (1994) Three dimensional imaging of mammary ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical implications. Semin Diagn Pathol 11: 193-198
14. Holland R, Hendricks JH (1994) Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation. Semin Diagn Pathol 11: 189-192
15. Holland R, Hendricks JH, Veebek AL, Mrarunac M, Schurmans Stekhoven JH (1990) Extent, distribution and mammographic-pathologic correlations of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet 335: 519-522
16. Jackson PA, Cook MG, Merchant W, McCormick CJ (1994) A comparison of large block macrodisectioning and conventional techniques in breast pathology. Virch Arch 425: 243-248
17. Kim do Y, Moon WK, Cho N, Ko ES, Yang SK, Park JS, Kim SM, Park IA, Cha JH, Lee EH (2007) MRI of the breast for the detection and assessment of the size of ductal carcinoma in situ. Korean J Radiol 8: 32-39
18. Lester SC, Bose S, Chen Y-Y, Connolly JL, de Baca ME, Fitzgibbons PL, Hayes DF, Kleer C, O'Malley FP, Page DL, Smith BL, Weaver DL, Winer E, for the Members of the Cancer Committee and College of American Pathologists (2009) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133: 15-25
19. Pijnappel RM, van den Donk M, Holland R, Mali WPThM, Peterse JL, Hendriks JHCL, Peeters PHM (2004) Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions. Br J Cancer 90: 595-600
20. Santamaŕia G, Velasco M, Farrús B, Zanón G, Fernández PL (2008) Preoperative MRI of pure intraductal carcinoma-a valuable adjunct to mammography in assessment cancer extent. Breast 17: 186-194
21. Sardanelli F, Bacigalupo L, Carbonaro L, Esseridou A, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, Lattanzio V, Del Maschio A (2008) What is the sensitivity of mammography and dynamic MR imaging for DCIS if the whole-breast histopathology is used as a reference standard? Radiol Med (Torino) 113: 439-451
22. Sato M, Fukutomi T, Akashi-Tanaka S, Miyakawa K, Yamamoto N, Hasegawa T (2002) Accuracy in assessing tumour extension according to mammographic subtypes in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. Jpn J Clin Oncol 32: 157-161
23. Schouten van der Velden AP, Boetes C, Bult P, Wobbes T (2006) The value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and size assessment of in situ and small invasive breast carcinoma. Am J Surg 192: 172-189
24. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Martino S, Lewinsky BS, Craig PH, Beron PJ, Gamagami P, Waisman JR (1998) Outcome after invasive local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JCO 16: 1367-1373
25. Sloane JP, Amendoeira I, Apostolikas N, Belklocq JP, Bianchi S, Boecker W, Bussolati G, Coleman D, Connolly CE, Eusebi V (1999) Consistency achieved by 23 European pathologists from 12 countries in diagnosing breast disease and reporting prognostic features of carcinomas. Virchows Archiv 434: 3-10
26. The Sloane Project (2009) Specimen handling protocols and reporting guidelines. http://www.sloaneproject.co.uk/ Accessed on 1 April
27. Thomas JS, Hanby AM, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Macartney JM, Clements K, Lawrence G, Bishop HM (2008) Implications of inconsistent measurement of ER status in non-invasive breast cancer: a study of 1684 cases from the Sloane Project. Breast J 14: 33-38
28. van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Kersschot E, Colpaert C, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, Tjalma W, De Schepper A, Weyler J, Parizel P (2007) MR mammography is useful in the preoperative locoregional staging of breast carcinomas with extensive intraductal component. Eur J Radiol 62: 273-282
29. Vicini FA, Kestin LL, Goldstein NS, Baglan KL, Pettinga JE, Martinez AA (2001) Relationship between excision volume, margin status, and tumor size with the development of local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ treated with breast-conserving therapy. J Surg Oncol 76: 245-254