The nonlinear nature of the relationships between the patent traits and corporate performance

Scientometrics

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 201-210

  Chen, Yu Shan ^a   Chang, Ke Chiun ^a  

^a NATIONAL YUNLIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Corporate performance; HHI of patents; Patent analysis; Patent citations; Relative patent position (RPP)

Indexed keywords

EID: 75549086292     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0101-3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bettis, R. A., & Hitt, M. A. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16(Special Summer Issue), 7-19.
2. Cybenko, G. (1989). Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Math Control Signal System, 2, 303-314.
3. Ernst, H. (1998). Patent portfolios for strategic R& D planning. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15(4), 279-308.
4. Grabowski, H., & Vernon, J. (1990). A new look at the returns and risks to pharmaceutical R& D. Management Science, 36, 804-821.
5. Hall, B. H. (2002). A note on the bias in the Herfindahl based on count data. In A. Jaffe & M. Trajtenberg (Eds.), Patents, citations, and innovations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. Rand Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16-38.
7. Hall, M., & Tideman, N. (1967). Measures of concentration. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 162-168.
8. Haykin, S. (1994). Neural networks. New York: Macmillan College Company.
9. Hirschey, M., & Richardson, V. J. (2004). Are scientific indicators of patent quality useful to investors? Journal of Empirical Finance, 11(1), 91-107.
10. Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989), Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximations. Neural Networks, 2, 336-359.
11. Lee, Y. G., Lee, J. D., Song, Y. I., & Lee, S. J. (2007). An in-depth empirical analysis of patent citation counts using zero-inflated count data model: The case of KIST. Scientometrics, 70(1), 27-39.
12. Lin, B., & Chen, J. (2005). Corporate technology portfolios and R& D performance measures: A study of technology intensive firms. R& D Management, 35(2), 157-170.
13. Markides, C. C., & Williamson, P. J. (1994). Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 149-165.
14. McMillan, E. (2004). Complexity, organizations and change. London: Routledge.
15. Nagaoka, S. (2005). Determinants of high-royalty contracts and the impact of stronger protection of intellectual property rights in Japan. Journal of the Japanese & International Economies, 19(2), 233-254.
16. Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16(2-4), 143-155.
17. Nayak, P. C., Sudheer, K. P., Rangan, D. M., & Ramasastri, K. S. (2004). A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modeling hydrological time series. Journal of Hydrology, 291, 52-66.
18. Polanco, X., François, C., & Keim, J.-P. (1998). Artificial neural network technology for the classification and cartography of scientific and technical information. Scientometrics, 41(1-2), 69-82.
19. Polanco, X., François, C., & Lamirel, J.-C. (2001). Using artificial neural networks for mapping of science and technology: A multi-self-organizing-maps approach. Scientometrics, 51(1), 267-292.
20. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
21. Scherer, F. M., & Ross, D. (1990). Industrial market structure and economic performance (pp. 73-79). Dallas, TX: Houghton Mifflin.
22. Soete, L., & Wyatt, S. (1983). The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator. Scientometrics, 5(1), 31-54.
23. Stacey, R. D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
24. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305.
25. Wasserman, P. D. (1994). Advanced methods in neural computing. New York: van Nostrand Reinhold.
26. White, H. (1989). Some asymptotic results for learning in single hidden layer feedforward network models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 1003-1013.
27. Wray, B., Palmer, A., & Bejou, D. (1994). Using neural network analysis to evaluate buyer-seller relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 28(10), 32-48.