Evaluation of a computer interactive multimedia program in smoking cessation counseling (CIMPSCC) for pharmacy students

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand

Volumn 92, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1516-1523

  Chaikoolvatana, Anun ^a   Kitiwongsoonthorn, Usanee ^b  

^a Department of Mathematics   (Thailand)

^b Ubon Ratchathani   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Computer assisted instruction; Counseling; Multimedia; Program evaluation; Smoking cessation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CASE MANAGEMENT; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MULTIMEDIA; PHARMACY STUDENT; SELF EVALUATION; SMOKING CESSATION; TEACHING; VIDEORECORDING; ADULT; COUNSELING; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; COUNSELING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MULTIMEDIA; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SMOKING CESSATION; STUDENTS, PHARMACY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 75349113809     PISSN: 01252208     EISSN: 01252208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. World Health Organization. World health report 2002. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
2. st century: policy recommendations for smoking cessation and treatment of tobacco dependence. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
3. World Health Organization. WHO CVD-risk management package for low-and mediumresource settings. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
4. National Statistic Department, Thailand. An annual report of smoking behaviors of Thai population 2001. Bangkok: The Agricultural Co-operative Federation of Thailand; 2001.
5. Pongpanich S. A comparative analysis between present and future tobacco related health care costs in Thailand. J Health Res 2007; 21: 163-71.
6. Doll R, Peto R, Wheatley K, Gray R, Sutherland I. Mortality in relation to smoking: 40 years' observations on male British doctors. BMJ 1994; 309: 901-11.
7. Glasgow RE, Mullooly JP, Vogt TM, Stevens VJ, Lichtenstein E, Hollis JF, et al. Biochemical validation of smoking status: pros, cons, and data from four low-intensity intervention trials. Addict Behav 1993; 18: 511-27.
8. Lichtenstein E, Glasgow RE. Smoking cessation: what have we learned over the past decade? J Consult Clin Psychol 1992; 60: 518-27.
9. Chapman S. Stop-smoking clinics: a case for their abandonment. Lancet 1985; 1: 918-20.
10. Fiore MC, Thompson SA, Lawrence DL, Welsch S, Andrews K, Ziarnik M, et al. Helping Wisconsin women quit smoking: a successful collaboration. WMJ 2000; 99: 68-72.
11. Fiore MC, Novotny TE, Pierce JP, Giovino GA, Hatziandreu EJ, Newcomb PA, et al. Methods used to quit smoking in the United States. Do cessation programs help? JAMA 1990; 263: 2760-5.
12. Schmid TL, Jeffery RW, Hellerstedt WL. Direct mail recruitment to home-based smoking and weight control programs: a comparison of strategies. Prev Med 1989; 18: 503-17.
13. Wagner EH, Schoenbach VJ, Orleans CT, Grothaus LC, Saunders KW, Curry S, et al. Participation in a smoking cessation program: a population-based perspective. Am J Prev Med 1990; 6: 258-66.
14. de Vries H, Brug J. Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 99-105.
15. Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ, Glassman B. One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print materials. Ann Behav Med 1999; 21: 276-83.
16. Strecher VJ. Computer-tailored smoking cessation materials: a review and discussion. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 107-17.
17. Slocum AC, Beard CA. Development of a CAI module comparison of its effectiveness with traditional classroom instruction. Clothing Textiles Res J 2005; 23: 298-306.
18. Lynch DC, Whitley TW, Emmerling DA, Brinn JE. Variables that may enhance medical students' perceived preparedness for computer-based testing. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000; 7: 469-74.
19. Liu JE, Pothiban L, Lu Z, Khamphonsiri T. Computer knowledge, attitudes, and skills of nurses in People's Hospital of Beijing Medical University. Comput Nurs 2000; 18: 197-206.
20. Sewell DR, Stevens RG, Lewis JA. Pharmacology experimental benefits from the use of computerassisted learning. Am J Pharm Educ 1996; 60: 303-7.
21. Bearman M, Cesnik B, Liddell M. Random comparison of virtual patient' models in the context of teaching clinical communication skills. Med Educ 2001; 35: 824-32.
22. Walker D, Ross JM. Therapeutic computing: teaching therapeutic communications utilizing a videodisc. Comput Nurs 1995; 13: 103-8.
23. Devitt P, Palmer E. Computers in medical education 1: evaluation of a problem-orientated learning package. Aust N Z J Surg 1998; 68: 284-7.
24. Andrews PV, Schwarz J, Helme RD. Students can learn medicine with computers. Evaluation of an interactive computer learning package in geriatric medicine. Med J Aust 1992; 157: 693-5.
25. Chaikoolvatana A, Ponsri C, Pronchinawog R, Nasok A. Computer-aided learning in congestive heart failure (CHF) patient history taking for pharmacy students. Siriraj Hosp Gaz 2004; 56: 231-41.
26. Weller J, Robinson B, Larsen P, Caldwell C. Simulation-based training to improve acute care skills in medical undergraduates. N Z Med J 2004; 117: U1119.
27. Guy WA, Pittz GW. A computerized case study exercise for clinical pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ 1982; 46: 267-69.
28. Glenn J. A consumer-oriented model for evaluating computer-assisted instructional materials for medical education. Acad Med 1996; 71: 251-5.
29. Newble DI, Swanson DB. Psychometric characteristics of the objective structured clinical examination. Med Educ 1988; 22: 325-34.
30. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D. A Canadian simulation experience: faculty and student opinions of a performance evaluation study. Br J Anesth 2000; 85: 779-81.