An institutional theory analysis of charter schools: Addressing institutional challenges to scale

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 414-431

  Huerta, Luis A ^a   Zuckerman, Andrew ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 75249102386     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01619560902973621     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Achievement First. (2009). Visit our schools. Retrieved February 7, 2009, from http://www.achievementfirst.org/schools.html
2. Bidwell, C. E. (2006). Varieties of institutional research: traditions and prospects for educational research. In H. D.Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 33-50). Albany: State University of New York Press.
3. Boyd, W. L., & Crowson, R. (2002). The quest for a new hierarchy in education: From loose coupling back to tight? Journal of Educational Administration, 40(6), 521-533.
4. Brown, H., Henig, J. R., Lacireno-Paquet, N., & Holyoke, T. T. (2004). Scale of operations and locus of control in marketversus mission-oriented charter schools. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1035-1051.
5. Bulkley, K. (2002). Recentralizing decentralization? Educational management organizations and charter schools' educational programs (OP-60). New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.
6. Bulkley, K., & Hicks, J. (2003). Educational management organizations and the development of professional community in charter schools (OP-69). New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.
7. Burch, P. (2007). Educational policy and practice from the perspective of institutional theory: Crafting a wider lens. Educational Researcher, 36(2), 84-95.
8. Carnoy, M., Jacobsen, R., Mishel, L., & Rothstein, R. (2005). The charter school dust-up: Examining the evidence on enrollment and achievement. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
9. Center for Education Reform. (2006). National Charter Schools Week 2006. Retrieved July 15, 2006, from http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=stateStats&pSectionID=15&cSectionID=44
10. Chubb, J., & Moe, T. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's public schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
11. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (pp. 3-21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
12. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
13. Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1-26.
14. Fuller, B. (2000). The public square, big or small? Charter schools in political context. In B. Fuller (Ed.), Inside charter schools: The paradox of radical decentralization (pp. 12-65). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Fuller, B., Gawlik, M., Gonzales, E., & Park, S. (2004). Localized ideas of fairness: Inequality among charter schools. In K. E. Bulkley & P. Wohlstetter (Eds.), Taking account of charter schools: What's happened and what's next (pp. 93-120). New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Harvey, J., & Rainey, L. (2006). High quality charter schools at scale in big cities: Results of a symposium. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education, National Charter School Research Project.
17. Hassel, B. (2003). Friendly competition. Education Next, 3(1), 8-15.
18. Henderson, A. (2001). Community organizing for school reform, Washington, DC: A recovering plantation. New York: Institute for Education and Social Policy, New York University.
19. Henig, J. R., Holyoke, T. T., Brown, H., & Lacireno-Paquet, N. (2005). The influence of founder type on charter school structures and operations. American Journal of Education, 111(4), 487-522.
20. Hoxby, C. M. (2004a). Achievement in charter schools and regular public schools in the United States: Understanding the differences. Cambridge, MA: Department of Economics, Harvard University.
21. Hoxby, C. M. (2004b). A straightforward comparison of charter schools and public schools in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Department of Economics, Harvard University.
22. Huerta, L. A. (2000). The loss of public accountability? A home schooling charter school in rural California. In B. Fuller (Ed.), Inside charter schools: The paradox of radical decentralization (pp. 177-202). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Huerta, L. A. (2007, August). Institutional vs. technical environments: A framework for analysis of evolving charter school organizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York.
24. Huerta, L. A. (2009). Institutional v. technical environments: Reconciling the goals of decentralization in an evolving charter school organization. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 244-261.
25. Huerta, L. A., & Zuckerman, A. (2007, November). Identifying institutional constraints on innovation in school choice reform. Paper presented at the Conference of Public School Choice in a Post-Desegregation World: What Have We Learned and Where Are We Going? University of Connecticut, Storrs.
26. Kolderie, T. (2004). Creating the capacity for change: How and why governors and legislatures are opening a new-schools sector in public education. Bethesda, MD: Education Week Press.
27. Lake, R. (2007). Identifying and replicating the "DNA" of successful charter schools: Lessons from the private sector. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education, National Charter School Research Project.
28. Lubienski, C. (2001). Redefining "public" education: Charter schools, common schools, and the rhetoric of reform. Teachers College Record, 103(4), 634-666.
29. Lubienski, C. (2003). Innovation in education markets: Theory and evidence on the impact of competition and choice in charter schools. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 395-443.
30. Lubienski, C. (2004). Charter school innovation in theory and practice: Autonomy, r&d, and curricular conformity. In K. E. Bulkley & P.Wohlstetter (Eds.), Taking account of charter schools: What's happened and what's next (pp. 72-90). New York: Teachers College Press.
31. Lubienski, C. (2005). Public schools in marketized environments: Shifting incentives and unintended consequences of competition-based educational reforms. American Journal of Education, 111, 464-486.
32. Lubienski, S. T., & Lubienski, C. (2006). School sector and academic achievement: A multi level analysis of NAEP mathematics data. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 651-698.
33. Meyer, H. D. (2006). The rise and decline of the common school as an institution: Taking "myth and ceremony" seriously. In H. D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 51-66). Albany: State University of New York Press.
34. Meyer, H. D., & Rowan, B. (2006a). The new institutionalism in education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
35. Meyer, H. D., & Rowan, B. (2006b). Institutional analysis and the study of education. In H. D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 1-14). Albany: State University of New York Press.
36. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
37. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1978). The structure of educational organizations. In M. W. Meyer, W. R. Scott, B. Rowan, & T. E. Deal (Eds.) Environments and organizations (pp. 78-109). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38. Meyer, J.W., Scott,W. R., & Deal, T. E. (1983). Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organizations. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 45-67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39. Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., & Strang, D. (1987). Centralization, fragmentation, and school district complexity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 186-201.
40. Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., Strang, D., & Creighton, A. L. (1988). Bureaucratization without centralization: Changes in the organizational system of U.S. public education, 1940-80. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 139-167). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
41. Miron, G., & Nelson, C. (2002). What's public about charter schools? Lessons learned about choice and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
42. Molnar, A., Wilson, G., & Allen, D. (2004). Profiles of for-profit education management companies 2003-2004. Retrieved September 2, 2007, from http://epsl.asu.edu.
43. Nathan, J. (1996). Charter schools: Creating hope and opportunity for American education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44. National Charter School Research Project. (2007). Quantity counts: The growth of charter school management organizations. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education, National Charter School Research Project.
45. New Schools Venture Fund. (2006). Charter management organizations: Toward scale with quality. Retrieved October 2, 2007, from http://www.newschools.org
46. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
47. Powell, W. J., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In W. J. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63-82). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
48. Rowan, B. (2006). The new institutionalism and the study of educational organizations: Changing ideas for changing times. In H. D.Meyer&B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 15-32). Albany: State University of New York Press.
49. Rowan, B., & Miskel, C. G. (1999). Institutional theory and the study of educational organizations. In J. Murphy & K. Seashore-Luis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 359-382). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
50. Schneiberg, M., & Clemens, E. S. (2006). The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory, 24(3), 195-227.
51. Scott, J. (2009). The politics of venture philanthropy and charter school policy and advocacy. Educational Policy, 23(1), 106-136.
52. Scott, W. R. (1998). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (fifth edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
54. Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The organization of societal sectors: Propositions and early evidence. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 108-140). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
55. Shanker, A. (1988). Restructuring our schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 65(3), 88-100.
56. Spillane, J., & Burch, P. (2006). The institutional environment and instructional practice: Changing patterns of guidance and control in public education. In H. D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 87-102). Albany: State University of New York Press.
57. Thernstrom, A., & Thernstrom, S. (2003). No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning. New York: Simon & Schuster.
58. Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1994). Institutional analyses of organizations: Legitimate but not institutionalized. Los Angeles: Institute for Social Science Research, University of California, Los Angeles.
59. Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The "grammar" of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453-479.
60. Weick, K. L. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
61. Wexler, E., & Huerta, L. A. (2000). An empowering spirit is not enough: A Latino charter school struggles over leadership. In B. Fuller (Ed.), Inside charter schools: The paradox of radical decentralization (pp. 98-123). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. Wilson, S. (2005). Realizing the promise of brand-name schools. In D. Ravitch (Ed), Brookings papers on education policy (pp. 89-135). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
63. Wohlstetter, P., & Griffin, N. C. (2001). Building a plane while flying it: Early lessons from developing charter schools. Teachers College Record, 103(2), 336-365.
64. Zucker, L. G. (1991). Postscript: Microfoundations of institutional thought. In W. J. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 103-107). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.