Annotation confidence score for genome annotation: A genome comparison approach

Bioinformatics

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 22-29

  Yang, Youngik ^a   Gilbert, Donald ^b   Kim, Sun ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 75249085091     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp613     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Altschul, S.F. et al. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 215, 403-410.
2. Berry, M.W. (2003) Survey of Text Mining I: Clustering, Classification, and Retrieval. Springer, New York, p. 26.
3. Centre for Horticulture and Lanscape, The Richards Function, The University of Reading, UK. Available at http://www.horticultureandlandscape.rdg.ac.uk/hlm_richards.htm (last accessed date November 11, 2009).
4. Chakrabati, S. (2002) Mining the Web: Discovering Knowledge form Hypertext Data, 1st edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Fransisco, CA, p. 49.
5. Christiane, F. (1998) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
6. Huang, H. et al. (2003) iProClass: an integrated database of protein family, function and structure information. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 390-392.
7. Iliopoulos, I. et al. (2003) Evaluation of annotation strategies using an entire genome sequence, Bioinformatics, 19, 717-726.
8. Illunima Inc. (2007) DNA sequencing with Solexa technology. Available at http://www.illumina.com/downloads/SS_DNAsequencing.pdf (last accessed date December 10, 2008).
9. Liu, H. et al. (2006a) BioThesaurus: a web-based thesaurus of protein and gene names. Bioinformatics, 22, 103-105.
10. Liu, H. et al. (2006b) Quantitative Assessment of Dictionary-based Protein Named Entity Tagging. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 13, 497-507.
11. Markowitz, V.M. et al. (2008) The integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system in 2007: data content and analysis tool extensions. Nucleic Acids Res., 36 (Database issue), 528-533.
12. Mikkelsen, T.S. et al. (2005) Improving genome annotations using phylogenetic profile anomaly detection, Bioinformatics, 21, 464-470.
13. Nagy, A. et al. (2008) Identification and correction of abnormal, incomplete and mispredicted proteins in public databases. BMC Bioinform., 9, 353.
14. NIH (2007) An Overview of MeSH. Available at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/presentations/EAHIL_krakow_2007_sep/mesh_overview/index.htm (last accessed date November 11, 2009).
15. Overbeek, R. et al. (1999) The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 2896-2901.
16. Porter, M.F. (1980) An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 4, 130-137.
17. Protein existence (2008) http://www.uniprot.org/manual/protein_existence (last accessed date December 10, 2008).
18. Richards, F.J. (1959) A flexible growth function for empirical use. J. Exp. Bot., 10, 290-300.
19. Sanger, F. and Coulson, A.R. (1975) A rapid method for determining sequences in DNA by primed synthesis with DNA polymerase. J. Mol. Biol., 94, 441-448.
20. Sanger, F. et al. (1977) DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 74, 5463-5467.
21. Tatusov, R.L. et al. (1997) A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 278, 631-637.
22. Thompson, J.D. et al. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res., 11, 4673-4680.
23. Wicker, T. et al. (2006) 454 sequencing put to the test using the complex genome of barley. BMC Genomics, 7, 275.