Toward the fast blind docking of a peptide to a target protein by using a four-body statistical pseudo-potential

Computational Biology and Chemistry

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 53-62

  Aita, Takuyo ^a   Nishigaki, Koichi ^a   Husimi, Yuzuru ^a  

^a SAITAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Binding mode; Binding pocket; Binding site; Delaunay tessellation; Four body potential; Ligand

Indexed keywords

BINDING MODES; BINDING POCKET; BINDING POCKETS; BODY POTENTIAL; DELAUNAY TESSELLATIONS;

AMINO ACIDS; BINDING ENERGY; BIOCHEMISTRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATION THEORY; DOCKING; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; ORGANIC ACIDS; PEPTIDES; TARGETS;

BINDING SITES;

PEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLISM; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 75149169177     PISSN: 14769271     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2009.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arun Prasad P., and Gautham N. A new peptide docking strategy using a mean field technique with mutually orthogonal Latin square sampling. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 22 (2008) 815-829
2. Bandyopadhyay D., and Snoeyink J. Almost-Delaunay simplices: nearest neighbor relations for imprecise points. SODA 2004: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, USA (2004) 410-419
3. Deutsch C., and Krishnamoorthy B. Four-body scoring function for mutagenesis. Bioinformatics 23 (2007) 3009-3015
4. Ghersi, D., Sanchez, R., 2008. Improving accuracy and efficiency of blind protein-ligand docking by focusing on predicted binding sites. Proteins, July 17 [Epub ahead of print].
5. Hetenyi C., and van der Spoel D. Efficient docking of peptides to proteins without prior knowledge of the binding site. Protein Sci. 11 (2002) 1729-1737
6. Hetenyi C., and van der Spoel D. Blind docking of drug-sized compounds to proteins with up to a thousand residues. FEBS Lett. 580 (2006) 1447-1450
7. Kitamura, K., Yoshida, C., Kinoshita, C., Kadowaki, T., Takahashi, Y., Tayama, T., Kawakubo, T., Naimuddin, M., Salimullah, Md., Nemoto, N., Hanada, K., Husimi, Y., Yamamoto, K., Nishigaki, K., 2009. Development of systemic in vitro evolution and its application to generation of peptide aptamer-based inhibitors of cathepsin E. J. Mol. Biol. 387, 1186-1198.
8. Krishnamoorthy B., and Tropsha A. Development of a four-body statistical pseudo-potential to discriminate native from non-native protein conformations. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) 1540-1548
9. Masso M., and Vaisman I.I. Accurate prediction of enzyme mutant activity based on a multibody statistical potential. Bioinformatics 23 (2007) 3155-3161
10. Masso M., and Vaisman I.I. Computational mutagenesis studies of protein structure function correlations. Proteins 64 (2006) 234-245
11. Mersich C., and Jungbauer A. Generation of bioactive peptides by biological libraries. J. Chromatogr. B 861 (2008) 160-170
12. Morris G.M., Goodsell D.S., Huey R., and Olson A.J. Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 10 (1996) 293-304
13. Munson P.J., and Singh R.K. Statistical significance of hierarchical multi-body potentials based on Delaunay tessellation and their application in sequence-structure alignment. Protein Sci. 6 (1997) 1467-1481
14. Preparata F.P., and Shamos M.I. Computational Geometry: An Introduction (1985), Springer, New York
15. Shoichet B.K., and Kuntz I.D. Matching chemistry and shape in molecular docking. Protein Eng. 6 (1993) 723-732
16. Tropsha A., Singh R.K., and Vaisman I.I. Delaunay tessellation of proteins: four body nearest neighbor propensities of amino acid residues. J. Comput. Biol. 3 (1996) 213-222
17. Tropsha, A., Vaismann, I.I., Zheng, W., 1998. Compositional preferences in quadruplets of nearest neighbor residues in protein structures: statistical geometry analysis. IEEE International Joint Symposia on Intelligence and Systems. pp. 163.
18. Valencia C.A., Cotten S.W., Dong B., and Liu R. mRNA-display-based selections for proteins with desired functions: a protease-substrate case study. Biotechnol. Prog. 24 (2008) 561-569
19. Wang J., Kollman P.A., and Kuntz I.D. Flexible ligand docking: a multistep strategy approach. Proteins 36 (1999) 1-19
20. Warren G.L., Andrews C.W., Capelli A.M., Clarke B., LaLonde J., Lambert M.H., Lindvall M., Nevins N., Semus S.F., Senger S., Tedesco G., Wall I.D., Woolven J.M., Peishoff C.E., and Head M.S. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J. Med. Chem. 49 (2006) 5912-5931