Trapped at the edge: On long-distance pair-list readings

Lingua

Volumn 120, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 463-484

  Cheng, Lisa Lai Shen ^a   Demirdache, Hamida ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Choice functions; Covert movement; Indirect dependency; Island effects; Long distance questions; Multiple questions; Multiple wh movement; Pair list triple list readings; Partial movement; Successive cyclicity

Indexed keywords

EID: 75149154675     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Agüero-Bautista, C., 2001. Cyclicity and the scope of wh-phrases, M.I.T.: PhD Dissertation.
2. Bittner M. Cross-linguistic semantics for questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (1998) 1-82
3. Bošković Z. On the Interpretation of Multiple Questions. Linguistic Variation Yearbook (2001), John Benjamin's, Amsterdam
4. Cheng, L.L.-S., Demirdache, H., in preparation. Cyclicity and covert movement. ms. Leiden University and Université de Nantes.
5. Chierchia G. Questions with quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics 1.2 (1993) 191-234
6. Comorovski I. Interrogative Phrases and the Syntax-Semantics Interface (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
7. Dayal V. Locality in wh Quantification (1996), Kluwer, Dordrecht
8. Dayal, V., 1996b. Scope marking. Defense of Indirect Dependency. In: Lutz, U., Müller, G. (Eds.) Papers on 'Wh-Scope Marking'. (Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340, Bericht Nr. 76). Universität Tübingen. 107-130.
9. Dayal V. Scope Marking: Cross Linguistic Variation in Indirect Dependency. In: Lutz U., Müller G., and von Stechow A. (Eds). Wh-Scope Marking (2000), Benjamins, Amsterdam 157-194
10. Dayal V. Single-pair versus multiple-pair answers: wh-in situ and scope. Linguistic Inquiry 33 (2002) 512-520
11. Engdahl E. Constituent Questions (1986), Reidel, Dordrecht
12. É. Kiss K. Wh-movement and specificity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11 (1993) 85-120
13. Fox D., and Pesetsky D. Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31 (2005) 1-45
14. Grebenyova, L., 2004a. Interpretation of slavic multiple Wh-questions. In: Arnaudova, O., Browne, W., Rivero, M.L., Stojanović, D., (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL 12). Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 169-186.
15. Hagstrom, P., 1998. Decomposing Questions. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
16. Higginbotham J., and May R. Questions, quantifiers and crossing. The Linguistic Review 1 (1981) 41-79
17. Hornstein N. Logical Form: From GB to minimalism (1995), Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass
18. Horvath J. The status of 'WH-expletives' and the partial WH-movement construction of Hungarian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15 (1997) 509-572
19. Horvath J. On the Syntax of 'Wh-Scope Marker' constructions: some comparative evidence. In: Lutz U., Müller G., and von Stechow A. (Eds). Wh-Scope Marking (2000), Benjamins, Amsterdam 271-316
20. Ito, S., 2005. Single-pair answers and pair-list answers in wh-questions with singular wh. MA thesis. University of Tokyo.
21. Lewis, John D., 1999. On multiple wh-questions: weak crossover, D-linking, and the third wh-phrase effect. In: Bird, S., Carnie, A., Haugen, Jason D., Norquest, P. (Eds.), WCCFL 18: Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics.
22. Lipták A., and Zimmermann M. Indirect scope marking again: a case for generalized question formation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25 (2007) 103-155
23. Lutz, U., Müller, G. (Eds.), 1996. Papers on 'Wh-Scope Marking'. (Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340, Bericht Nr. 76). Universität Tübingen.
24. In: Lutz U., Müller G., and von Stechow A. (Eds). Wh-Scope Marking (2000), Benjamins, Amsterdam
25. Nishigauchi T. Quantification in the Theory of Grammar (1990), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
26. Ratiu, D., 2005. Questions multiples en Roumain. Master 2 thesis, Université de Nantes.
27. Ratiu, D., 2007. Evidence for (counter) cyclic movement from Romanian. Paper presented at the 37th Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages.
28. Richards N. Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures (2001), Oxford University Press, Oxford
29. Reinhart T. Wh-in situ in the framework of the minimalist program. Natural Language Semantics 6 (1998) 29-56
30. von Stechow A. Against LF pied-piping. Natural Language Semantics 4 (1996) 57-110
31. Sternefeld, W., 2001. Partial movement constructions, pied piping, and higher order choice functions. In: Féry, C., Sternefeld, W., (Eds.), Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow (pp. 473-486). Berlin: Akademieverlag.
32. Sternefeld W. Wh-expletives and partial Wh-movement: two non-existing concepts?. In: Abraham W., and Zwart C.J.-W. (Eds). Issues in Formal German(ic) Typology (2002), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 285-305