Selection of intraocular lenses in patients with uveitis

International Ophthalmology Clinics

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 61-70

  Perry, Lynn J P ^a   Papaliodis, George N ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID; SILICONE;

AMBLYOPIA; APHAKIA; ASTIGMATISM; BINOCULAR VISION; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CONVERGENT STRABISMUS; EPITHELIUM CELL; EYE SURGERY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HEALING; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMETRY; LACERATION; LENS EPITHELIUM; LENS IMPLANT; LENSECTOMY; PHOTOPHOBIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA DETACHMENT; REVIEW; SCAR FORMATION; STRABISMUS; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UVEITIS; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VITREOUS HEMORRHAGE;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CATARACT; HUMANS; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; UVEITIS;

EID: 75149147721     PISSN: 00208167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IIO.0b013e3181c55503     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Alpar JJ, Fechner PU. "Past History of Lens Implantation" in Fechner's Intraocular Lenses. New York: Thieme-Stratton Corp; 1986:4-5.
2. Alpar JJ, Fechner PU. History of Modern Lens Implantation" in Fechner's Intraocular Lenses. New York: Thieme-Stratton Corp; 1986:6-23.
3. Hoffer KJ. "The evolution of the intraocular lens". In: Steinert RF, et al, ed. Cataract Surgery: Techniques, Complications, and Management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004:375-393.
4. Ridley H. Intra-ocular acrylic lenses after cataract extraction. Lancet. 1952;259: 118-121.
5. Liesegang TJ, Bourne WM, Brubaker RF. The effect of cataract surgery on the bloodaqueous barrier. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:399-402.
6. Saika S, Miyamoto T, Kawashima Y, et al. Immunolocalization of TGF - beta1, - beta2, and - beta3, and TGF-beta receptors in human lens capsules with lens implants. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:283--293.
7. Zhou ZH, He SZ. An experimental study of the interleukin 1 levels in aqueous humor after intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmologica. 1998;212:157-159.
8. Kochounian HH, Kovacs SA, Sy J, et al. Identification of intraocular lens-adsorbed proteins in mammalian in vitro and in vivo systems. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112: 395-401.
9. Laurell CG, Zetterstrom C. Inflammation and blood-aqueous barrier disruption. J. Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:306-307.
10. Laurell CG, Zetterstrom C, Lundgren B, et al. Inflammatory response in the rabbit after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation using a 5.2mm or 11.0mm incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:126-131. (Pubitemid 27147589)
11. Nishi O, Nishi K. Fibrin reaction and its cause. Prostaglandin E2-synthesis by residual lens epithelial cells. Dev Ophthalmol. 1991;22:126-131.
12. DeCroos FC, Afshari NS. Perioperative antibiotics and anti-inflammatory agents in cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19:22-26.
13. Lindstrom RL, Davis EA. "Polymethacrylate intraocular lenses". In: Steinert RF, et al, ed. Cataract Surgery: Techniques, Complications, and Management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004;394-404.
14. Doan KT, Olson RJ, Mamalis N. Survey of intraocular lens material and design. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002;13:24-29.
15. Leaming DV. Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members-2003 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:892-900.
16. Laube T, Apel H, Koch HR. Ultraviolet radiation absorption of intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:880-885.
17. Mainster MA. The spectra, classification, and rationale of ultraviolet-protective intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;102:727-732.
18. Ravalico G, Baccara F, Lovisato A, et al. Postoperative cellular reaction on various intraocular lens materials. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1084-1091.
19. Roesel M, Heinz C, Heimes B, et al. Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of two foldable acrylic intraocular lenses in patients with endogenous uveitis- a prospective randomized study. Graefes Arch Clinc Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246: 1609-1615.
20. Samuelson TW, Chu YR, Kreiger RA. Evaluation of giant cell deposits on foldable intraocular lenses after combined cataract and glaucoma surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:817-823.
21. Gimbal HV, Neuhann T. Development, advantages, and methods of the continuous vircular capsulorhexis technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16:31-37.
22. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG, et al. Biocompatibility of poly(methylmethacrylate), silicone, and AcrySof intraocular lenses: randomized comparison of the cellular reaction on the anterior lens surface. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24: 361-366.
23. Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schild G, et al. Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of 2 foldable acrylic intraocular lenses in patients with uveitis or pseudoexfoliation syndrome: comparison to a control group. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28: 1160-1172.
24. Werner L. Biocompatibility of intraocular lens materials. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19:41-49.
25. Hayashi K, Hayashi H. Influence on posterior capsule opacification and visual function of intraocular lens optic material. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:195-202.
26. Ursell PG, Spalton DJ, Pande MV, et al. Relationship between intraocular lens biomaterials and posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24: 352-360.
27. Nishi O, Nishi K, Sakanishi K. Inhibition of migrating lens epithelial cells at the capsular bend created by the rectangular optic edge of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998;29:587-594.
28. Dewey S. Posterior capsule opacification. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:45-53.
29. Kohnen T, Fabian E, Gerl R, et al. Optic edge design as long-term factor for posterior capsular opacification rates. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1308-1314.
30. Kugelberg M, Wejde G, Jayaram H, et al. Two-year follow-up of posterior capsule opacification after implantation of a hydrophilic or hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86:533-536.
31. Li N, Chen X, Zhang J, et al. Effect of AcrySof versus silicone or polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115:830-838.
32. Nishi O, Yamamoto N, Nishi K, et al. Contact inhibition of migrating lens epithelial cells at the capsular bend created by a sharp-edged intraocular lens after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1065-1070.
33. Katayama Y, Kobayakawa S, Yanagawa H, et al. The relationship between the adhesion characteristics of acrylic intraocular lens materials and posterior capsule opacification. Ophthalmic Res. 2007;39:276-281.
34. Schild G, Schauersberger J, Amon M, et al. Lens epithelial cell ongrowth: comparison o 6 types of hydrophilic intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31: 2375-2378.
35. Müllner-Eidenböck A, Amon M, Schauersberger J, et al. Cellular reaction on the anterior surface of 4 types of intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27: 734-740.
36. Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schild G, et al. Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:50-61.
37. Cunanan CM, Tarbaux NM, Knight PM. Surface properties of intraocular lens materials and their influence on in vitro cell adhesion. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991;17:767-773.
38. Foster CS, Fong LP, Singh G. Cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation in patients with uveitis. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:281-288.
39. Trocme S, Li HL. Effect of heparin-surface modified intraocular lenses on postoperative inflammation after phacoemulsification; a randomized trial in a United States patient population; the Heparin-Surface-Modified Lens Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1031-1037.
40. Mester U, Strauss M, Grewing R. Biocompatibility and blood-aqueous barrier impairment in at-risk eyes with heparin-surface-modified or unmodified lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:380-384.
41. Jones NP. Cataract surgery using heparin-surface-modified intraocular lenses in Fuchs' heterochromic uveitis. Ophthalmic Surg. 1995;26:49-52.
42. Rahman I, Jones NP. Long-term results of cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation in patients with uveitis. Eye. 2005;19:191-197.
43. Kamoi K, Mochizuki M. Phaco dislocation technique in young patients with uveitis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34: 1239-1241.
44. Estafanous MFG, Lowder CY, Meisler DM, et al. Phacoemulsification cataract extraction and posterior chamber lens implantation in patients with uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:620-625.
45. Rauz S, Stavrou P, Murray PI. Evaluation of foldable intraocular lenses in patients with uveitis. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:909-919.
46. Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schild G, et al. Inflammation after implantation of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, or silicone intraocular lenses in eyes with cataract and uveitis: comparison to a control group. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1153-1159. (Pubitemid 34774206)
47. Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schauersberger J, et al. Results of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in uveitic eyes with cataract: comparison to a control group. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1141-1152. (Pubitemid 34774205)
48. Papaliodis GN, Nguyen QD, Samson CM, et al. Intraocular lens tolerance in surgery for cataracta complicata: assessment of four implant materials. Semin Ophthalmol. 2002;17:120-123.
49. Alio JL, Chipont E, BenEzra D, et al. Comparative performance of intraocular lenses in eyes with cataract and uveitis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:2096-2108.
50. Ganesh SK, Babu K, Biswas J. Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in cases of pars planitis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2072-2076.
51. Koura Y, Fukushima A, Nishino K, et al. Inflammatory reaction following cataract surgery and implantation of acrylic intraocular lens in rabbits with endotoxin-induced uveitis. Eye. 2006;20:606-610.