|
Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 84-85
|
The conversation around CPR/DNR should not be revived-at least for now
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CULTURAL FACTOR;
DECISION MAKING;
EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE;
EMERGENCY TREATMENT;
ETHICS;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
LIVING WILL;
PATIENT CARE PLANNING;
PATIENT EDUCATION;
PROGNOSIS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RESUSCITATION;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
STANDARD;
TREATMENT FAILURE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
TRUST;
UNITED STATES;
UNNECESSARY PROCEDURE;
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES;
ADVANCED CARDIAC LIFE SUPPORT;
CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION;
CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS;
DECISION MAKING;
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES;
EMERGENCY TREATMENT;
HEALTH POLICY;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MEDICAL FUTILITY;
PATIENT CARE PLANNING;
PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC;
PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;
PROGNOSIS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RESUSCITATION ORDERS;
SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;
TREATMENT FAILURE;
TRUST;
UNITED STATES;
UNNECESSARY PROCEDURES;
|
EID: 75149135125
PISSN: 15265161
EISSN: 15360075
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/15265160903460988 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (7)
|