Leakage detection in a real distribution network using a SOM

Urban Water Journal

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 279-289

  Aksela, K ^a   Aksela, M ^b   Vahala, R ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b Xtract Oy   (Finland)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Flow; Leakage detection; Self organising map; Water distribution network; Water loss

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; DATA SET; DETECTION METHOD; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FLOW MODELING; LEAKAGE;

EID: 75149126013     PISSN: 1573062X     EISSN: 17449006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15730620802673079     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Almandoz, J., et al., 2005. Leakage assessment through water distribution network simulation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 131 (6), 458-466.
2. Andersen, J.H. and Powell, R.S., 2000. Implicit state-estimation technique for water network monitoring. Urban Water, 2, 123-130.
3. Caputo, A.C. and Pelagagge, P.M., 2002. An inverse approach for piping networks monitoring. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 15, 497-505.
4. Caputo, A.C. and Pelagagge, P.M., 2003. Using neural networks to monitor piping systems. Process Safety Progress, 22 (2), 119-127.
5. Covas, D., Ramos, H., and de Almeida, A.B., 2005. Standing wave difference method for leak detection in pipeline systems. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 131 (12), 1106-1116.
6. Eichenberger, J., 2005. IWA water balance in Canada - 'How are we doing?'. In: Proceedings IWA Leakage Conference, Halifax, Canada.
7. Fantozzi, M., Bazzurro, N., and Mazzola, M., 2005. Progress on implementing the IWA approach in Italy: Case studies, dissemination and training activities of the Italian Water Loss user group and links with European funded projects. In: Proceedings IWA Leakage Conference, Halifax, Canada.
8. Feng, J. and Zhang, H., 2006. Algorithm of pipeline leak detection based on discrete incremental clustering meth- od. In: D.-S. Huang, K. Li, and G.W. Irwin, eds. ICIC 2006, LNAI 4114. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 602-607.
9. Gabrys, B. and Bargiela, A., 1999. Neural networks based detcision support in presence of uncertainties. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 125 (5), 272-280.
10. Giustolisi, O., Savic, D., and Kapelan, Z., 2008. Pressure-driven demand and leakage simulation for water distribution networks. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 134 (5), 626-635.
11. Haykin, S., 1999. Neural Networks. A Comprehensive Foundation. Second ed. Prentice Hall International.
12. Jancović-Nisić, B., et al., 2004. Use of flow meters for managing water supply networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 130 (2), 171-179.
13. Kim Sang Hyun, 2005. Extensive development of leak detection algorithm by impulse response method. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 131 (3), 201-208.
14. Kohonen, T., 1990. The self-organizing map. Proceedings of the IEEE, 78 (9), 1464-1480.
15. Kohonen, T., 1997. Self-organizing maps. Second extended edition. Springer-Verlag.
16. Loveday, M. and Dixon, J., 2005. DMA sustainability in developing countries. In: Proceedings IWA Leakage Conference, Halifax, Canada.
17. MacDonald, G. and Yates, C., 2005. DMA design and implementation, a North American context. In: Proceedings IWA Leakage Conference, Halifax, Canada.
18. Marques, R., Gomes, R., and Monteiro, A., 2005. Bench-marking the water losses in Portugal. In: Proceedings IWA Leakage Conference, Halifax, Canada.
19. Mounce, S.R., et al., 2002. A neural network approach to burst detection. Water Science and Technology, 45 (4-5), 237-246.
20. Mounce, S.R., et al., 2003. Sensor-fusion of hydraulic data for burst detection and location in a treated water distribution system. Information Fusion, 4, 217-229.
21. Mounce, S. and Machell, J., 2006. Burst detection using hydraulic data from water distribution systems with artificial neural networks. Urban Water Journal, 3 (1), 21-31.
22. Pelletier, G., Mailhot, A., and Villeneuve, J.-P., 2003. Modelling water pipe breaks - three case studies. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 129 (2), 115-123.
23. Poulakis, Z., Valougeorgis, D., and Papadimitriou, C., 2003. Leakage detection in water pipe networks using a Bayesian probabilistic framework. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 18, 315-327.
24. Puust, R., et al., 2006. Probabilistic leak detection in pipe networks using the SCEM-UA algorithm. In: 8th Annual Distribution Systems Analysis Symposium. Cincinnati, OH, USA.
25. Pudar, R.S. and Liggett, J.A., 1992. Leaks in pipe networks. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 118 (7), 1031-1046.
26. Shin, E., et al., 2005. A case study of leakage management in the city of Busan, Korea. In: Proceedings IWA Leakage Conference, Halifax, Canada.
27. Stephens, M.L., Simpson, A.R., and Lambert, M.F., 2007. Hydraulic transient analysis and leak detection on transmission pipelines: field tests, model calibration and inverse modeling. In: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007: Restoring Our Natural Habitat. ASCE.
28. Vesanto, J., et al., 2000. SOM Toolbox for Matlab 5. SOM Toolbox Team, Helsinki University of Technology, Report A57, ISBN 951-22-4951-0. http://www.cis.hut.fi/projects/somtoolbox/.
29. Vitkovsky, J.P., Simpson, A.R., and Lambert, M.F., 2000. Leak detection and calibration using transients and genetic algorithms. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 126 (4), 262-265.
30. Walski, T., Chase, D., and Savic, D., 2001. Water distribution modelling. Watertown, CT: Haestad Methods.
31. Yates, C., 2005. Water accountability - the new way. In: Proceedings IWA Leakage Conference, Halifax, Canada.