Co-authorship in accounting history: Advantages and pitfalls

Accounting, Business and Financial History

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 287-303

  Fleischman, Richard K ^a   Schuele, Karen ^a  

^a JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accounting history; Co authorship; Co authorship quantitatively and qualitatively; US and non US co authorship surveys

Indexed keywords

EID: 74949126029     PISSN: 09585206     EISSN: 14664275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09585200903246536     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Antonelli, V., T. Boyns, and F. Cerbioni. 2006. Multiple origins of accounting? An early Italian example of the development of accounting for managerial purposes. European Accounting Review 15, no. 30: 367-401.
2. Antonelli, V., T. Boyns, and F. Cerbioni. 2008. The development of management accounting in Italy: Ansaldo in the early decades of the twentieth century. Accounting Historians Journal 35, no. 1: 49-81.
3. Berland, N., and T. Boyns. 2002. The development of budgetary control in France and Britain from the 1920s to the 1960s: a comparison. European Accounting Review 11, no. 2: 329-56.
4. Boyns, T., J.R. Edwards, and M. Nikitin. 1997. The birth of industrial accounting in France and Britain. New York: Garland Publishing.
5. Brown, C.L., K.C. Chan, and P. Lai. 2006. Marketing journal co-authorships: an empirical analysis of co-authorship behaviour. Journal of Marketing Education 28, no. 1: 17-21.
6. Brown, L.D., and J.C. Gardner. 1985. Using citation analysis to assess the impact of journals and articles on contemporary accounting research (CAR). Journal of Accounting Research 23, no. 1: 84-108.
7. Bryer, R.A., R.K. Fleischman, and R.H. Macve. 2008. Smith, Marx, or Foucault in understanding the early British industrial revolution? A re-examination of management and accounting for capital and labour at the Carron Company. Working paper, University of Warwick, John Carroll University and London School of Economics.
8. Carmona, S., and L. Zan. 2002. Mapping variety in the history of accounting and management practices. European Accounting Review 11, no. 2: 291-304.
9. Carmona, S. 2004. Accounting history research and its diffusion in an international context. Accounting History 9, no. 3: 7-23.
10. Carmona, S. 2006. Performance reviews, the impact of accounting research, and the role of publication forms. Advances in Accounting 22: 241-67.
11. Carnegie, G., and C. Napier. 1996. Critical and interpretive histories: insights into accounting's present and future through its past. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 9, no. 3: 7-39.
12. Carnegie, G.D., and R.H. Parker. 1994.The firstAustralian book on accounting: James Dimelow's Practical Book-Keeping Made Easy. Abacus 30, no. 1: 78-97.
13. Carnegie, G.D., and R.H. Parker. 1996. The transfer of accounting technology in the southern hemisphere: the case of William ButlerYaldwyn. Accounting, Business & Financial History 6, no. 1: 23-49.
14. Carnegie, G.D., and R.H. Parker. 1999. Accountants and empire: the case of co-membership of Australian and British accounting bodies, 1885-1914. Accounting, Business & Financial History 9, no. 1: 77-102.
15. Carnegie, G.D., and B.N. Potter. 2000. Publishing patterns in specialist accounting history journals in the English language, 1996-1999. Accounting Historians Journal 27, no. 2: 177-98.
16. Edwards, J.R., ed. 2000. The history of accounting: critical perspectives on business management. 4 vols. London: Routledge.
17. Ettredge, M.L., and B. Wong-On-Wing. 1991. Publication opportunities in accounting research journals: 1970-1988. Issues in Accounting Education 6, no. 20: 239-47.
18. Ezzamel, M.A., K.W. Hoskin, and R.H. Macve. 1990. Managing it all by numbers: a review of Johnson and Kaplan's Relevance Lost. Accounting and Business Research 20, no. 78: 153-66.
19. Fleischman, R.K., ed. 2006. Accounting history. 3 vols. London: Sage Publications.
20. Fleischman, R.K., K.W. Hoskin, and R.H. Macve. 1995. The Boulton & Watt case: the crux of alternative approaches to accounting history? Accounting and Business Research 25, no. 99: 162-76.
21. Fleischman, R.K., and R.H. Macve. 2002. Coals from Newcastle: alternative histories of cost and management accounting in northeast coal mining during the British industrial revolution. Accounting and Business History 32, no. 3: 133-52.
22. Fleischman, R.K., and D. Oldroyd. 2001. An imperial connection? Contrasting accounting practices in the coal mines of northeast England and Nova Scotia. Accounting Historians Journal 28, no. 2: 31-62.
23. Floyd, S.W., D.M. Schroeder, and D.M. Finn. 1994. Only if I'm first author: conflict over credit in management scholarship. Academy of Management Journal 37, no. 3: 734-47.
24. Heck, J.L., and J.C. Hwang. 1987. Peer assessment versus citation analysis of contributions to the accounting literature. Advances in Accounting 5: 153-62.
25. Holder, M.E., F.W. Langrehr, and D.M. Schroeder. 2000. Financial journal co-authorship: how do co-authors in very select journals value the experience? Financial Practice and Education 10, no. 2: 142-52.
26. Hopper, T.M., and P. Armstrong. 1991. Cost accounting, controlling labour and the rise of conglomerates. Accounting, Organizations and Society 16, no. 5/6: 405-38.
27. Hoskin, K.W., and R.H. Macve. 1986. Accounting and the examination: a genealogy of disciplinary power. Accounting, Organizations and Society 11, no. 2: 105-36.
28. Hudson, J. 1996. Trends in multi-authored papers in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10, no. 3: 153-8.
29. Johnson, H.T., and R.S. Kaplan. 1987. Relevance lost: the rise and fall of management accounting. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
30. Jones, M.J., and R. Roberts. 2005. International publishing patters: an investigation of leading UK and US accounting and finance journals. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 32, no. 5/6: 1107-40.
31. Manton, E.J., and D.E. English. 2007. The trend toward multiple authorship in business journals. Journal of Education for Business 82, no. 3: 164-8.
32. Maske, K.L., G.C. Durden, and P.E. Gaynor. 2003. Determinants of scholarly productivity among male and female economists. Economic Inquiry 41, no. 4: 555-64.
33. Miller, P., and T. O'Leary. 1987. Accounting and the construction of the governable person. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12, no. 3: 235-65.
34. Nathan, S., D.R. Hermanson, and R.H. Hermanson. 1998. Co-authoring in refereed journals: views of accounting faculty and department chairs. Issues in Accounting Education 13, no. 1: 79-92.
35. Richardson, A.J. 2008. Co-authorship in accounting history research: an historical appraisal. Working paper.
36. Schinski, M., A. Kugler, and W. Wick. 1998. Perceptions of the academic finance profession regarding publishing and the allocation of credit in co-authorship situations. Financial Practice and Education 8, no. 1: 60-7.
37. Schroeder, D.M., F.W. Langrehr, and S.M. Floyd. 1995. Marketing journal co-authorship: is it a hit or a miss with co-authors? Journal of Marketing Education 17, no. 2: 45-58.
38. Tompkins, J.G., S. Nathan, R.H. Hermanson, and D.R. Hermanson. 1997. Co-authoring in refereed journals: perceptions of finance faculty and department chairs. Financial Practice and Education 7, no. 2: 47-57.
39. Urbancic, F.R. 1992. The extent of collaboration in the production of accounting research. Accounting Educators'Journal 6, no. 1: 54-64.
40. Zan, L. 2004. Writing accounting and management history. Insights from unorthodox music historiography. Accounting Historians Journal 31, no. 2: 71-92.