Co-occurrence and the effect of inflectional paradigms

Lingue e Linguaggio

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 247-262

  Moscoso Del Prado Martín, Fermín ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 74849112995     PISSN: 17209331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1418/25653     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Aylett, M. (1999). Modelling clarity change in spontaneous speech. In Baddeley, P., J. B. Hancock, and P. Foldiák (eds.) Information Theory and the Brain. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Azuma, T. & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Why safe is better than fast: The relatedness of a word's meaning affects lexical decision times. «Journal of Memory and Language» 36, 484-504.
4. Baayen, R. H. (2005). Data mining at the intersection of psychology and linguistics. In A. Cutler (ed.) Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Baayen, R. H., Feldman, L. B., Schreuder, R., (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. «Journal of Memory and Language» 55, 290-313.
6. Baayen, R. H. & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2005). Semantic density and pasttense formation in three Germanic languages. «Language» 81(3), 666-698.
7. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. & Gulikers, L. (1995), The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
8. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B. & Treiman, R. (2002), The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 english words and nonwords.. Washington University, St. Louis, MO. URL: http://elexicon.wustl.edu/
9. Boroditsky, L. & Ramscar, M. (2003), Guilt by association: Gleaning meaning from contextual co-occurrence. Manuscript, Stanford University.
10. Borowsky, R. & Masson, M. E. J. (1996), Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. «Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition» 22, 63-85.
11. Colé, P., Beauvillain, C. & Segui, J. (1989), On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect, «Journal of Memory and Language» 28, 1-13
12. Dijkstra, A., Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Schulpen, B., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). A roommate in cream: Morphological family size effects in bilinguals. «Language and Cognitive Processes» 20(1), 7-41.
13. Filipović-Durdević, D. (2007). The polysemy effect in processing of Serbian nouns. PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
14. Jastrzembski, J. (1981). Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon, «Cognitive Psychology»13, 278-305.
15. Kanerva, P., Kristofersson, J. & Holst, A. (2000). Random indexing of text samples for Latent Semantic Analysis. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Josh, eds, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Kellas, G., Ferraro, F. R. & Simpson, G. B. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition. «Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance» 14, 601-609.
17. Landauer, T. & Dumais, S. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. «Psychological Review» 104(2), 211-240.
18. Landauer, T., Laham, D., Rehder, B. & Schreiner, M. (1997). How well can passage meaning be derived without using word order? A comparison of latent semantic analysis and humans. In Proceedings of 19th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Mawhwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 412-417.
19. Lowe, W. & McDonald, S. (2000). The direct route: Mediated priming in semantic space. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
20. Lund, K. & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. «Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers » 28(2), 203-208.
21. Lund, K., Burgess, C. & Atchley, R. A. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in high-dimensional semantic space. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 660-665.
22. McDonald, S. & Ramscar, M. (2001), Testing the distributional hypothesis: The influence of context judgements of semantic similarity, in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
23. McDonald, S. & Shillcock, R. (2001). Rethinking the word frequency effect: The neglected role of distributional information in lexical processing. «Language and Speech» 44, 295-323.
24. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Bertram, R., Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R.H. (2004). Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared to Dutch and Hebrew. «Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition» 30, 1271-1278.
25. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Schreuder, R., de Jong, N.H. & Baayen, R.H. (2005). Changing places: A cross-language perspective of the role of morphology in the processing of Hebrew and Dutch. «Journal of Memory and Language» 53, 496-512.
26. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostić, A. & Baayen, R.H. (2004). Putting the bits together: An information-theoretical perspective on morphological processing. «Cognition » 94(1), 1-18.
27. Oja, E. (1982), A simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer, «Journal of Mathematical Biology» 15, 267-273.
28. Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain's language. «Behavioral and Brain Sciences » 22, 253-336.
29. Rodd, J., Gaskell, M. G. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: semantic competition and lexical access. «Journal of Memory and Language» 46, 245-266.
30. Schone, P. & Jurafsky, D. (2001). Knowledge free induction of inflectional morphologies. In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL 2001.
31. Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. «Journal of Memory and Language» 37, 118-139.
32. Schütze, H. (1992). Dimensions of meaning. In Proceedings of Supercomputing '92, 787-796.
33. Schütze, H. (1994). Towards connectionist lexical semantics. In S. D. Lima, R. L. Corrigan & G. K. Iverson (eds.) The Reality of Linguistic Rules, Vol. 26 of Studies in Language Companion Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 171-191.
34. Schütze, H. (1995). Distributional part-of-speech tagging. In EACL 7, 251-258.
35. Schütze, H. & Pedersen, J. O. (1997). A cooccurrence-based thesaurus and two applications to information retrieval. «Information Processing & Management» 33(3), 307-318.
36. Seidenberg, M. S. & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. «Trends in Cognitive Sciences» 4(9), 353-361
37. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. «Bell Systems Technical Journal» 27, 379-423.
38. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. «Memory and Cognition» 7, 263-272.