The influence of only and even on online semantic interpretation

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 678-683

  Filik, Ruth ^a   Paterson, Kevin B ^b   Liversedge, Simon P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 74849109853     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.678     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bennett, J. (1982). Even if. Linguistics & Philosophy, 5, 403-418.
2. Fauconnier, G. (1975). Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 6, 353-375.
3. Filik, R. (2008). Contextual override of pragmatic anomalies: Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 106, 1038-1046. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.006
4. Filik, R., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Parsing with focus particles in context: Eye movements during the processing of relative clause ambiguities. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 473-495. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.07.004
5. Francescotti, R. M. (1995). Even: The conventional implicature approach reconsidered. Linguistics & Philosophy, 18, 153-173.
6. Giannakidou, A. (2007). The landscape of EVEN. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25, 39-81. doi:10.1007/s11049-006-9006-5
7. Horn, L. R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
8. Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Kartunnen, L., & Peters, S. (1979). Conventional implicatures. In C. Oh & D. Dinneen (Eds.), Syntax and semantics II: Presuppositions (pp. 1-56). New York: Academic Press.
10. Kay, P. (1990). Even. Linguistics & Philosophy, 13, 59-111.
11. König, E. (1991). The meaning of focus particles. London: Routledge.
12. Liversedge, S. P., Paterson, K. B., & Clayes, E. L. (2002). The influence of "only" on syntactic processing of "long" relative clause sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 225-240. doi:10.1080/02724980143000253
13. Liversedge, S. P., Paterson, K. B., & Pickering, M. J. (1998). Eye movements and measures of reading time. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 55-75). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
14. Lycan, W. (1991). Even and even if. Linguistics & Philosophy, 14, 115-150.
15. Mitchell, D. C., Shen, X., Green, M. J., & Hodgson, T. L. (2008). Accounting for regressive eye-movements in models of sentence processing: A reappraisal of the selective reanalysis hypothesis. Journal of Memory & Language, 59, 266-293. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.002
16. Moxey, L. M., Filik, R., & Paterson, K. B. (2009). On line effects of what is expected on the resolution of plural pronouns. Language & Cognitive Processes, 24, 843-875. doi:10.1080/01690960802634038
17. Ni, W., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1996). Sidestepping garden paths: The contribution of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities. Language & Cognitive Processes, 11, 283-334. doi:10.1080/016909696387196
18. Ni, W., Fodor, J. D., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. P. (1998). Anomalous strings: Eye-movement patterns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 515-539.
19. Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., Filik, R., Juhasz, B. J., White, S. J., & Rayner, K. (2007). Processing contrastive focus during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1423-1445. doi:10.1080/17470210601100563
20. Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., Rowland, C., & Filik, R. (2003). Children's comprehension of sentences with focus particles. Cognition, 89, 263-294. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00126-4
21. Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., & Underwood, G. (1999). The influence of focus operators on syntactic processing of "short" relative clause sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 717-737 doi:10.1080/027249899391025
22. Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation time in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191-201.
23. Rayner, K., Warren, T., Juhasz, B. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 1290-1301. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1290
24. Rooth, M. (1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75-116.
25. Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Invoking discourse-based sets and resolving syntactic ambiguities. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 341-370. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2812
26. Staub, A., Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Majewski, H. (2007). The time course of plausibility effects on eye movements in reading: Evidence from noun-noun compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 1162-1169. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1162
27. Warren, T., & McConnell, K. (2007). Investigating effects of selectional restriction violations and plausibility violation severity on eyemovements in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 770-775.