Focus identification during sentence comprehension: Evidence from eye movements

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 60, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1423-1445

  Paterson, Kevin B ^a   Liversedge, Simon P ^b   Filik, Ruth ^c   Juhasz, Barbara J ^d   White, Sarah J ^a   Rayner, Keith ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^d WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; READING; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ATTENTION; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; READING; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 34548585576     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210601100563     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Birch, S., & Clifton, C. (1995). Focus, accent, and argument structure: Effects on language comprehension. Language and Speech, 38, 365-391.
2. Birch, S., & Clifton, C. (2002). Effects of varying focus and accenting of adjuncts on the comprehension of utterances. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 571-588.
3. Bock, J. K., & Mazzella, J. R. (1983). Intonational marking of given and new information: Some consequences for comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 11, 64-76.
4. Bouma, G., Hendriks, P., & Hoeksema, J. (in press). Focus particles inside prepositional phrases: A comparison of Dutch, English and German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics.
5. Carlson, K. (2004, September). Only in context. Paper presented at the Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing conference, Aix-en-Provence, France.
6. Carlson, K., Frazier, L., Clifton, C., & Dickey, M. W. (2005, March). How contrastive is contrastive focus? Paper presented at the 18th Annual CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, Tucson, AZ.
7. Chafe, W. (1976). Giveness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 225-255). New York: Academic Press.
8. Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and philosophy (pp. 183-216). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
10. Clifton, C., Bock, J., & Rado, J. (2000). Effects of the focus particle only and intrinsic contrast on comprehension of reduced relative clauses. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11. Crain, S., Ni, W., & Conway, L. (1994). Learning, parsing and modularity. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Cutler, A., & Fodor, J. A. (1979). Semantic focus and sentence comprehension. Cognition, 7, 49-59.
13. Filik, R., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Parsing with focus particles in context: Evidence from eye movements in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 473-495.
14. Fodor, J. D. (2002). Prosodic disambiguation in silent reading. In M. Hirotani (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 32. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.
15. Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
16. Gennari, S. Meroni, L., & Crain, S. (2004). Rapid relief of stress in dealing with ambiguity. In J. C. Trueswell & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 199-244.
18. Hornby, P. A. (1974). Surface structure and presupposition. Journal of Verbal Leaning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 530-538.
19. Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic interpretation ingenerative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Kadmon, N. (2001). Formal pragmatics. London: Blackwell.
21. Kiss, K. É. (1998). Identificational focus versus information focus. Language, 74, 245-273.
22. Konieczny, L., Hemforth, B., Scheepers, C., & Strube, G. (1997). The role of lexical heads in parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 307-348.
23. König, E. (1991). The meaning of focus particles. London: Routledge.
24. Krifka, M. (1992). A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Informationsstruktur und Grammatik. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
25. Liversedge, S. P., & Findlay, J. M. (2000). Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 6-14.
26. Liversedge, S. P., Paterson, K. B., & Clayes, E. (2002). The influence of "only" on syntactic processing of "long" reduced relative clause sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 225-241.
27. Liversedge, S. P., Paterson, K. B., & Pickering, M. J. (1998). Eye movements and measures of reading time. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
28. Malt, B. (1985). The role of discourse structure in understanding anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 271-289.
29. Ni, W., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1996). Sidestepping garden paths: The contribution of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 283-334.
30. Noteboom, S. G., & Kruyt, J. G. (1987). Accent, focus distribution, and perceived distribution of given and new information: An experiment. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 82, 1512-1524.
31. Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., Rowland, C., & Filik, R. (2003). Children's comprehension of sentences with focus particles. Cognition, 89, 263-294.
32. Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., & Underwood, G. (1999). The influence of focus operators on syntactic processing of "short" reduced relative clause sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 717-737.
33. Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., White, D., Filik, R., & Jaz, K. (2006). Children's interpretations of ambiguous sentences with "only". Language Acquisition, 13, 253-284.
34. Philip, W., & Lynch, E. (1999). Felicity, relevance, and acquisition of the grammar of every and only. In S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
35. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with "the language-as-fixed-effects-fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416-426.