A neural network based urban growth model of an Indian city

Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 363-376

  Maithani, S ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF REMOTE SENSING   (India)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Kappa; Multilayer perceptron; Spatial metrics; Spatial urban growth; Urban growth potential

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CALIBRATION; GIS; REMOTE SENSING; SIMULATION; URBAN GROWTH;

INDIA; SAHARANPUR; UTTAR PRADESH;

EID: 74849107222     PISSN: 0255660X     EISSN: 09743006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-009-0041-7     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arora MK, Narsimham G and Mohanty B (1998) Neural network approach for the classification of remotely sensed data. Asian Pacific Remote Sensing and GIS Journal 10(2): 11-18.
2. Arora MK, Das Gupta AS and Gupta RP (2004) An artificial neural netwok approach for landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) valley, Himalayas. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25: 559-572.
3. Atkinson PM and Tatnall ARL (1997) Neural networks in remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18(4): 699-709.
4. Barredo JI, Kasanko M, McCormick N and Lavalle C (2003) Modeling dynamic spatial process: simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning 64: 145-160.
5. Barredo JI, Demicheli L, Lavalle C, Kasanko M and McCormick N (2004) Modeling future urban scenarios in developing countries: an application case study in Lagos, Nigeria. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32: 65-84.
6. Census of India, 2001 (New Delhi: Government of India).
7. Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 37: 35-46.
8. Demuth H and Beale M (2003) Neural networks toolbox: User guide, version 4. The Mathworks, Inc., USA.
9. Fazal S (2000) Urban expansion and loss of agricultural land - a GIS based study of Saharanpur city, India. Environment & Urbanization 12(2): 133-149.
10. Foody GM and Arora MK (1997) An evaluation of some factors affecting the accuracy of classification by an artificial network. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(4): 799-810.
11. Gowda K (1998) Forces of urban form, In International Symposium on Changing Environmental Scenario in South Asia During the Past Five Decades, 20-22 December 1998, Calcutta.
12. Gowda K and Sridhara MV (2000) Sustainable city: experiences and perspectives. In International Conference on urbanisation and housing 2000, Bangalore.
13. GGIM, Good governance India magazine, available online at: www.infochangeindia.org (accessed on 4 April 2005).
14. Gupta JK and Bawa P (2004) Selecting sites for urban development projects. Spatio-Economic Development Record 11(3): 29-33.
15. Hagan MT and Menhaj M (1994) Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 5(6): 989-993.
16. Haykin S (1999) Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
17. Hecht-Nielsen R (1987) Kolmogorov's mapping neural network existence theorem. In Proceedings of the first IEEE International conference on neural networks. 21-24 June 1987, San Diego, CA.
18. Hush DR (1989) Classification with neural networks: a performance analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE International conference on systems engineering, Ohio, USA, pp 277-280.
19. Kanellopoulos I and Wilkinson GG (1997) Strategies and best practice for neural network image classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18(4): 711-725.
20. Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarkar S and Gupta RP (2006) A comparative study of conventional ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas. Engineering Geology 85: 347-366.
21. Kavzoglu T and Mather PM (2003) The use of back propagation artificial neural networks in land cover classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24: 4097-4938.
22. rd National Town & Country Planners Congress, 27-29 December 2004, Indore, pp 177-181.
23. th National Town & Country Planners Congress, 9-11 January 2007, Kerala, pp 5-11.
24. th National Town & Country Planners Congress, 20-22 December 2007, Kolkata, pp 31-37.
25. Kumar S (2004) Neural Networks: A Classroom Approach. (New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hall).
26. Lillesand TM and Kiefer RW (2000) Remote sensing and image interpretation New York: John Wiley & Sons.
27. Paola JD (1994) Neural network classification of multispectral imagery. MSc thesis, The University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
28. st century (concepts & systems), 2-4 October 1997, Roorkee, pp 257-265.
29. Pijanowski BC, Shellito BA, Pithadia S and Alexandridis, K (2002b) Forecasting and assessing the impact of urban sprawl in coastal watersheds along eastern lake Michigan. Lakes & Reservoirs: Research and Management 7: 189-199.
30. Pijanowski BC, Pithadia S, Shellito BA and Alexandridis, K (2005) Calibrating a neural network-based urban change model for two metropolitan areas of the Upper Midwest of the United States. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19(2): 197-215.
31. Ripley BD (1993) Statistical aspects of neural networks. In Networks and Chaos -Statistical and Probabilistic Aspects, Barndorff-Nielsen OE, Jensen JL and Kendall WS (Eds), pp 40-123 London: Chapman & Hall.
32. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE and Williams (1986) Learning representatons by Back-propogating errors. Nature 23: 533-536.
33. Sivanandam SN, Sumathi S and Deepa SN (2006) Introduction to neural networks using Matlab 6.0 New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
34. Subudhi AP (1998) Monitoring and mapping: Urban growth and changing land use pattern in and around Saharanpur city. Ph. D thesis, Ch. Charan Singh University, Meerut, India.
35. st century (concepts & systems), 2-4 October 1997, Roorkee, pp 77-86.
36. Wang F (1994) The use of artificial neural networks in geographical information system for agricultural land-suitability assessment. Environment and Planning A, 26: 265-284.
37. Ward DP, Murray AT and Phinn SR (2000) A stochastically constrained cellular model of urban growth. Computers, Environment and Urban Studies 24: 539-558.
38. White R and Engelen G (1993) Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modeling approach to the evolution of urban land use patterns. Environment and Planning A 25: 1175-1199.
39. White R and Engelen G (1994) Cellular dynamics and GIS: modeling spatial complexity. Geographical Systems 1: 237-253.
40. White R and Engelen G (1997) Cellular automata as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modeling. Environment and Planning B 24: 235-246.
41. Wu F (1998a) An empirical model of intrametropolitan land use changes in a Chinese city. Environment and Planning B 25: 245-263.
42. Wu F (1998b) Simland: A prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and CA with AHP-derived transition rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12: 63-82.
43. Wu F (1999) GIS-based simulation as an exploratory analysis for space-time processes. The Journal of Geographical Systems 1(3): 199-218.
44. Wu F (2002) Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: the application to rural-urban land conversions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 16(8): 795-818.
45. Wu F and Webster C (1998) Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation. Environment and Planning B 25: 103-126.
46. Wu F and Webster C J (2000) Simulation of artificial cities in a GIS environment: urban growth under alternative regulation regime. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14(7): 625-648.