Does the ignorance hypothesis undermine the conceivability and knowledge arguments?

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 756-765

  Alter, Torin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 74849097482     PISSN: 00318205     EISSN: 19331592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00303.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Chalmers, D. J. 2003. Consciousness and its Place in Nature. In S. Stich T. Warfield (eds The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford : Blackwell. Reprinted in his Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings: 247-72. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
2. Chalmers, D. J. 2002. Does Conceivability Entail Possibility? In T. Gendler J. Hawthorne (eds Conceivability and Possibility. New York : Oxford University Press : 145 200.
3. Chalmers, D. J. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York : Oxford University Press.
4. Kripke, S. 1972. Naming and Necessity. In G. Harman D. Davidson (eds The Semantics of Natural Language, Dordrecht : Reidel : 253 355, 763 769.
5. Stoljar, D. 2006. Ignorance and Imagination: The Epistemic Origin of the Problem of Consciousness. New York : Oxford University Press.
6. Yablo, S. 2000. Textbook Kripkeanism and the Open Texture of Concepts. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 : 98 122.