Supracricoid partial laryngectomy: Swallowing, voice, and speech outcomes

Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

Volumn 119, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 10-16

  Webster, Kimberly T ^a   Samlan, Robin A ^a   Jones, Bronwyn ^b   Bunton, Kate ^c   Tufano, Ralph P ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional outcome; Supracricoid laryngectomy; Swallowing; Voice

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION; BREATH HOLDING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIET; EXAMINATION; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; FOOD; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX CARCINOMA; MALE; NOSE AIRFLOW; PERCEPTION; PHONATION; PILOT STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; STOMACH TUBE; STROBOSCOPY; SUPRACRICOID PARTIAL LARYNGECTOMY; SWALLOWING; TUBE REMOVAL; VIBRATION; VOICE;

EID: 74849092247     PISSN: 00034894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000348941011900102     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Laccourreye H, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Menard M, Brasnu D. Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy: a partial laryngeal procedure for glottic carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99:421-6.
2. Laccourreye H, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Menard M, Brasnu D. Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy: a partial laryngeal procedure for selected supraglottic and transglottic carcinomas. Laryngoscope 1990;100:735-41.
3. Naudo P, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Jouffre V, Laccourreye H, Brasnu D. Complications and functional outcome after supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;118:124-9.
4. Naudo P, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Hans S, Laccourreye H, Brasnu D. Functional outcome and prognosis factors after supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997;106:291-6.
5. Woisard V, Puech M, Yardeni E, Serrano E, Pessey JJ. De glutition after supracricoid laryngectomy: compensatory mech anisms and sequelae. Dysphagia 1996;11:265-9.
6. Marioni G, Marchese-Ragona R, Ottaviano G, Staffieri A. Supracricoid laryngectomy: is it time to define guidelines to evaluate functional results? A review. Am J Otolaryngol 2004; 25:98-104.
7. Yücetürk AV, Tarhan S, Günhan K, Pabuşçu Y. Videofluoroscopic evaluation of the swallowing function after supracricoid laryngectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005;262:198-203
8. Dworkin JP, Meleca RJ, Zacharek MA, et al. Voice and deglutition functions after the supracricoid and total laryngectomy procedures for advanced stage laryngeal carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:311-20.
9. Lewin JS, Hutcheson KA, Barringer DA, et al. Functional analysis of swallowing outcomes after supracricoid partial laryngectomy. Head Neck 2008;30:559-66.
10. Makeieff M, Barbotte E, Giovanni A, Guerrier B. Acoustic and aerodynamic measurement of speech production after supracricoid partial laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 2005;115:546-51.
11. Schindler A, Favero E, Nudo S, Spadola-Bisetti M, Ottaviani F, Schindler O. Voice after supracricoid laryngectomy: sub jective, objective and self-assessment data. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2005;30:114-9.
12. Yücetürk AV, Günhan K. Multidimensional assessment of voice and speech after supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:7791-5.
13. Laccourreye O, Crevier-Buchmann L, Weinstein G, Biacabe B, Laccourreye H, Brasnu D. Duration and frequency characteristics of speech and voice following supracricoid partial lar yngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995;104:516-21.
14. Tufano RP. Organ preservation surgery for laryngeal cancer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2002;35:1067-80.
15. Ruiz C, Crevier-Buchman L. Swallowing rehabilitation following organ preservation surgery. In: Weinstein GS, Laccour reye O, Brasnu D, et al, eds. Organ preservation surgery for laryngeal cancer. San Diego, Calif: Singular Publishing Group, 2000:165-70.
16. McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, et al. The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia 2002;17:97-114.
17. Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, et al. The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1997;6:66-70.
18. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Special Interest Division 3, Voice and Voice Disorders: Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), 2003: In strument in preparation. Available at http://www.asha.org/ about/membership-certification/divs/div-3.htm. Accessed December 20, 2007.
19. Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.0.32) [computer program]. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://www.praat.org/.
20. Titze IR. Workshop on acoustic voice analysis: summary statement. Iowa City, Iowa: National Center for Voice and Speech, 1995.
21. Zacharek MA, Pasha R, Meleca RJ, et al. Functional outcomes after supracricoid laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 2001; 111:1558-64.
22. Weinstein GS, Laccourreye O, Ruiz C, Dooley P, Chalian A, Mirza N. Larynx preservation with supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy. Correlation of videostroboscopic findings and voice parameters. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002;111:1-7