Acoustic and aerodynamic measurement of speech production after supracricoid partial laryngectomy

Laryngoscope

Volumn 115, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 546-551

  Makeieff, Marc ^a,b   Barbotte, Eric ^c   Giovanni, Antoine ^b   Guerrier, Bernard ^a  

^a GUI DE CHAULIAC HOSPITAL   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

Dysphonia; Multiparametric analysis; Supracricoid partial laryngectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; ASTHENIA; BREATHING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRICOID; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; GLOTTIS; HUMAN; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX CARTILAGE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVOUSNESS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHONATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH ANALYSIS; VOCAL CORD; VOICE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; LARYNGECTOMY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; SPEECH, ALARYNGEAL; VOCAL CORDS; VOICE DISORDERS; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 14744273919     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000157848.78530.ee     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Giovanni A, Estublier N, Robert D, et al. Objective evaluation of dysphonia: preliminary results of a device allowing simultaneous acoustic and aerodynamic measurements. Folia Phoniatr Logop 1996;48:174-185.
2. Yu P, Ouaknine M, Revis J, Giovanni A. Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: a multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements. J Voice 2001;15:529-542.
3. Giovanni A, Heim C, Demolin D, Triglia JM. Estimated sub-glottic pressure in normal and dysphonic subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109:500-504.
4. De Bolt M, Wuysts F. Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J Voice 1997;11:74-80.
5. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Interpretation of coefficients. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1989;38-81.
6. Zacharek MA, Pasha R, Meleca RJ, et al. Functional outcomes after supracricoid laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1558-564.
7. Laccourreye O, Crevier-Buchmann L, Weinstein G, et al. Duration and frequency characteristics of speech and voice following supracricoid partial laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995;104:516-521.
8. Dworkin JP, Meleca RJ, ZAcharek MA, et al. Voice and deglutition functions after the supracricoid and total laryngectomy procedure for advanced stage laryngeal carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:311-320.
9. Wolfe V, Fitch J, Cornell R. Acoustic prediction of severity in commonly occurring voice problems. J Speech Hear Res 1995;38:273-279.
10. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Kempster GB, et al. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial and a framework for future research. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:21-40.
11. Piccirillo J, Colin P, Dennis F. Assessment of two objective voice function indices. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;107:396-400.
12. Wuyts FL, De Bolt M, Molenberghs G, et al. The dysphonia severity index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparametric approach. J Speech Hear Res 2000;43:796-809.
13. Dejonckere P, Obbens C. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance. Folia Phoniatr 1993;45:76-83.
14. De Krom G. A cepstrum-based technique for determining a harmonic-to-noise ratio in speech signals. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:254-266.
15. Schoentgen J. Stochastic models of jitter. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;109:1631-1650.