The AsTex ®: CCClinimetric properties of a new tool for evaluating hand sensation following stroke

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1104-1115

  Miller, K J ^a   Phillips, B A ^b   Martin, C L ^a   Wheat, H E ^a   Goodwin, A W ^a   Galea, M P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOMATOSENSORY DISORDER; STROKE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOMATOSENSORY DISORDERS; STROKE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74849090842     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: 14770873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215509342331     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Harris JE, Eng JJ Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. Phys Ther 2007 ; 87: 88-97.
2. Varney NR Somesthesis. In Hannay HJ ed. Experimental techniques in human neuropsychology. New York, Sage, 1986, 212-237.
3. Lincoln NB, Crow JL, Jackson JM, Waters GR, Adams SA, Hodgson P. The unreliability of sensory assessments. Clin Rehabil 1991 ; 5: 273-282.
4. Bell-Krotoski J. Light touch-deep pressure testing using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. In Hunter JM, Schneider LH, Mackin EJ, Callahan AD eds. Rehabilitation of the hand., third edition. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1990: 585-593.
5. Carey LM, Oke LE, Matyas TA Impaired touch discrimination after stroke: a quantitative test. J Neurol Rehabil 1997 ; 11: 219-232.
6. Williams PS, Basso DM, Case-Smith J., Nichols-Larsen DS Development of the Hand Active Sensation Test: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006 ; 87: 1471-1477.
7. Dannenbaum RM, Michaelsen SM, Desrosiers J., Levine MF Development and validation of two new sensory tests of the hand for patients with stroke. Clin Rehabil 2002 ; 16: 630-639.
8. Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT The Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance (RASP): standardization and reliability data. Clin Rehabil 2002 ; 16: 523-533.
9. Kim JS, Choi-Kwon S. Discriminative sensory dysfunction after unilateral stroke. Stroke 1996 ; 27: 677-682.
10. Johansson RS, Cole KJ Sensory-motor coordination during grasping and manipulative actions. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1992 ; 2: 815-823.
11. Blennerhassett JM, Matyas TA, Carey LM Impaired discrimination of surface friction contributes to pinch grip deficit after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007 ; 21: 263-272.
12. Harris M., Horvitz DG, Mood AM On determination of sample sizes in designing experiments. J Am Stat Assoc 1948 ; 43: 391-402.
13. Bryden MP Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia 1977 ; 15: 617-624.
14. Stratford PW, Goldsmith CH Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Phys Ther 1997 ; 77: 745-750.
15. Eliasziw M., Young SL, Woodbury MG, Fryday-Field K. Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther 1994 ; 74: 777-788.
16. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990 ; 28: 632-642.
17. Gowland C., Stratford P., Ward M. et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 1993 ; 24: 58-63. (Pubitemid 23014383)
18. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L., Lynn D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 1985 ; 65: 175-179.
19. Durand A., Malouin F., Richards CL, Bravo G. Intertrial reliability of work measurements recorded during concentric isokinetic knee extension and flexion in subjects with and without meniscal tears. Phys Ther 1991 ; 71: 804-812.
20. Lederman SJ Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: the touching process and effects of macro- and microsurface structure. Percept Psychophys 1974 ; 16: 386-395.
21. Lederman SJ, Taylor MM Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touch. Percept Psychophys 1972 ; 12: 401-408.
22. Morley JW, Goodwin AW, Darian-Smith I. Tactile discrimination of gratings. Exp Brain Res 1983 ; 49: 291-299.
23. Darian-Smith I., Oke LE Peripheral neural representation of the spatial frequency of a grating moving across the monkey?s finger pad. J Physiol 1980 ; 309: 117-133. (Pubitemid 11199930)
24. Lamb GD Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: psychophysical performance measurements in humans. J Physiol 1983 ; 338: 551-565.
25. Andresen EM, Rothenberg BM, Panzer R., Katz P., McDermott MP Selecting a generic measure of health-related quality of life for use among older adults: a comparison of candidate instruments. Eval Health Prof 1998 ; 21: 244-264.
26. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995 ; 4: 293-307.
27. Julkunen L., Tenovuo O., Jaaskelainen SK, Hamalainen H. Recovery of somatosensory deficits in acute stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2005 ; 111: 366-372.