Development and validation of two new sensory tests of the hand for patients with stroke

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 630-639

  Dannenbaum, Ruth M ^a   Michaelsen, Stella M ^a   Desrosiers, Johanne ^b   Levin, Mindy F ^a  

^a Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF GERIATRICS OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; FEMALE; HAND FUNCTION; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; MALE; OUTPATIENT CARE; PRESSURE; RELIABILITY; SENSATION; SENSORY EVALUATION; STANDARD; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0036745616     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr532oa     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Galski T, Bruno RL, Zorowitz R, Walker A. Predicting length of stay, functional outcome, and aftercare in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. Stroke 1993; 24: 1794-800.
2. Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT. Current practise and clinical relevance of somatosensory assessment after stroke. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 48-55.
3. Lincoln NB, Jackson JM, Adams SA. Reliability and revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1998; 84: 358-65.
4. Bassetti C, Bogousslavsky J, Regli F. Sensory syndromes in parietal stroke. Neurology 1993; 43: 1942-49.
5. Carey LM, Matyas TA, Oke LE. Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training in tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 602-11.
6. Johansson RS, Cole KJ. Sensory-motor coordination during grasping and manipulative actions. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1992; 2: 815-23.
7. Kunesch E, Binkofski F, Steinmetz H, Freund H. The pattern of motor deficits in relation to the site of stroke lesions. Eur Neurol 1995; 35: 20-26.
8. Bell-Krotowski J, Tomancik E. The repeatability of testing with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Surg 1987; 12A: 155-61.
9. Saddiki-Traki F, Tremblay N, Dykes RW, Derraz S, El-Khamlichi A. Differences between the tactile sensitivity on the anterior torso of normal individuals and those having suffered complete transection of the spinal cord. Somatosens Mot Res 1999; 16: 263-73.
10. Dannenbaum RM, Dykes RW. Evaluating sustained touch-pressure in severe sensory deficits: meeting an unanswered need. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 455-59.
11. Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 1993; 24: 58-63.
12. Dellon AL. Evaluation of sensibility and re-education of sensation of the hand. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1981.
13. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1985; 36: 386-91.
14. Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Bravo G, Dutil E. Upper extremity performance test for the elderly (TEMPA): Normative data and correlates with sensorimotor parameters. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 1125-29.
15. Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Dutil E, Bravo G. Development and reliability of an upper extremity function test for the elderly: the TEMPA. Can J Occup Ther 1993; 60: 9-16.
16. Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Dutil E, Bravo G, Mercier L. Validity of a measurement instrument for upper extremity performance: the TEMPA. Occup Ther J Res 1994; 14: 267-81.
17. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
18. Van Boven RW, Johnson KO. A psychophysical study of the mechanisms of sensory recovery following nerve injury in humans. Brain 1994; 117: 149-67.
19. Johansson RS, Hager C, Backstrom L. Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. Exp Brain Res 1992; 89: 204-13.