Effect of clinical information on diagnostic performance in breast sonography

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1349-1356

  Baek, Song Ee ^a   Kim, Min Jung ^a   Kim, Eun Kyung ^a   Youk, Ji Hyun ^a   Lee, Hye Jeong ^a   Son, Eun Ju ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon; Breast sonography; Clinical information

Indexed keywords

BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; ULTRASONIC IMAGING; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGIES; BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEMS; BREAST SONOGRAPHY; CLINICAL INFORMATION; CLINICAL PRESENTATIONS; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; PATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL PRACTICE; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; KOREA; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KOREA; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74749104731     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2009.28.10.1349     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184:1260-1265.
2. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
3. Costantini M, Belli P, Lombardi R, Franceschini G, Mulè A, Bonomo L. Characterization of solid breast masses: use of the sonographic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25:649-659.
4. Paulinelli RR, Freitas-Júnior R, Moreira MA, et al. Risk of malignancy in solid breast nodules according to their sonographic features. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24:635-641.
5. Kurt Rossmann Laboratories for Radiologic Image Research website. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. http://wwwradiology.uchicago.edu/krl/KRL- ROC/software-index.htm. Accessed July 22, 2008.
6. Wagner RF, Metz CE, Campbell G. Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review. Acad Radiol 2007; 14:723-748.
7. Shin JH, Han BK, Ko EY, Choe YH, Nam SJ. Probably benign breast masses diagnosed by sonography: is there a difference in the cancer rate according to palpability? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192:W187-W191.
8. Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH, et al. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Radiology 2004; 233:850-856.
9. Kim SJ, Ko EY, Shin JH, et al. Application of sonographic BI-RADS to synchronous breast nodules detected in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 653-658.
10. Lee HJ, Kim EK, Kim MJ, et al. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound. Eur J Radiol 2008; 65:293-298.
11. Stavros AT. Introduction to breast ultrasound. In: Stavros AT (ed). Breast Ultrasound. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:850-856.