Assessment of left ventricular function in non-dilated and dilated hearts: Comparison of contrast-enhanced 2-dimensional echocardiography with multi-detector row CT angiography

Acta Cardiologica

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 787-794

  Burianová, Lucie ^a   Riedlbauchová, Lucie ^a   Lefflerová, Kateřina ^a   Marek, Tomáš ^a   Lupínek, Petr ^a   Kautznerová, Dana ^a   Vedlich, Daniel ^a   Lánská, Věra ^a   Kautzner, Josef ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

CT angiography; Echocardiography; Left ventricular function; Left ventricular volume

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONGESTIVE CARDIOMYOPATHY; CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; SYSTOLIC DYSFUNCTION; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIOMYOPATHY, DILATED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE VOLUME; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 74749100587     PISSN: 00015385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2143/AC.64.6.2044744     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. rd. Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation 1994; 90: 2645-57.
2. St John Sutton M, Pfeffer MA, Moye L, Plappert T, Rouleau JL, Lamas G, Rouleau J, Parker JO, Arnold MO, Sussex B, Braunwald E. Cardiovascular death and left ventricular remodeling two years after myocardial infarction: baseline predictors and impact of long-term use of Captopril: information from the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial. Circulation 1997; 96: 3294-9.
3. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Evans JC, Levy D. Left ventricular dilatation and the risk of congestive heart failure in people without myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1350-5.
4. Peshock RM, Willett DL, Sayad DE, Hundley WG, Chwialkowski MC, Clarke GD, Parkey RW. Quantitative MR imaging of the heart. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1996; 4: 287-305.
5. Rathi VK, Biederman RW Imaging of ventricular function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Curr Cardiol Rep 2004; 6: 55-61.
6. Alfakih K, Reid S, Jones T, Sivananthan M. Assessment of ventricular function and mass by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 1813-22.
7. Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, Fallenberg EM, Wichter T, Heindel W, Fischbach R. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2004; 230: 403-10.
8. Malm S, Frigstad S, Sagberg E, Larsson H, Skjaerpe T. Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1030-5.
9. Lim TK, Burden L, Janardhanan R, Ping C, Moon J, Pennell D, Senior R. Improved accuracy of low-power contrast echocardiography for the assessment of left ventricular remodeling compared with unenhanced harmonic echocardiography after acute myocardial infarction: comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 1203-7.
10. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, Solomon SD, Spencer KT, Sutton MS, Stewart WJ. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 1440-63.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135-60.
12. Salm LP, Schuijf JD, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, Vliegen HW, Jukema JW, Joemai R, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ. Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur J Echocardiogr 2006; 7: 308-14.
13. Bansal D, Singh RM, Sarkar M, Sureddi R, McBreen KC, Griffis T, Sinha A, Mehta JL. Assessment of left ventricular function: comparison of cardiac multidetector-row computed tomography with two-dimension standard echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular function. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 24: 327-9.
14. Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L, Niel J, Ebner C, Steringer-Mascherbauer R, Schmidt F, Galuschky C, Schummers G, Lang RM, Nesser HJ. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Circulation 2006; 114: 654-61.
15. Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, Holman ER, Lamb HJ, de Roos A, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function and volumes with 64-slice MSCT: a comparison with 2D echocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2006; 13: 480-7.
16. Hong C, Becker CR, Huber A, Schoepf UJ, Ohnesorge B, Knez A, Bruning R, Reiser MF. ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. Radiology 2001; 220: 712-7.
17. Hosoi S, Mochizuki T, Miyagawa M, Shen Y, Murase K, Ikezoe J. Assessment of left ventricular volumes using multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT): phantom and human studies. Radiat Med 2003; 21: 62-7.
18. Mahnken AH, Spuentrup E, Niethammer M, Buecker A, Boese J, Wildberger JE, Flohr T, Sinha AM, Krombach GA, Gunther RW Quantitative and qualitative assessment of left ventricular volume with ECG-gated multislice spiral CT: value of different image reconstruction algorithms in comparison to MRI. Acta Radiol 2003; 44: 604-11.
19. Schlosser T, Mohrs OK, Magedanz A, Voigtlander T, Schmermund A, Barkhausen J. Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using 64-detector-row CT: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol 2007; 48: 30-5.
20. Heuschmid M, Rothfuss JK, Schroeder S, Fenchel M, Stauder N, Burgstahler C, Franow A, Kuzo RS, Kuettner A, Miller S, Claussen CD, Kopp AF. Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 551-9.
21. Mahnken AH, Hohl C, Suess C, Bruder H, Muhlenbruch G, Das M, Gunther RW, Wildberger JE. Influence of heart rate and temporal resolution on left-ventricular volumes in cardiac multislice spiral computed tomography: a phantom study. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 429-35.
22. Grude M, Juergens KU, Wichter T, Paul M, Fallenberg EM, Muller JG, Heindel W, Breithardt G, Fischbach R. Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2003; 38: 653-61.
23. Schlosser T, Pagonidis K, Herborn CU, Hunold P, Waltering KU, Lauenstein TC, Barkhausen J. Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 765-73.
24. Rumberger JA, Behrenbeck T, Bell MR, Breen JF, Johnston DL, Holmes DR, Jr., Enriquez-Sarano M. Determination of ventricular ejection fraction: a comparison of available imaging methods. The Cardiovascular Imaging Working Group. Mayo Clin Proc 1997; 72: 860-70.
25. Hoffmann R, von Bardeleben S, ten Cate F, Borges AC, Kasprzak J, Firschke C, Lafitte S, Al-Saadi N, Kuntz-Hehner S, Engelhardt M, Becher H, Vanoverschelde JL. Assessment of systolic left ventricular function: a multi-centre comparison of cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 607-16.
26. Thomson HL, Basmadjian AJ, Rainbird AJ, Razavi M, Avierinos JF, Pellikka PA, Bailey KR, Breen JF, Enriquez-Sarano M. Contrast echocardiography improves the accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular remodeling measurements: a prospective, randomly assigned, blinded study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 867-75.
27. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Products. The EMEA page. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/press/pus/021204en.pdf
28. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The FDA Page. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/CDER/drug/infopage/microbubble/default.htm