Enhancing avifauna in commercial plantations: Research note

Conservation Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 319-324

  Nájera, Andrea ^a   Simonetti, Javier A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Agroforestry; Birds; Meta analysis; Structural complexity; Understory

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; AGROFORESTRY; AVIFAUNA; BIRD; BODY SIZE; COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY; DIET; META-ANALYSIS; NATIVE SPECIES; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; SPECIES RICHNESS; TAXONOMY; TREE PLANTING; UNDERSTORY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIRD; META ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TREE;

ANIMALS; BIRDS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TREES;

AVES;

EID: 74549215733     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01350.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aratrakorn, S., S. Thunhikorn, and P. F. Donald. 2006. Changes in bird communities following conversion of lowland forest to oil palm and rubber plantations in southern Thailand. Bird Conservation International 16 : 71 82.
2. Beukema, H., F. Danielsen, G. Vincent, S. Hardiwinoto, and J. van Andel. 2007. Plant and bird diversity in rubber agroforests in the lowlands of Sumatra, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems 70 : 217 242.
3. Cruz-Angon, A., and R. Greenberg. 2005. Are epiphytes important for birds in coffee plantations? An experimental assessment. Journal of Applied Ecology 42 : 150 159.
4. Daily, G. 2001. Ecological forecasts. Nature 411 : 245.
5. Daily, G., G. Ceballos, G. Pacheco, G. Suzan, and A. Sanchez-Azofeifa. 2003. Countryside biogeography of Neotropical mammals: conservation opportunities in agricultural landscapes of Costa Rica. Biological Conservation 17 : 1814 1826.
6. Donald, P. 2004. Biodiversity impacts of some agricultural commodity production systems. Conservation Biology 18 : 17 37.
7. Faria, D., R. Laps, J. Baumgarten, and M. Cetra. 2007. Bat and bird assemblages from forests and shade cacao plantations in two contrasting landscapes in the Atlantic Forest of southern Bahia, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 15 : 587 617.
8. Foley, J. A., et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309 : 570 574.
9. Grez, A. A., P. Moreno, and M. Elgueta. 2003. Coleopteros (Insecta: Coleoptera) epígeos asociados al bosque maulino y plantaciones de pino aledañas. Revista Chilena de Entomología 29 : 9 18.
10. Hartley, M. 2002. Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. Forest Ecology and Management 155 : 81 95.
11. Harvey, C., and J. A. González-Villalobos. 2007. Agroforestry systems conserve species-rich but modified assemblages of tropical birds and bats. Biodiversity Conservation 16 : 2257 2292.
12. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). 2007. Red List of threatened species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Available from http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed November 2008).
13. Koh, L. P., and D. Wilcove. 2008. Is oil palm really destroying biodiversity? Conservation Letters 1 : 60 64.
14. Koh, L. P. 2008a. Birds defend oil palm from herbivorous insects. Ecological Applications 18 : 821 825.
15. Koh, L. P. 2008b. Can oil palm be more hospitable for butterflies and birds? Journal of Applied Ecology 45 : 1002 1009.
16. Lindenmayer, D. B., and R. J. Hobbs. 2004. Fauna conservation in Australian plantation forests - a review. Biological Conservation 119 : 151 168.
17. Nájera, A. 2009. Conservación de avifauna en plantaciones comerciales. MS thesis. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago.
18. Owens, I. P. F., and P. M. Bennett. 2000. Ecological basis of extinction risk in birds: habitat loss versus human persecution and introduced predators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97 : 2144 12148.
19. Peh, K. S. H., N. S. Sodhi, J. de Jong, C. H. Sekercioglu, C. A. M. Yap, and S. L. H. Lim. 2006. Conservation value of degraded habitats for forest birds in southern peninsular Malaysia. Diversity and Distributions 12 : 572 581.
20. Peh, K. S. H., J. de Jong, N. S. Sodhi, S. L. H. Lim, and C. A. M. Yap. 2005. Lowland rainforest avifauna and human disturbance: persistence of primary forest birds in selectively logged forests and mixed-rural habitats of southern Peninsular Malaysia. Biological Conservation 123 : 489 505.
21. Rametsteiner, E., and M. Simula. 2003. Forest certification: an instrument to promote sustainable forest management? Journal of environmental management 67 : 87 98.
22. Rosenberg, M., D. C. Adams, and J. Gurevitch. 1997. MetaWin. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
23. Simonetti, J. A. 2006. Conservación de biodiversidad en ambientes fragmentados: el caso del bosque maulino. Pages 213 229 in A. A. Grez, J. A. Simonetti, and R. Bustamante, editors. Biodiversidad en ambientes fragmentados de Chile: patrones y procesos a diferentes escalas. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago.
24. Stephens, S. S., and M. R. Wagner. 2007. Forest plantations and biodiversity: a fresh perspective. Journal of Forestry 105 : 307 313.
25. Tews, J., U. Brose, V. Grimm, K. Tielbörger, M. C. Wichmann, M. Schwager, and F. Jeltsch. 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography 31 : 79 92.
26. Turner, E., J. Snaddon, T. M. Fayle, and W. Foser. 2008. Oil palm research in context. Public Library of Science ONE 3 : DOI :.
27. Tscharntke, T., C. H. Sekercioglu, T. V. Dietsch, N. S. Sodhi, P. Hoehn, and J. M. Tylianakis. 2008. Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems. Ecology 89 : 944 951.
28. Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
29. Zeddam, J., J. Arroyo, J. Luna, and M. Ravallec. 2003. A new nucleopolyhedrovirus from the oil-palm leaf-eater Euprosterna elaeasa (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae): preliminary characterization and field assessment in Peruvian plantation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 96 : 69 75.